19-Apr-2024 03:38 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga announces the AmigaOneANN.lu
Posted on 21-Oct-2000 14:22 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä119 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga have just released this press release about the AmigaOne hardware spec. Eyetech will build the first actual boxes, which are Classic Amiga/AmigaOne hybrids (both A1200 and A4000-based models will be available) and will be based on PPC. They are scheduled for a Q1 2001 release. First stand-alone AmigaOnes should ship in Q3 2001. Also, the development of the Classic AmigaOS will continue with v3.9 coming out before Christmas.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Bill Toner20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 2ACGregory20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 4fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 5fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 6fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 8Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Joe "Floid" Kanowitz20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 10szutoman20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 11fleecy20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 12szutoman20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Paul McCord20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 14torsten20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Tony Gore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Mathew20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 19Kojak20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 20Alberto Mendez20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 22Darrin20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 24dbentham20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 25Mart20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Janne Sirén20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 29bbuilder20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 30anymouse20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 32Teemu I. Yliselä20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 33Chris Moore20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 34Amifan20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 35David Myers20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 36Amifan20-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 37george21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 38Hagge21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 39Hagge21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 41STRICQ21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 43NihilVor21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 44XDelusion21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 46Seehund21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 47Dave Mountford21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 48XDelusion21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 49bbuilder21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 50Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 51Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 52fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 53fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 54fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 55fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 56Troels Ersking21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 57fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 58fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 59Chris Moore21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 60Carl Mohlin21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 62Mart21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 63Don Cox21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 64Johnny21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 65David Myers21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 67Nils Mokleiv21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 68Alcemyst21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 69sutro21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 70Tony Gore21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 71sutro21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 72Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 73Bill Toner21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 74Roberto C.21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 75szutoman21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 76fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 77fleecy21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 78Stefan21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 79Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 80Paul McCord21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 81Trizt21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 82Alkis Tsapanidis21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 83Donovan Reeve21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 84Rik Sweeney21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 85Anonymous21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 86Andy H21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 87bbuilder21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 88Radfoo21-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 89anymouse22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 90Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 91Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 92Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 93Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 94Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 95Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 96fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 97fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 98fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 99fleecy22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 100Alkis Tsapanidis22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 101Stefan22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 102Andy H22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 103Sharpshooter22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 104Chris Tsaldaris22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 105Chris Tsaldaris22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 106Trizt22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 107Karajorma22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 108Sjoerd22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 109victor #22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 110S. Hakim Hamdani22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 111Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 112Anonymous22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 113MAS22-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 114Kolbjørn Barmen23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 115Kolbjørn Barmen23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 116XDelusion23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 117XDelusion23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 118Anonymous23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Amiga announces the AmigaOne : Comment 119 of 119ANN.lu
Posted by Donovan Reeve on 24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
OK, since I'm desperate I am going to try again.
Fleecy, first of all I want to thank you for being willing to
answer some questions for us. It is very helpful and appreciated.
Someone seemed to think I was griping, which I wasn't. I guess
they didn't read my message very well. I did seem to lose you
though Fleecy, in my mile long message. Sorry about that.
I just wanted it understood that some of us actually need our
computers and when they die we can neither afford to wait a year
for a replacement nor to pay more than the cost of a new machine
of another platform to have them repaired.
I thought the Amiga DE was going to be at least somewhat hardware
independant? Or did I get the wrong idea. OK, if we can't run it
native on a PC, and we can't run it native on a Mac, what WILL
it run on? Only speciallized Amiga systems? Doesn't that defeat
the whole purpose?
Mind you, it won't bother me that much if it requires special
hardware if it is cool and reasonably priced, but I fail to see
then where the "write once, run anywhere" bit has much validity.
Or were you just refering to running it hosted? I thought that
it would run native on many types of hardware useing the processor-
specific run-modules under the DE and drivers for the other hardware?
If I'm all wet with my thinking, just say so. But was hoping that
now we Amigans could take advantage of the cheap hardware we can
buy from the local chain store or mail order. If we have to keep
buying hardware which is way more expensive than that for other platforms
the market will continue to dwindle untill we are all forced to
drop out whether we want to or not.
I need new hardware now, as mine is dying. No form of Amiga One
is ready yet, and the A4000/A1200 based units won't do me any good
as I have no viable A4000 or A1200 motherboards. I know I can host
the Amiga DE on a Linux machine, but I want to run Amiga native
when it is available that way and I cant afford to buy a Linux box
now and an Amiga One a few months later.
So, my question is... is there any intel or mac based setup which
I can currently purchase which will be able to run the Amiga DE
native when it is availailable in that format? Or is the Amiga One
the only hardware which will ever run the Amiga DE native?
Thankyou for your kind consideration,
Donovan Reeve (bubby@inebraska.com)
Jump...
TopPrevious commentbottom
Back to Top