28-Mar-2024 19:50 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] ElateOS hosted on PPC/xVision by H&PANN.lu
Posted on 09-May-2000 06:46 GMT by Christian Kemp18 comments
View flat
View list
"sutro" quotes this page on Eyetech's server that says: Elate is currently available on a number of processors - including x86 and PowerPC - and is also available as a 'hosted' OS (at about 50% efficiency) under Linux - and this is the environment to be used for the Developer System.. The Blizzard PPC/xVision version still needs some fine tuning - currently being undertaken by Haage & Partner - but is expected to be released in a couple of months. On its release this (PPC/xVision) software will form the main upgrade path for the current 'classic' Amiga user, whilst maintaining compatibility with 680x0-based software.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Leif08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Trizt08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Weirdo08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Kevin08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 5Henrik Mikael Kristensen08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Martin Baute08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Henrik Mikael Kristensen08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 8Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Mark Olsen08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Colin Wilson08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Mark Olsen08-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 12Jofre Furtado09-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Mark Olsen09-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 14SnuggleBunny09-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Trizt09-May-2000 22:00 GMT
ElateOS hosted on PPC/xVision by H&P : Comment 16 of 18ANN.lu
Posted by David Shipman on 09-May-2000 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
There seems to be a great deal of confusion here, with reference to an "AMD 500"... now, to point out the obvious for those who have missed it, AMD is a manufacturer. There is a substantial difference between a K6 and K7 (Athlon). The K6 is well known for inferior FPU power to Intel cpus, but the Athlon performs better than a P3 per mhz. Comparing this to a 233 604e you should see that even the fastest accelerated (classic) Amiga is too slow (imho) for any cpu intensive NG Amiga (read : developer box) applications...
Jump...
#17 Jeff Martin
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 17Jeff Martin09-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 18XDelusion11-May-2000 22:00 GMT
Back to Top