24-Apr-2024 07:59 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] 1GHz Athlon releasedANN.lu
Posted on 09-Mar-2000 21:57 GMT by Christian Kemp32 comments
View flat
View list
Sauro quotes BoingWorld: According to the AMD website the Athlon 1GHz chip has been released, and the first boxes that will be available will come from Compaq & Gateway. You can read a review of the new Athlon chip here. See AMD's web site too.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Splatt09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Jakob Jancic09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Sauro09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Matthew09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Hattig09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Plain English09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Mark Olsen09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9Ben Hermans/Hyperion09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Hernendez09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11sutro09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Jofre Furtado09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Jofre Furtado09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Ben Hermans/Hyperion09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Plain English09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Plain English09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Ben Hermans/Hyperion09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18Ben Hermans/Hyperion09-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19the man in the shadows10-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Ventzislav Tzvetkov10-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Jofre Furtado10-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
1GHz Athlon released : Comment 22 of 32ANN.lu
Posted by Jofre Furtado on 11-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 16 (Plain English):
Pile of shit?
Really?
I work at a Graphic Design firm that uses PC's- I'll have you know that MOST servers, even when the software is WindowsNT, are ACTUALLY UNIX-- NOT x86!
Constant Development? Oh, Please- and where did it go? I see no improvements...
Picking up clock speed by number is not progress, I'm sorry. Pentium class CPU's are good, don't get me wrong- but NOT as good as PPC- ESPECIALLY IF THE FREAKIN OS DOESN'T KNOW SHIT FROM SHINGLES AND DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO USE IT!!! Are we paying attention? My argument was not that they totally suck, but that they are not as good as PPC- The OS that currently runs on them is Windows, which renders the hardware near useless, not the hardware itself- but you can NOT tell me that putting something like TAO's Elate or Linux OS's on a Pentium class system will out perform a PPC running the same OS. PowerPC also has a superior architecture beyond the CPU and into the board and utilizes hardware properly- Wintels do NOT do this! Custom boards are superior to industry standard- we all know this- The Pentium class CPU's are made for a board that sucks and does not perform well- it doesn't go on anything else, therefore it is slower due to the bus speed anyway. Clock speed DOES NOT MATTER in reality. Co-processing capabilities are not as efficient. You want proof? Take a 68040 Amiga (25MHz) and put next to its competitor, the 486 (at 33MHz)- Um, I don't think that an Episode of Babylon5 or Jurrasic Park will be created on the latter- the other already proved it could. Defend it all you want, but Amigans stuck by their product because it was good-better and demanded no less- Windows people and MAC people have ripped each other off, pissed each other off, and made their crap systems into a religion more than anything else- just keep an open mind.
And I know I should talk after this response, but PLEASE keep the profanity down in here- I'm sure that the ANN host doesn't appreciate it and it's just not appropriate for a computer discussion sight. And if you're gonna be a pessimistic "IBMer", then screw- this is NOT a sight for you.
Jump...
#24 Plain English
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 23Plaion English11-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24Plain English11-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25loic13-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26loic13-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Plain English13-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Unleaded13-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Brad Jacobsen14-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30jim14-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 31Brad Jacobsen14-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Brad Jacobsen14-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top