16-Apr-2024 14:42 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Executive Update - St. Louis and BeyondANN.lu
Posted on 06-Feb-2001 22:33 GMT by Christian Kemp34 comments
View flat
View list
There's a new executive update available at Amiga. Bill McEwen says Contrary to the rumors and what many people are saying about our demise, or that we are going to have the same fate of the others before us, we have a big surprise for all of them, and promises that all will be known in six weeks at the St. Louis show.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Sir RUSH06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 2jer06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Scott Kurtz06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Hagge06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous Coward06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Sir RUSH06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Dave06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 9John Block06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Mikey C06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 11John Block06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 12AmigaPower06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 13AmigaPower06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 15hagge06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 16hagge06-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 18Tron Man!!!07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Stefan07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Colin Wilson07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Martin Baute07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Keith Blakemore-Noble07-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 24James Jacobs08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 25WattsM08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Executive Update - St. Louis and Beyond : Comment 26 of 34ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 18 (Tron Man!!!):
I read your post and guess what? Ummmm...I don't think you did
very much reading! Alternative platforms are a great thing to
the Win/Tel stranglehold, however as I orginally stated this
is not what made the Mac popular with the average users, and
it is not going to be accepted by the majority of Mac users
as most do not have the knowledge to run a bloated version
of basterdized UNIX like this! Period...
That was the whole point!
I suggest that you spend more time scouring the fourms. I think
you've been reading the wrong pages and a few recent comments.
Perhaps you better take a gander at this link:
http://www.macosx.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=722
Here you will find numerous accounts of how miserably slow
it is even on the most powerful machines, etc.
It starts with this post, which I've included part of here:
Hello,
Actually I am glad that people are discussing this, but it raises a
HUGE issue with me.... First of all, I'm a UNIX systems integrator,
but I love the Macintosh interface....
It troubles me *tremendously* that Macintosh users are going to have to
contend with the UNIX shells, etc just to get something done.. This is
simply not what the Macintosh should be about....
I think that Pandoras Box has been opened here and loyal Macintosh users
are going to be fed up with this very quickly....
I've not seen one post yet siting the ease-of-use of OS-X, which is indeed
what the mac is suppose to be about.. Instead there are posts of stuff like:
"login as root"
"cd to /"
"chown on this"
etc...
As much as I love UNIX, I never wanted to see it on a Macintosh and this
really *really* is a shame for all Macintosh users..
<much more interesting stuff cut for brevity. However, I think you get the
picture! Again, this is NOTHING like the MacOS that people have been using
for years, and with a certain few "geeks" who will use this bloated monster,
again I state that Mac users will be bailing out in droves!>
Sincerely,
Greg Saylor
Senior Systems Integrator
Integrated Suport Services
Jump...
#29 MAS
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 27Stew08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 28m0ns00n08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 29MAS08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous08-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 31tronman09-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Henrik Mikael Kristensen09-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 33John Payne09-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Martin Baute15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Back to Top