16-Apr-2024 16:15 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Ralph Schmidt interviewANN.lu
Posted on 27-Nov-2000 19:04 GMT by Christian Kemp57 comments
View flat
View list
christophe Decanini noticed there's an interview (in French and (English) with Ralph Schmidt of MorphOs fame on on AmigaImpact. He also provided a summary (read more below).
  • Limited (68k) support of mediator if no use of MMU tricks.
  • Support of G-REX hardware (G-REX software is done by MorphOS team).
  • Eyetech products support will be decided once available.
  • Elbox did not contact Morphos team and MorphOS team do not think a lot of PPC owner will adopt mediator.
  • MorphOS team members are part of Bplan, MorphOS will run on Bplan hardware. There will be an announcement early december.
  • Morphos need to be working stable on CyberstormPPC and Blizzard PPC to be sell as a commercial product then MorphOS will be hardware independent to run on new bplan hardware. Perhaps it will also run on Macintosh. No X86 port expected.
  • Recompiling a warpup application is the only way to run it on MorphOS.
  • Name of developers for MorphOS application will be anounced in december.
  • Not decided yet on how MorphOS will be sell. OEM, from Vapor online web or from other distributors.
  • MorphOS team could adopt the type of developpers structure Vapor is using today.
  • A third beta version of MorphOS should be out in next weeks with PPC version of MUI, YAM, CED, MagicMenu, AmiTCP, ADE. All PPC users should try it and give feedbacks to enhance MorphOS.
I did not verify every point of this summary, please visit the original in case of any doubts.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Stéphane "SteaG" Campan26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Amifan26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Buzzy26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Stephan Neise26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Ralph Schmidt26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous26-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Ralph Schmidt27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Nils Mokleiv27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Ralph Schmidt27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16silverdr27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18yet another anonymous moron who couldn't spell his27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Mark Olsen27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Mark Olsen27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Martin Heine27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Richie27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Roj27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24Frederik27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25Sinan Gürkan27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Christophe Decanini27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28David Gerber27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Frederik Yssing27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Rich27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 31bbuilder27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 33Kojak27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Kojak27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 35Mark Olsen27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 36Mark Olsen27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 37Remco Komduur27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 38Andy Hall27-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 39Balder Mørk28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 40Mark Olsen28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 41StormLord28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 42Ralph Schmidt28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 43Andy Hall28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 44Mike28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 45Anders Kjeldsen28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 46Sinan Gurkan28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 47Ralph Schmidt28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 48StormLord28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 49Budda28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 51Ralph Schmidt28-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Ralph Schmidt interview : Comment 52 of 57ANN.lu
Posted by Kelli Halliburton on 29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 51 (Ralph Schmidt):
Ralph, how much would H&P (or possibly Amiga Inc.) have to pay you in order to license (or even buy outright) the MorphOS technology?
I am thinking that perhaps the best thing to do is to coordinate advanced AmigaOS development somehow.
Right now, WarpUp can run PowerUp software, but PowerUp cannot run WarpUp software. And MorphOS adds a new wrinkle -- I know it cannot run WarpUp software, but can it run PowerUp software? You have said before that it is possible to write an emulation layer that would allow PowerUp to run WarpUp software, but that it's too much trouble, and you can't be bothered to do it. Is it also possible to write an emulation layer that would allow MorphOS to run WarpUp software?
Obviously, H&P are not going to write that emulation layer for you, because it would cut into the popularity of their own system. And, despite the fact that it would bring everything under one umbrella, allow MorphOS to run pretty much *EVERYTHING*, and give MorphOS a tremendous competitive advantage that could result in dramatically increased revenues, you say that it is too resource-intensive for you to write it yourself.
So the only option I can see is for one company to buy out the other. I don't think DCE is capable of buying out H&P, but perhaps H&P or their partner Amiga Inc. would be interested in buying or licensing MorphOS.
Of course, the bad blood between the two companies means that a deal would be very difficult to achieve. And so the entire community suffers. No one will concede. DCE and H&P are the Gore and Bush of the Amiga community. DCE is Gore, whose products are perhaps technically more sound, but does not have the official stamp of approval. H&P is Bush, lacking in many areas but having the better rapport with the public, and the official stamp of approval. The official stamp of approval itself is questionable, having been granted somewhat arbitrarily, and amid suspicions of political maneuverings.
There's no final result to be had from this, though; no eventual elected proper legal heir to the throne. This battle is fought in the far more nebulous environment of the marketplace where consumers vote with their money, and can split their votes. Both companies are able to continue with this morass of confusion as long as they can remain solvent doing so, but the damage they do to public perceptions of stability is severe. If anything, this bickering will be the final nail in the coffin of the Classic Amiga, as divisiveness and indecision combine to disastrous effect.
I say, let both companies seek financing to buy out the other.
In an alternate history, if Beta & VHS were still competing today, do you think that the video market would be as big as it is now? I doubt it. Why? Because of this: Sony and JVC would eventually adopt the idea of establishing exclusive licensing agreements with content producers: some companies would only release their videos on one format, and some companies would only release on the other. There would be incompatibilities, consumers would refuse to buy two VCRs just so that they could watch all movies. Electronics manufacturers would have to choose which format to support (in our history, JVC's VHS was the only one licensing its technology for a minimal fee; Sony's Beta fees were not competitive).
Consumers don't like incompatibilities, and often settle for the most common option. This is the reason for such the success of such things as VHS and Microsoft Windows. I'd like to think that the Amiga market is better than this, but I wouldn't bet my company on it.
Monopolies exist because consumers don't like incompatibilities. Think of telephones. All over the world, telephone systems are either socialized or controlled mostly by one corporation. There have been efforts to force these monopolies to stop unfair trade practices, but by and large, AT&T still controls the nationwide US telephony market, and its former subsidiaries still control local markets within their scope.
I am actively encouraging that advanced PPC-enhanced Classic Amiga OS development be monopolized. Barring that, software companies still developing for the PPC-enhanced Classic Amiga might choose to seek to dissolve any exclusive OS agreements and make every effort to support both OS platforms.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 53Anonymous29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 54Anders Kjeldsen29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 55Anders Kjeldsen29-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 56SnuggleBunny30-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 57Amifan01-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top