25-Apr-2024 04:00 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Transmeta don't plan 68k supportANN.lu
Posted on 14-Feb-2000 20:02 GMT by Christian Kemp33 comments
View flat
View list
Black Hand says he repeatedly mailed Transmeta to enquire about 68k emulation support, or the posibility to access and modifiy the morphing code. Here's what Frank Priscaro replied: Supporting the Amiga was something that we considered early on, but had to drop because all of our resources needed to be focused on the Linux and x86 markets. We have no plans at this time to support the 68K family of processors.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Fabrice Jogand-Coulomb13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3John Waller13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Gringo^mF13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Coz13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Marek Pampuch13-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7sutro14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Transmeta don't plan 68k support : Comment 8 of 33ANN.lu
Posted by XDelusion on 14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
I thought Amiga's best possible future would stem from Transmeta, but then I realized that Amiga is in bed with the company who offers us this!!!!
http://www.tao-group.com/2/tao/index.html
Besides maybe Transmeta will change there mind...
Time will tell, though I really want Amiga OS on my PeeSea RIGHT NOW!!!
Sorry, but hey guys, were kinda in shit creek, pardon the fench. Something really imaginary, needed, and inovative needs to come from Amiga/Transmeta if there is ever going to be a hope in hell.
If all else fails, I will stick with A dual (or more) processor based IBM, or standard PeeSea mother board, running Linux, with VMWare assigning independent CPU's for the OS's I will be running in the X enviroment.
Like Amiga OS, it has a GUI, it has CLI, it has Multi-Screens, It has a form of MUI, ect. ect. For me, it is the closest thing to Amiga I have got. And if this amiga business fails, I hope someone makes an Amiga OS based X enviroment for me.
Jump...
#18 John Waller
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 9JW Olson14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Mario Saitti...14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Hasse14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Paul Laycock14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Neko14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Thomas Palestig14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15John Block14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Mario Saitti14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Plain English14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18John Waller14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19sutro14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20thedoctor14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Mario Saitti14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Marek Pampuch14-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Plain English15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24Plain English15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Plain English15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Mario Saitti15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Mario Saitti15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Mario Saitti15-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Anonymously Named Novice16-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 31Plain English16-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Shaun Murray16-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 33Mario Saitti16-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top