28-Mar-2024 20:39 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Motd] Popup windowANN.lu
Posted on 22-Feb-2000 21:34 GMT by Christian Kemp46 comments
View flat
View list
Through a temporary deal, I will be running a popup advert on ANN (Javascript-enabled browsers only). While I'm not really in favour of popups of any kind, I guess sometimes compromises need to be made. In this case the payout and therefore my financial well-being seemed to be a pretty strong argument. Notice that this is a temporary action. I'm also open to your comments and criticisms, please use the comments section on the right of this message.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Trizt21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Bob C.21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3AGregory21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Christian Kemp21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Christian Kemp21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Radcliff21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Popup window : Comment 7 of 46ANN.lu
Posted by Christian Kemp on 21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 3 (AGregory):
> Anyway, I still think you are providing a good service to us
> poor Amiga users, but please consider a different(legal) way
> of augmenting your income...
I pretty much tried everything else. :(
> 1 suggestion, might be to have one or two more advertisements from
> big firms...or a bunch of little links to amiga companies....
> Anyway, keep up the good work.
Big individual companies are not all that interested in sponsoring Amiga sites.
Agencies such as Flycast or DoubleClick require more impressions than I can
deliver in a month (250,000 and 1,000,000 respectively). I applied for Sonar-
Network (DoubleClick's new 125,000+ programme) but after I signed my contract
didn't hear back from them. BurstMedia said they don't have enough suitable
advertisers, so they can't target my site and therefore can't accept me back in.
ImageNetworks is having very few CPM banners, and is paying a very low rate at
these. All other networks rely on CPC campaigns, but since only very few people
are checking out the advertisers on here, that's no viable option either. As
for Eternity, they are a very nice sponsor, but it's a sad fact that nowadays
no Amiga retailer/producer/programmer/.. can afford to pay industry standard
rates for adverts. In fact, in my year-long quest, Eternity were the only ones
who were actually willing to sponsor me at a rate we both could accept.
I hope I made things a little bit clearer. :)
Jump...
#9 Screyso #22 Lee Bosch #24 Kent Seaton
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 8Bob Shirley21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9Screyso21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous21-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Jay22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Paul D. Ferguson22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Bill Bonner22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Tin22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Scott Konowal22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Mark Olsen22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Len Carsner22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18Brad Devlin22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Brad Devlin22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Brian Kamman22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Lee Bosch22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 23James Russell22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24Kent Seaton22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25RoboChook22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Antoine Chavasse22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Cybes22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Eoghann Irving22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Mark Olsen22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 31MashMan22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Steven22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Hasse22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 35Christian Kemp22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 36Mike Pindzola22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 37Mike Pindzola22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 38Bob Washburne22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 39Adam Szymczak22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 40Andre Page22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 41amorel22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 42buzz22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 43Christian Kemp22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 44Eoghann Irving22-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous23-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 46buzz23-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top