25-Apr-2024 08:11 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Eyetech give AmigaOne specificationANN.lu
Posted on 24-Oct-2000 18:02 GMT by Christian Kemp27 comments
View flat
View list
Chris Moore writes: Eyetech group have released an article on their web site explaning the new AmigaOne A1200 and A4000 PPC systems. The system can actually run without the A1200/A4000 motherboard. The article explains all about the new systems and has a brief history of the Eyetech Group. The A1200/A4000 motherboards are an expansion of the AmigaOne, rather than the other way round and will be able to run MorphOS or OS3.9 as well as AmigaDE natively.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Rik Sweeney23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Radfoo23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Mark Bowman23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Rick Pezzimenti23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 5Oliver Wright23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Radfoo23-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Eyetech give AmigaOne specification : Comment 7 of 27ANN.lu
Posted by bbuilder on 24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 2 (Radfoo):
I've got every reason to believe that OS3.9 is delivered with WarpUp.
I would not be surprised if Ralph &Co do not support AmigaOne1200/4000,
but hopefully they do.
A friend of mine said that MorphOS works nicely on his BPPC.
-bbuilder
btw. I have started to get following e-mails from my Linux using friends:
"Amiga 1.0:/$ speed
VP MIOPS303.900401
VP MLOPS71.542352
VP MFOPS31.758831
VP MDOPS17.620993
..."
One NEW developer for AmigaDE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
;-)
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 8Anonymous24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Kojak24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Lightning24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Troll24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 12Frederik24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 13J24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 14Lightning24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Ian24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 16J24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 17ehaines24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Steffen Haeuser24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 19Chris Moore24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 20Chris Moore24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Rik Sweeney24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 22theJUDGE24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 23Mark Bowman24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 24Mark Bowman24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 25XDelusion24-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 26James Carroll25-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Ian25-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Back to Top