20-Apr-2024 06:52 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] HP bound to quit PA-RISC CPU lineANN.lu
Posted on 30-Aug-2001 06:25 GMT by Christian Kemp17 comments
View flat
View list
Solar (BAUD) wrote: The PIV message posted earlier initiated some interesting comments, so I think this one can be just as interesting: HP dropping PA-RISC in favour of IA64 by 2004. From www.heise.de:
"Continuing development of the RISC CPUs keeps getting more and more difficult and expensive, while Itanium is just beginning it´s lifetime cycle", Brown [Market Communications Manager HP] backs up the HP decission. Moreover, so Brown, Itanium systems will get cheaper simply because of higher production numbers, as opposed to house-made PA-RISCs.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1m0ns00n29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3priest29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 5Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Gothic29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Karl Hamilton29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 8m0ns00n29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Amifan29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 12Nick29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14Solar (BAUD)30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Solar (BAUD)30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
HP bound to quit PA-RISC CPU line : Comment 16 of 17ANN.lu
Posted by Tronman on 31-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (m0ns00n):
Any OS that isn't Windows failed on x86 because of Microsoft. In the private licence agreement signed by every hardware vendor (not that fakey thing you pretend to read when installing Windows), it is clearly and in no uncertain terms stated that you as a hardware vendor are NOT ALLOWED in ANY WAY to place ANY OTHER OS on any HD on which Windows will be installed and sold to a customer by you as the vendor. And when your OS is on 90+ percent of the computers and a vendor can be killed instantly by you yanking their right to sell said OS because they do something you don't like, well, that's where the abuse of a monopoly starts, and where the US gov't really missed the boat. That's what Gassee (sp?) said recently, and he's dead right.
That's why BeOS failed, and no vendors offer a dual-boot system with Linux or BeOS, even though market research shows that customers would love to have that choice. It is technically trivial to provide that choice, but we all know how M$ feels about competition of any kind.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 17Anonymous31-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Back to Top