19-Apr-2024 11:55 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Motd] ANN abuseANN.lu
Posted on 13-Apr-2001 10:23 GMT by Christian Kemp29 comments
View flat
View list
As you might have noticed, messages of questionable content have been posted on ANN under fictious names, Fleecy's name, as well as my own name. In the latest case, the border between harmless joke and abuse/slander has clearly been crossed, and I have invoked abuse procedures. The ISP of the offending poster has been contacted, and I'm hoping they will take appropriate measures. Any future postings that fall under the same category (abuse/slander and/or impersonating some other person) will also yield the same reaction: removal of the offending posting without any further comment, contacting of the ISP, and if everything else fails, legal action. This clearly cannot continue.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1m0ns00n12-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
ANN abuse : Comment 2 of 29ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 12-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Well done. People are confused enough as it is without a bunch of faceless BS'ers stirring the pot. So some of it is "just a joke"? I believe that about 25% is a joke while the rest is a deliberate undermining of the community by inbred morons with no sex-life.
There is no excuse to post under someone else's name/handle and there is no excuse (apart from memory lapse) to post anonymously. If you don't have the balls to stand up and "show" your face then keep your rumours to yourself. And don't start a flame war about "free speech" - what about the rights of individuals to be protected from lies and abuse? Free speech is good when it's accurate and verifiable, otherwise it's just plain mis-information that has no place in a "NEWS" group/site.
Jump...
#8 chunky
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 3rdrumloa12-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Dave12-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 5Christian Kemp12-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Budda12-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7skal12-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 8chunky12-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Christian Kemp13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Darrin13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Darrin13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 12Tinman13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 13redrumloa13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14redrumloa13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Cockroach13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Hagge13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 18John Block13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 19chunky13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 20maybe_chunky_maybe_not13-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Darrin14-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 223seas14-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 23redrumloa14-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous14-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 25Darrin14-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Colin Wilson14-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Christer Jansson16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Christer Jansson16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 29XybeX17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Back to Top