20-Apr-2024 14:41 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga lowering A1200 pricesANN.lu
Posted on 23-Mar-2000 13:14 GMT by Christian Kemp21 comments
View flat
View list
The newsticker at the German Amiga shop AS WebShop reports that Amiga International is lowering prices for A1200's and quote DM 199 and DM 249 as their respective retail prices for A1200's without HD and with 170 MB HD.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Paul Laycock22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Sledge22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Sledge22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6NihilVor22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8TOASTER22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9john block22-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous23-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11redrumloa23-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12redrumloa23-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13cYB0rG23-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Amiga lowering A1200 prices : Comment 14 of 21ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous Dog Vomit on 23-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 13 (cYB0rG):
You are right. It's not up to anyone to tell you how to spend your money.
Just understand that numbers talk.
It's nice to see Amiga_Company_X dumping off the old line at a price that would make it attractive to many. It's a good idea. After all, when any company has product that isn't selling well or is about to be replaced, you dump your existing product as quickly as possible to get some revenue for it before it completely stagnates. This is known as the "Osbourne Theory" (many of us who have been around long enough should know what that is)
So quite possibly something impressive will be announced at the GW show by Amiga_Company_X. Maybe more than a developer box, maybe not. But just understand that I'm sure they understand the existing Classic_Amiga market is not sustainable and needs to be replaced.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 15Manuel Jesus24-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Mart24-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17David Scheibler24-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous24-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19graham25-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20ZimZum25-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Watts Martin25-Mar-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top