[Rant] Companies are copying Amiga's and TAO Group's ideas | ANN.lu |
Posted on 01-Feb-2001 18:12 GMT by Christian Kemp | 13 comments View flat View list |
Henrik Mikael Kristensen writes: Well, this is actually both an opinion and a news item. Certain events taking place right now in certain companies could be important to the future of Amiga Inc. And it should show why charging 99$ for an SDK is very reasonable, IMHO.
I read an article on a Danish news service SOL.dk, which makes me think that many large companies are trying to duplicate Amiga's idea of the "write once, run anywhere" philoshopy, thus pushing Amiga out of the market before they even get in there.
The US based company QualComm are trying to build a standard operating system to be used on all cell-phones. The standard is called BREW™, Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless. If you take away "Wireless", you'd have what TAO Group is doing. Almost.
Here's a description from their own site: The BREW platform allows developers to create applications that operate on all handsets with QUALCOMM CDMA chipsets. BREW sits between the chip system software and the application, making the phone's functionality available to the application without requiring the developer to have the chip system source code or even a direct relationship with a handset manufacturer.
One concern here is the narrow scope of the operating system: Cell-phones and wireless only.
Another concern is that Microsoft, Symbian and Ericsson are mentioned in the article, making similar systems each with their own standards. Amiga isn't mentioned at all. Just bad journalism? Hopefully.
Worse yet, QualComm want to electronically certify all BREW™ programs before they can run on consumer products and ask a fee of those spreading the programs (phone-companies). That's called the TRUE BREW™ compatibility test. Of course the test itself costs money. End-users will also have to pay for all applications. So basically both users and developers are forced to pay QualComm for application development. Freeware is no option.
This approach is far more hostile towards developers and end-users than what Amiga Inc. have in mind. Even Microsoft aren't this hostile.
Yet still, the largest cell-phone company in the US (Verizon) are following the standards of BREW™, and others are following as well. Amiga may have lost many potential customers there.
Another limitation is that BREW™ currently only runs on a certain CDMA chipset, which resides in over 70 million cellphones spread over 75 different manufacturers (and that was a year ago). Guess who's making this chipset? That's right: QualComm. Sniff... I smell monopoly...
The technology also seems to be inferior to what Amiga are doing (programs are interpreted in runtime, not at load time, thus giving performance losses, environment isn't selfhosted).
So in short: QualComm's solution looks limited both technologically and the way they want to use it.
The solutions provided by the companies previously mentioned won't neither charge developers nor users. I couldn't find much information about their solutions, as only their names were mentioned, not what exactly they were working on.
The point is: Amiga's system has the best technology and Amiga have the best relationship with developers and users, but only they may want to use them. Despite all the efforts at Amiga, everyone else look the other way and can't take Amiga seriously, now that the big players with the big bucks have spoken. This is already apparent in the cell-phone area. Will the situation spread to PDA's, palmtops and appliances? Amiga would then continue to loose customers.
This mirrors the situation we had 10 years ago, where Amiga was slowly sinking into market oblivion, thanks to greedy companies with inferior technologies. I definitely hope that Amiga Inc. will yell out loud enough this time, or the end users will never hear them.
Also this should show those, who think charging 99$ for an SDK is outragous, that there are companies out there who would happily charge your mother and brother-in-law for every interaction you do as a developer with that company. And those are companies that aren't exactly short on money, like Amiga are now. So I think 99$ is very reasonable.
|
|
List of all comments to this articleSorted by date, most recent at bottom |
Comment 1 | Anonymous | | 31-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT |
Comment 2 | Wan | | 31-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT |
Comment 3 | Troels Ersking | | 31-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT |
Comment 4 | Henrik Mikael Kristensen | | 01-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT |
Comment 5 | Gil Knutson | | 02-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT |
Comment 6 | Hagge | | 02-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT |
Comment 7 | Matt Sealey | | 02-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT |
|
Companies are copying Amiga's and TAO Group's ideas : Comment 8 of 13 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Alex Klauke on 02-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT | In reply to Comment 7 (Matt Sealey): > Comment 1 is exactly right: Amiga and Tao's plans are nothing at all original.
> BREW runs on Qualcomm phone chipsets. This is like Sun's MAJC (I think) Java
> running CPU, and Transmeta's morphcode technologies. The ability to run binary
> code that is different to that native to the underlying processor is NOT a new
> concept, or one anyone can "steal".
True, it is not an idea originating in 2001. Tao does this kind of things since 1992 and within 1995 there was a discussion on 'Taos' even within the
Amiga community (also as a possible new OS foundation... look at AmigaSDK.com also).
And BREW only brews on Qualcomms very own hardware chip ;-) We should go away from proprietary hardware.
> Add that to the fact that Tao *aren't* "making Sun's Java dream a reality",
> considering that Tao's JVM is no faster or better than IBM's JVM, or even
> Microsoft's JVM, in many regards, and is only an implementation of a small,
> for embedded systems and the like, subset of the full Java implementation that
> others can boast.
Comparing IBM JRE 1.1.8/1.3.0 to AmigaSDK's intentJTE (is pj 1.1.6, Java 2 in the works) shows not very much difference on my P133 on top of Linux and I have not seen AmigaDE running native anywhere, did _you_?
> Why don't we all stop deluding ourselves that Amiga are going to do something
> amazing? They missed the boat on this by about 5 years.
You're right here. Amiga missed on facelifting AmigaOS then (even since 1992).
Amiga-2000 at least let some work do (by H&P). And they concentrate not on reviving a basically 9 yr. old OS, but try something new. That is what is missing from any Amiga company within the last 5 years. And be not to sure that they will _not_ deliver anything amazing, explicitly including a desktop OS (and an OE for 1,5Mio. STB, 7Mio. PDAs, what else..?).
Maybe you get the point later this year. Hope so..
> Matt
Alex
ps: apologies for quoting nearly everything, it needed to be done ;-) |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|