06-Dec-2024 10:24 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] Should AmigaOS be Open Source?ANN.lu
Posted on 27-Oct-2000 12:06 GMT by 16 comments
View flat
View list
Georg Steger submitted a short essay on whether AmigaOS should be Open Source, and how to a certain extent (for some people) it already is, or was. A few days ago I have heard from a reliable source that there are quite a lot of people who are in possess of the AmigaOS 3.1 (and older) sources. And this since very long time (> 5 years).

And this people are not Amiga Inc. or Haage&Partner people. Most of them are very well known and famous among Amiga freaks. For example former employees of Commodore, authors of Amiga programming books, some "butterflies".

It seems that the AmigaOS sources have helped this people in making their products/software/hardware/whatever for Amiga. It's very likely that without the AmigaOS sources some of the products would not even have been possible to make. So it was probably no bad thing for Commodore/Escom/Gateway/ Amiga Inc. More likely the opposite: maybe Amiga would have been (really) dead since long time, if this accidents (AmigaOS source going out of their hands) had not happened.

Amiga Inc. says they are commited to open source. But anyway they don't seem to have any intention to really release AmigaOS Classic as Open Source, for everybody. They must have very weird reasons for this. "Protect their IP"? Then why are the people mentioned above no problem for them? (and I cannot believe that Amiga Inc. does not know anything about other people having access to AmigaOS sources). I guess it's clear why: these people were and are good for them.

But then why not release AmigaOS source for everybody? The argument that it would hurt Haage&Partner, Cloanto, ... is not true, IMHO. After all Amiga Inc. is working on a new OS, and AmigaOS 3.9 seems to be the last update to the classic OS. Even if the AmigaOS sources would have been released a year ago, there is very little chance that this would have caused any competition to AmigaOS 3.9 once it is released.

So if certain non-Amiga Inc. people are allowed to have the AmigaOS sources, maybe even make money based on what they learn from the sources. Why aren't other people allowed to do the same, like the AROS team? Who do everything for free, where the source already is free and which everyone can use for whatever he wants.

Without AmigaOS sources as documentation it of course takes very long to finish AROS. But one day it will be finished - if Amiga Inc. is so kind not to kill us shortly before ;-) BTW: I'm wondering which source will then be worth more: AmigaOS source (mix of ASM/C/BCPL and very hardware dependant) or AROS (almost C only, almost hardware independant, RTG, RTA, portable). I don't know ...

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Ben26-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Marcel26-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Georg Steger26-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Should AmigaOS be Open Source? : Comment 4 of 16ANN.lu
Posted by Georg Steger on 26-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 2 (Marcel):
: Maybe after the AmigaDE is out, AmigaOS will have a decent chance
: of being opensourced. Right now AmigaOS is still a
: potential revenue stream for AInc, and I doubt they will "set it free"
: anytime soon.
I don't think that after open sourcing AmigaOS they would all
of the sudden make less money. They would anyway not release
the newest OS. We would even be extremely happy with OS 2.0.
And they of course would not (have to) release all of the OS,
for example the parts which are owned by others, like ARexx.
So the Sources would not be compilable anyway. And that would not
be a problem at all for us. It would mostly serve as documentation
for us. So even if they released only some very small parts, like
console device, or amigaguide.library, we would be still extremely
happy. And how can such small parts of the OS be of any risk for
the revenue stream for Amiga Inc.?
And BTW: Everybody is allowed to make money with AROS, also Amiga
Inc. And people who would make money with AROS, would not even have
to pay anything to the AROS coders.
Once Amiga Inc. made the AROS team an offer which would have allowed
us to have access to the AmigaOS sources. But the offer was not very
good. A minor problem was that we would have been allowed to only use
the sources as documentation, but not for copy&pasting. We could have
lived with this without any problem. But other things were not so
nice. They wanted that AROS for 2 or 3 years must run exclusively
hosted under Ami, their new OS. So no standalone version for this
period of time. And to make sure that noone ported it to some other
computer, AROS would have had to go even close sourced for that
period of time :-(
Jump...
#5 m0ns00n #7 greenboy
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 5m0ns00n26-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 6XDelusion26-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 7greenboy26-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 8Thomas Würgler27-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Elwood27-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 10noname27-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous27-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 12greenboy27-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Georg Steger28-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 14Georg Steger28-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Georg Steger28-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Georg Steger28-Oct-2000 22:00 GMT
Back to Top