20-Apr-2024 04:31 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga announces the AmigaOneANN.lu
Posted on 21-Oct-2000 14:22 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä119 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga have just released this press release about the AmigaOne hardware spec. Eyetech will build the first actual boxes, which are Classic Amiga/AmigaOne hybrids (both A1200 and A4000-based models will be available) and will be based on PPC. They are scheduled for a Q1 2001 release. First stand-alone AmigaOnes should ship in Q3 2001. Also, the development of the Classic AmigaOS will continue with v3.9 coming out before Christmas.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Bill Toner20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 2ACGregory20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 4fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 5fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 6fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 8Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Joe "Floid" Kanowitz20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 10szutoman20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 11fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 12szutoman20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Paul McCord20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 14torsten20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Tony Gore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Mathew20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 19Kojak20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 20Alberto Mendez20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 22Darrin20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 24dbentham20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 25Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Janne Sirén20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 29bbuilder20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 30anymouse20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 32Teemu I. Yliselä20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 33Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 34Amifan20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 35David Myers20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 36Amifan20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 37george21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 38Hagge21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 39Hagge21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 41STRICQ21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 43NihilVor21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 44XDelusion21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 46Seehund21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 47Dave Mountford21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 48XDelusion21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 49bbuilder21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 50Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 51Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 52fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 53fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 54fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 55fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 56Troels Ersking21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 57fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 58fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 59Chris Moore21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 60Carl Mohlin21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 62Mart21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 63Don Cox21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 64Johnny21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 65David Myers21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 67Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 68Alcemyst21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 69sutro21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 70Tony Gore21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 71sutro21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 72Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 73Bill Toner21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 74Roberto C.21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 75szutoman21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 76fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 77fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 78Stefan21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 79Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 80Paul McCord21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 81Trizt21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 82Alkis Tsapanidis21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 83Donovan Reeve21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 84Rik Sweeney21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 85Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 86Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 87bbuilder21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 88Radfoo21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 89anymouse22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 90Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 91Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 92Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 93Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 94Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 95Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 96fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 97fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 98fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 99fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 100Alkis Tsapanidis22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 101Stefan22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 102Andy H22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 103Sharpshooter22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 104Chris Tsaldaris22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 105Chris Tsaldaris22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 106Trizt22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 107Karajorma22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 108Sjoerd22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 109victor #22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 110S. Hakim Hamdani22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Amiga announces the AmigaOne : Comment 111 of 119ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 99 (fleecy):
Yes Fleecy I did read the PR release several times. It took that
many times because of disbelief. Btw...I have written Exbox and
expressed my oppions on the A3000T's and the A4000T's being
left out, and I'm telling you they have cut their market in
half perhaps more in the US and probably Canada as well.
From what I read in the release is they are making these
cards for the A1200 and the A4000 only, and those are not
even for orginal machines as they have to be ripped out of their
original cases and put in a tower??? Who makes the towers???
They say they want to help the owners of the classic Amiga
extend their investment, however A1200 owners and A4000 owners
are going to have to buy the "tower" if they don't already have
such a borg machine.
Now, if you wonder why I'm moaning here...isn't this a comment
chatboard? That is what this thing is for. I have expressed my
oppions and I stand by them. I'm not trying to bash you, Amiga,
Inc., or Elbox. I have just expressed my oppion that with their
solution they have cut out all original big box Amigas completely
off. I have found that people with the A3000T and A4000T will
spend alot more money on these generally than others, but we
will not have a solution. That does not sit well with me.
As stated before in my own area I know about 40 Amiga users
and again I state that not one of them even own an A1200
and only a handful own A4000's. Most of them own A3000T's
or A4000T's. I stand by the statement that Exbox is cutting
off well over 50% of the existing Amiga user in the US and
Canada. I don't think that's a very smart move in light
of the continously shrinking existing Amiga user base.
Granted Exbox is in the UK, and where they did their research
is unknown. I'm sure many, many A1200's were sold in the UK
and some A4000's, however that does not represent the rest of
the world. Again, I say that probably most of the A1200's sold
are probably in their box under the bed or in the closet right
beside the A500's and C64s', and they are not even being used,
except for the die hards that have upgraded them.
Most users I personally know here and others I know from online
in both the US and Canada have big box Amigas. I'm expressing
my oppinion that their research is flawed and they are not
looking at the overall big picture of what is representative
of Amiga users in the US and Canada. I'm sure there are some
A1200's being used and some A4000's, but overall in the US
and Canada I think they will find that the higher percentage
of current Amiga users are on big box Amigas...A3000T's,
A4000T's, and the A3000 and the A2000, and that these users
have spent big bucks to keep these machines running and as
up to date as possible at this time.
I think the idea is a good one till the AmigaOne comes out,
but I cannot think any other way concerning the LARGE segment
of Amiga users that are left out in the cold by this solution.
Again I'm not trying to bash anyone. I'm discussing what I think
is a tragic mistake on the part of Exbox. I don't blame you,
Amiga, Inc., nor am I trying to condem anyone. The simple fact
is that I strongly believe that leaving current original big
box towers like the A3000T and the A4000T is a mistake, apparently
fueled by faulty research on the part of Exbox. Again, who is it
that makes these required tower cases for one to shove their
A1200 and A4000 guts into? Exbox???
After all this is a discussion board isn't it? This is where we
are supposed to discuss like this and bitch and moan if need be,
but that don't mean we all are not friends. I've never met an
Amiga user that was not immediately a friend. :)
My post here and my concerns are valid, and I think many would
agree. If you big box Amiga owners haven't written Exbox yet
I suggest that you do so, hopefully in droves.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 112Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 113MAS22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 114Kolbjørn Barmen23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 115Kolbjørn Barmen23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 116XDelusion23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 117XDelusion23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 118Anonymous23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 119Donovan Reeve24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Back to Top