20-Apr-2024 05:07 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] HP bound to quit PA-RISC CPU lineANN.lu
Posted on 30-Aug-2001 06:25 GMT by Christian Kemp17 comments
View flat
View list
Solar (BAUD) wrote: The PIV message posted earlier initiated some interesting comments, so I think this one can be just as interesting: HP dropping PA-RISC in favour of IA64 by 2004. From www.heise.de:
"Continuing development of the RISC CPUs keeps getting more and more difficult and expensive, while Itanium is just beginning it´s lifetime cycle", Brown [Market Communications Manager HP] backs up the HP decission. Moreover, so Brown, Itanium systems will get cheaper simply because of higher production numbers, as opposed to house-made PA-RISCs.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1m0ns00n29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3priest29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
HP bound to quit PA-RISC CPU line : Comment 4 of 17ANN.lu
Posted by Ben Hermans/Hyperion on 29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (m0ns00n):
The roadmap for RISC is becoming darker?
I'm sorry but you misinterpret completely. HP decided to ditch its own CPU line because they can't keep up with the competition, it's too expensive to develop it and foremost because they played a pivotal role in the development of IA64.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 5Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Gothic29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Karl Hamilton29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 8m0ns00n29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Amifan29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Solar (BAUD)29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 12Nick29-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14Solar (BAUD)30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Solar (BAUD)30-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Tronman31-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous31-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Back to Top