28-Mar-2024 12:44 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga announces the AmigaOneANN.lu
Posted on 21-Oct-2000 14:22 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä119 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga have just released this press release about the AmigaOne hardware spec. Eyetech will build the first actual boxes, which are Classic Amiga/AmigaOne hybrids (both A1200 and A4000-based models will be available) and will be based on PPC. They are scheduled for a Q1 2001 release. First stand-alone AmigaOnes should ship in Q3 2001. Also, the development of the Classic AmigaOS will continue with v3.9 coming out before Christmas.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Bill Toner20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 2ACGregory20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 4fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 5fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 6fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 8Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Joe "Floid" Kanowitz20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 10szutoman20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 11fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 12szutoman20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Paul McCord20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 14torsten20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Tony Gore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Mathew20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 19Kojak20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 20Alberto Mendez20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 22Darrin20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 24dbentham20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 25Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Janne Sirén20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 29bbuilder20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 30anymouse20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 32Teemu I. Yliselä20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 33Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 34Amifan20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 35David Myers20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 36Amifan20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 37george21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 38Hagge21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 39Hagge21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 41STRICQ21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 43NihilVor21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 44XDelusion21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 46Seehund21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 47Dave Mountford21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 48XDelusion21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 49bbuilder21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 50Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 51Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 52fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 53fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 54fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 55fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 56Troels Ersking21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 57fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 58fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 59Chris Moore21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 60Carl Mohlin21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 62Mart21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 63Don Cox21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 64Johnny21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 65David Myers21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 67Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 68Alcemyst21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 69sutro21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 70Tony Gore21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 71sutro21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 72Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 73Bill Toner21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 74Roberto C.21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 75szutoman21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 76fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 77fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 78Stefan21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 79Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 80Paul McCord21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 81Trizt21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 82Alkis Tsapanidis21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 83Donovan Reeve21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 84Rik Sweeney21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 85Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 86Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 87bbuilder21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 88Radfoo21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 89anymouse22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 90Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 91Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 92Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 93Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 94Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 95Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 96fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 97fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 98fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 99fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 100Alkis Tsapanidis22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 101Stefan22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Amiga announces the AmigaOne : Comment 102 of 119ANN.lu
Posted by Andy H on 22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 98 (fleecy):
Fleecy:
You obviously have me confused with an "Amigan". I'm not. I'm an Amiga User, and I have only been for the past two years. I could go back to using a PC anytime I wish but I don't because I enjoy using my current system. I don't give a stuff about Commodore, Escom or Gateway, most of whom were well before my time.
What I am worried about is the Tao software, it IS the way forward, I don't care if it is Amiga or Be or someone else who brings it to the masses. What worries me is if you flop in a big heap, it will damage Tao's credibilty as a mainstream OS. Setting back the introduction of such a revolutionary system.
You have stated all along that nothing would be announced until it is set in stone. I find that admirable, but it is just as bad, actually worse to drop little (or in some cases HUGE) hints, about major developments and "Japanese businessmen" when you either haven't anything to announce or can't for some reason.
I don't care about the AmigaOne anymore, it is about choice right? I'll let the Users make thier own choices, but I do care if they are messed about or ripped off. I'm most worried about the 3rd party support, and the available software, there is very little evidence to suggest that anyone outside the Amiga community is actually developing anything. You won't get very far with just the current amiga userbase.
I owe you nothing and you owe me nothing, but you owe it to all those that will follow you to hell and back because of your company name and to the Tao group not to stuff this up.
This will be my last posting on this matter, or it'll drag on forever. If either Fleecy or anyone else wants to discuss this further then Email me.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 103Sharpshooter22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 104Chris Tsaldaris22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 105Chris Tsaldaris22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 106Trizt22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 107Karajorma22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 108Sjoerd22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 109victor #22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 110S. Hakim Hamdani22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 111Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 112Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 113MAS22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 114Kolbjørn Barmen23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 115Kolbjørn Barmen23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 116XDelusion23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 117XDelusion23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 118Anonymous23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 119Donovan Reeve24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Back to Top