19-Apr-2024 05:04 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] HP bound to quit PA-RISC CPU lineANN.lu
Posted on 30-Aug-2001 06:25 GMT by Christian Kemp17 comments
View flat
View list
Solar (BAUD) wrote: The PIV message posted earlier initiated some interesting comments, so I think this one can be just as interesting: HP dropping PA-RISC in favour of IA64 by 2004. From www.heise.de:
"Continuing development of the RISC CPUs keeps getting more and more difficult and expensive, while Itanium is just beginning it´s lifetime cycle", Brown [Market Communications Manager HP] backs up the HP decission. Moreover, so Brown, Itanium systems will get cheaper simply because of higher production numbers, as opposed to house-made PA-RISCs.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1m0ns00n29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3priest29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 5Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Gothic29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Karl Hamilton29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 8m0ns00n29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Amifan29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
HP bound to quit PA-RISC CPU line : Comment 11 of 17ANN.lu
Posted by Solar (BAUD) on 29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (m0ns00n):
The A2200 was such a bad design that all Commodore subsidiaries (UK, Germany etc.) refused to sell/support it, so the design was scrapped altogether. Perhaps the only occassion when Commodore HQ listened to what other people were saying.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 12Nick29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14Solar (BAUD)30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Solar (BAUD)30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Tronman31-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous31-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Back to Top