25-Apr-2024 04:12 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Ralph Schmidt interviewANN.lu
Posted on 27-Nov-2000 19:04 GMT by Christian Kemp57 comments
View flat
View list
christophe Decanini noticed there's an interview (in French and (English) with Ralph Schmidt of MorphOs fame on on AmigaImpact. He also provided a summary (read more below).
  • Limited (68k) support of mediator if no use of MMU tricks.
  • Support of G-REX hardware (G-REX software is done by MorphOS team).
  • Eyetech products support will be decided once available.
  • Elbox did not contact Morphos team and MorphOS team do not think a lot of PPC owner will adopt mediator.
  • MorphOS team members are part of Bplan, MorphOS will run on Bplan hardware. There will be an announcement early december.
  • Morphos need to be working stable on CyberstormPPC and Blizzard PPC to be sell as a commercial product then MorphOS will be hardware independent to run on new bplan hardware. Perhaps it will also run on Macintosh. No X86 port expected.
  • Recompiling a warpup application is the only way to run it on MorphOS.
  • Name of developers for MorphOS application will be anounced in december.
  • Not decided yet on how MorphOS will be sell. OEM, from Vapor online web or from other distributors.
  • MorphOS team could adopt the type of developpers structure Vapor is using today.
  • A third beta version of MorphOS should be out in next weeks with PPC version of MUI, YAM, CED, MagicMenu, AmiTCP, ADE. All PPC users should try it and give feedbacks to enhance MorphOS.
I did not verify every point of this summary, please visit the original in case of any doubts.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Stéphane "SteaG" Campan26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Amifan26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Buzzy26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Stephan Neise26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Ralph Schmidt26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Ralph Schmidt27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Nils Mokleiv27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Ralph Schmidt27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16silverdr27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18yet another anonymous moron who couldn't spell his27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Mark Olsen27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Mark Olsen27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Martin Heine27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Richie27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Ralph Schmidt interview : Comment 23 of 57ANN.lu
Posted by Roj on 27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 22 (Richie):
Yeah, it's people like you that cause superior products to disppear in favor of their cheaper, lower-quality counterparts (Beta vs. VHS et al, just about anything vs. Wintel, et al). In the end, you get what you pay for.
You CANNOT convince me that the PC architecture is the best there's ever been for any computer platform. It's cheap because the patents were given away by the makers. They gave them away because they saw no future for such an inferior computer design. Sure it's gotten to the point of superiority because of the sheer numbers of people and dollars driving it. But the fact that it's so widely accepted as the norm makes it close to impossible for machines with better underlying architecture to surface long enough to be recognized by the mainstream.
A great big thank you and a big wet one right on the kisser.
As far as the Haage & Partner vs. Phase 5 conflict, I don't know the gory details and frankly I don't want to know. While I believe it would be best if they'd work out their differences, it clearly isn't going to happen. If history repeats itself, the last one standing will be the cheaper, inferior product thanks to the attitude demonstrated by "Richie".
Jump...
#30 Rich
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 24Frederik27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25Sinan Gürkan27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Christophe Decanini27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28David Gerber27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Frederik Yssing27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Rich27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 31bbuilder27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 33Kojak27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Kojak27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 35Mark Olsen27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 36Mark Olsen27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 37Remco Komduur27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 38Andy Hall27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 39Balder Mørk28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 40Mark Olsen28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 41StormLord28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 42Ralph Schmidt28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 43Andy Hall28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 44Mike28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 45Anders Kjeldsen28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 46Sinan Gurkan28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 47Ralph Schmidt28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 48StormLord28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 49Budda28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 51Ralph Schmidt28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 52Kelli Halliburton29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 53Anonymous29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 54Anders Kjeldsen29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 55Anders Kjeldsen29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 56SnuggleBunny30-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 57Amifan01-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top