28-Mar-2024 09:27 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Transmeta don't plan 68k supportANN.lu
Posted on 14-Feb-2000 20:02 GMT by Christian Kemp33 comments
View flat
View list
Black Hand says he repeatedly mailed Transmeta to enquire about 68k emulation support, or the posibility to access and modifiy the morphing code. Here's what Frank Priscaro replied: Supporting the Amiga was something that we considered early on, but had to drop because all of our resources needed to be focused on the Linux and x86 markets. We have no plans at this time to support the 68K family of processors.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Fabrice Jogand-Coulomb13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Transmeta don't plan 68k support : Comment 3 of 33ANN.lu
Posted by John Waller on 13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 2 (Fabrice Jogand-Coulomb):
Why bother? If Amiga Corp succeeds with their plans, all this discussion of CPU's will be irrelevant. Besides, except for low power uses, the Transmeta chip offers no inherent advantage over other CPU's where the new Amiga is concerned.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 4Gringo^mF13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Coz13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Marek Pampuch13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7sutro14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8XDelusion14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9JW Olson14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Mario Saitti...14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Hasse14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Paul Laycock14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Neko14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Thomas Palestig14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15John Block14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Mario Saitti14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Plain English14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18John Waller14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19sutro14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20thedoctor14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Mario Saitti14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Marek Pampuch14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Plain English15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24Plain English15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Plain English15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Mario Saitti15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Mario Saitti15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Mario Saitti15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Anonymously Named Novice16-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 31Plain English16-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Shaun Murray16-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 33Mario Saitti16-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top