18-Apr-2024 03:07 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] Pentium IV Prototype at 3.5 GHzANN.lu
Posted on 29-Aug-2001 09:05 GMT by Christian Kemp41 comments
View flat
View list
Solar (BAUD) wrote: PPC vs x86, Intel vs AMD, believe me folks I´d like to see PPC rule the market, but this looks like x86 is here to stay. I think it´s interesting to see what will be tomorrow, even if it has little to do with Amiga today. Yes, I know that GHz isn´t everything, but that´s a *lot* of GHz to make up for with superior (?) architecture... From Heise Online:

"In the early morning, shortly after 8 AM local time, [Intel] presented a prototype of a 0.13µm Pentium-4 (Northwood), which - shortly - ran at 3.5 GHz.

On average, the IDF record breaking CPUs reach the market after roughly a year. The 2 GHz type that started production yesterday was also presented as a prototype on last year´s IDF. So we can expect the 3.5 GHz Pentium 4 in late summer 2002. In general, so Otellini, the architecture can be scaled up to 10 GHz."

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Hans-Joerg Frieden28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Ben Hermans/Hyperion28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Tinman28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 5koan28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Solar (BAUD)28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Graham28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 828-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9nOw228-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Amifan28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 11boingdude28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 12Nick28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Graham28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14Hans-Joerg Frieden28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Alain Coderre28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Ian Shurmer28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Christian Kemp28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Ian Shurmer28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 19Bart Vanhaeren28-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 20Richie29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 21sutro29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 22Luca29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 23nian29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 24David Shipman29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 25David Shipman29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Mike Pearson29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Mike Pearson29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 29Kjetil29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 30Chip29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 31dakang29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 32Thomas Frieden29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3329-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 34Hans-Joerg Frieden29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 35Ian Shurmer29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 36Tony Gore30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 37Thierry31-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 38Thierry Atheist31-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 39sutro02-Sep-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 40sutro02-Sep-2001 22:00 GMT
Pentium IV Prototype at 3.5 GHz : Comment 41 of 41ANN.lu
Posted by Mike Pearson on 02-Sep-2001 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 40 (sutro):
Various comments Re: to Previous comments. A Hodge-Podge.
Yes it is true that the 040's were too fast for the harddrive to spin up and now I have an '060 with a 10,000 Rpm seagate and it takes 3-4 reboots to give the harddrive time to spin up, it took 3 reboots for the IBM 7,200 rpm to spin up.
This is compounded by having OxyPatcher which requires a reboot to put the patch in the first command (?) space.
SCSI's are much better though the true advantages are lost on the Average consumer, and this includes most business. Not only is the transfer time better, but CPU usage is less because the hard disk has it's own chip, this is one of the reasons it is more expensive. If you are using other cpu intensive programs, this would be a benefit.
Also, your IDE transfer speed is only as great as ypur slowest IDE device. That is if you have an IDE ZIP drive attached, it isn't even ATAPI and hence any device attached to that bus will transfer only at the bus speed of the original IDE spec that rules the zip. That's one of the reasons some have an add-on extra IDE controller. That's why some of us buy scsi ZIPs.
My Seagate is quieter than any of my PC's and my Amiga 2500 case is never on. (I have no idea where it is anymore) Boy do they run HOT though, once it's been on for an hour, you can't pick it up, hence PC users should have extra coolers.
I also have replaced my scsi's less than my IDE drives. (I hope that's not a jinx!)
Jump...
TopPrevious commentbottom
Back to Top