24-Apr-2024 16:23 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] New Executive UpdateANN.lu
Posted on 25-Nov-2000 13:35 GMT by Christian Kemp64 comments
View flat
View list
Bill McEwen has posted a new Executive Update, where he hints that there might be a strong possibility of an AmigaOS 4.0, if sales of 3.9 are good enough, and announces that there will be more details and announcements at the Amiga World show in Cologne next month.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Jim Ross24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Chris24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Jaeson Koszarsky24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Carlos24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
New Executive Update : Comment 5 of 64ANN.lu
Posted by Nabs on 24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 4 (Carlos):
How do you figure that it was a "trick"?
The original line was unless 3.5 sells well, there won't be a 3.6.
3.5 sold reasonably well, but less than the required 20,000 units. Since AmigaDE
was pending, there was no point in continuing with Classic OS development
anyway. But, as Bill says, they listened to requests for continued development,
and now we have OS 3.9.
So, one way or another, we got another Classic OS release. If 3.5 had sold
-really- badly, like a few thousand units, we would never have seen 3.9, no
matter how many people petitioned Bill/AInc. So it does make sense to buy 3.9.
3.9 is like any piece of software for the Amiga has been for the last 5 years:
support the developers, or don't expect the developers to stick around, and
forget any new versions. It's not like MicroSoft, or any other big software
house, who will release new versions no matter what. 3.9 may be backed by Amiga,
but that shouldn't be taken as any guarantee. AmigaDE is a completely different
entity.
To those who say it's just Aminet stuff, there are significant bugfixes,
including longstanding ones (ie. those not fixed in BB1).
Everyone should stop their whining. Why does everyone in the Amiga market want
everything without any effort on their behalf? A PPC version of the Classic OS
has been our Holy Grail for years. If getting to it (ie. v4.0) means spending
£40 on 3.9, then cough up (however IMHO, we will never see a PPC-based Classic
OS from Amiga; the development time/cost is not worth it, when they will have a
much bigger market in the AmigaDE).
Stop expecting something for nothing.
Nabs..
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 6SoT24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Martin Baute24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Ben Yoris24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9Amifan24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Chris24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Fed up of waiting, and loving my new PS2!24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Kay Are Ulvestad24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Karl XII24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17the man in the shadows24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18Ben Hermans/Hyperion24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Ben Hermans/Hyperion24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20JT24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Joe "Floid" Kanowitz24-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Ville Sarell25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24redrumloa25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25the man in the shadows25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26MAS25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Mike25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Dirk Baeyens25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Kojak25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Matt Hey25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 31Christian Kemp25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Remco Komduur25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 33Ben Hermans/Hyperion25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Rich25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 35Buzzy25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 38Don Cox25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 39Martin Tilsted25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 40Fab25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 41Richie25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 42Rich25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 43Matthew Leaman25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 44Pete25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 45Amifan25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 46Ben Hermans/Hyperion25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 47Ben Hermans/Hyperion25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 48Buzzy25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous25-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 50Richie26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 51StormLord26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 52Paolo "Mod3m" D'Urso26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 53Frederik Yssing26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 54Remco Komduur26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 56Mousky26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 57Mousky26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 58Olivier Fabre26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 59Kay Are Ulvestad26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 60Paolo "Mod3m" D'Urso27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 61richie29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 62Remco Komduur29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 63Mark29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 64...03-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top