19-Apr-2024 13:59 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Executive Update - St. Louis and BeyondANN.lu
Posted on 06-Feb-2001 22:33 GMT by Christian Kemp34 comments
View flat
View list
There's a new executive update available at Amiga. Bill McEwen says Contrary to the rumors and what many people are saying about our demise, or that we are going to have the same fate of the others before us, we have a big surprise for all of them, and promises that all will be known in six weeks at the St. Louis show.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Sir RUSH06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 2jer06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Scott Kurtz06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Hagge06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous Coward06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Sir RUSH06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Dave06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 9John Block06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Mikey C06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 11John Block06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 12AmigaPower06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 13AmigaPower06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 15hagge06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 16hagge06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 18Tron Man!!!07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Stefan07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Colin Wilson07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Executive Update - St. Louis and Beyond : Comment 22 of 34ANN.lu
Posted by Martin Baute on 07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 20 (Colin Wilson):
Erm, in fact this _is_ a problem. Remember when Apple denied Be the information on their G4 machines? Be couldn´t support the G4 architecture.
There´s more than being able to run on the target _CPU_ - I am confident that the Tao stuff runs on the PPC allright. But, to support the _machine_ (as in PowerMac *whateverthosenumbersmean*, Cube etc.), you have to have information about the _architecture_, like chipset, interrupt handling etc. This is done by the PII layer of the Tao system; and I seriously doubt that Jobs gave his thumbs up on an Apple PII. And without the OK from Apple, any hacked-together PII would be reverse-engineering, and as such an infringement in copyright.
Then again, I might be wrong on all this. Go ask Tao and Apple. ;-)
On a different note (in reply to post #12, to be exact): I am ashamed that people like you call themselves Amigians, too. It´s stupid enough to hop up and down chanting "aMiGa RuLeZ" and stuff like that, but your last line makes me feel really sick.
To end this post with something more cheerful: Amiga Inc. is now in business for a little over a year. When EsCom was in charge, a year was what it took them to present the ridiculous Walker design (and going bankrupt). When Gateway was in charge, a year was what it took them to present their QNX concept.
I feel that Bill and staff are taking big strides towards their goal. I hope they don´t get lost, and that they find enough supply on the road as they go.
My best wishes to them. As an IT professional, I would like to see an alternative to Windows (monopoly, monoculture, get-me-money-fast-but-don´t-ask-for-value), Linux (if people can understand it, it has too few options), and Apple (which, as a system, is so great and successful they even have MS Office, MS Internet Explorer and MS Outlook. Cool.).
;-)
Jump...
#23 Keith Blakemore-Noble
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 23Keith Blakemore-Noble07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 24James Jacobs08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 25WattsM08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Stew08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 28m0ns00n08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 29MAS08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 31tronman09-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Henrik Mikael Kristensen09-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 33John Payne09-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Martin Baute15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Back to Top