19-Apr-2024 15:10 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Motd] MOTD 12/Feb/2001ANN.lu
Posted on 12-Feb-2001 19:38 GMT by Christian Kemp64 comments
View flat
View list
Things have been pretty slow behind the scenes at ANN. I still worked most of January 2001 and the past two weeks of February, so my free time was limited. My PC seems to be working okay now, but my dialup has been very unreliable and painfully slow (how many errors are normal in W2k's dialup status window? So far I have 143 for less than 200k transferred...). The DSL line is supposedly being installed "in a few weeks". Sounds oddly familiar. I finally found an Amiga sponsor again, so that my phone costs are almost covered. Thanks also to the individuals who offered donations - sorry I didn't get back to you - but I'm always reluctant to accept individual donations for a number of reasons I won't go into since space is limited. :) To wrap up this MOTD, I'm trying once more to find one or more reliable contributors to do a bit of moderation and article posting. Please apply via email.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Mark Olsen11-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Hassan Sultan12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Mark Olsen12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Perttu Kuukankorpi12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 5X12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Mark Olsen12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Perttu Kuukankorpi12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Dave12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 9nOw212-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Dave12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Christian Kemp12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Hassan Sultan12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Christian Kemp12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Mark Olsen12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Mark Olsen12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 18Mark Olsen12-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Mark Olsen13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Mark Olsen13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 24Mark Olsen13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 25Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Mark Olsen13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Mark Olsen13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Karl Hamilton13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Karl Hamilton13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 31Dave13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 33S Katz13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 35Steffan Katz13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 36christophe13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 37christophe13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 38Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 39Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 40Pede^FUP13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 41Dave13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 42Hassan Sultan13-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 43Dave14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 44christophe14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 45christophe14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 46Steffan Katz14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 47Colin Wilson14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 48Colin Wilson14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 49Ville Sarell14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 50Dave14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 51Hassan Sultan14-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 52Colin Wilson15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 53Hassan Sultan15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
MOTD 12/Feb/2001 : Comment 54 of 64ANN.lu
Posted by Mark Olsen on 15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 51 (Hassan Sultan):
> This long thread started after that I quietly told Mark Olsen that
> the problem CK had was not related to Win2k, there was no rant about
It is, you just don't seem to be able to comprehend that.
> the OS or whatever, and then Mr Olsen thought that with absolutely no
> knowledge about operating systems/kernels he could explain to a guy who
> work on this exact OS how much it is crap and buggy, all this with
OK, let's say I have absolutely no knowledge of anything, as you suggest, I don't even know how to use a computer.
So, as an average Joe dumbass(like you), I can see the following things:
Graphics operations are in kernel space(Just look in the task manager when moving windows)
When moving a window/scrolling something/whatever, the kernel CPU usage hits 100%
I move a window, modem lights in Windows flash red, the status window indicated a lot of errors.
Average joe luser sees a connection between moving windows and broken downloads, so he doesn't use the computer while he downloads.
> completely broken arguments.
Sure thing.
Just a note: Keep things out of kernel space, and since you didn't get it last time, I will repeat why:
- You starve other things, not good.
- Broken code BSODs Windows
And another thing, about that VBScript thing...
How useful is that? Not the slightest, except for writing automated LookOut Depress viruses.
How can one run a server without a shell? Or use a workstation effectively?
I have two 486s here running without keyboard and monitor etc.
One thing is thinking of how Win2k would run on a 486@66MHz with 16MB RAM(the one I run OpenBSD on atm) is one thing, but how would I admin it without moving the computers around all the time?
The other one, a 486@100MHz with 44MB RAM running Linux(Again, imagine Win2k on this one) has been running since it was installed 147 days ago! The OpenBSD box has been running since it was installed too. That's 39 days ago.
Jump...
#55 Hassan Sultan #56 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 55Hassan Sultan15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 56Anonymous15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 58Colin Wilson15-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 59Simon Webber17-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 60Colin Wilson17-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 61Hassan Sultan17-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 62Colin Wilson18-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 63Hassan Sultan18-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 64Bill Crawford18-Feb-2001 23:00 GMT
Back to Top