24-Apr-2024 02:23 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga Inc Closes Down Another Pirate BBSANN.lu
Posted on 16-Apr-2001 11:30 GMT by Christian Kemp48 comments
View flat
View list
Via Moo Bunny: Amiga Inc. has closed down the amiga.rulez.org online pirate BBS. A bit of good news for few companies still selling/developing Amiga stuff.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Bianca Campbell15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Seehund15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Buzzy15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Christian15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 5David Shipman15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 6redrumloa15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7redrumloa15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 8redrumloa15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9yardo15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Hans-Joerg Frieden15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Michael Jantzen16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Amiga Inc Closes Down Another Pirate BBS : Comment 12 of 48ANN.lu
Posted by David Shipman on 16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 10 (Hans-Joerg Frieden):
re : console market
Actually I know a great many people who bought a PSX instead of an N64 purely because they could copy cds but not cartridges. Am I saying we should be lenient on piracy in the interests of attracting thieves? No. But if you don't acknowledge the reality of the matter (and that is : how *people* think), then you're not going to be able to make rational decisions. As a software developer, you are completely opposed to piracy. Of course, I agree with your standpoint 100%. On the other hand, a userbase of pirates is better than no userbase at all, isn't it? Even pirates are _potential_ purchasers of your software. Don't forget, just because someone copies one game/app doesn't mean they won't buy another.
Anyway, enough said
Jump...
#27 Splatt
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 13twice-a-day16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Kay Are Ulvestad16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Ben Hermans/Hyperion16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Hagge16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Hans-Joerg Frieden16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 19kriz16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 20twice-a-day16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 22DanDude17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 23Thomas Frieden17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 24Thomas Frieden17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 25Prefer not to17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Ville Sarell18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Splatt18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 28James Whelan18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 29Kay Are Ulvestad18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 30Kay Are Ulvestad18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 31Splatt19-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 32Splatt19-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 33Kay Are Ulvestad19-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 34James Whelan19-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 35Splatt20-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous20-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous20-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 38Extensor21-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 39Kay Are Ulvestad21-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 40Alex21-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 41James Whelan21-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous22-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 43Harlio22-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 44David Shipman23-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 45James Whelan23-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 46DanDude23-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 47Extensor23-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 48Watts04-May-2001 22:00 GMT
Back to Top