03-Oct-2023 11:20 GMT.
[Forum] "party on:-)" (R.S.)ANN.lu
Posted on 02-Oct-2001 19:56 GMT by Martin Heine233 comments
View flat
View list
(Before someone again complains that I'm sharing my opinion "everywhere": I just decided to paste here what I wrote in comp.sys.amiga.misc because of Christian's call for articles.)
The article contains quick and dirty translations of comments made yesterday and today by Mr. Haage and Ralph Schmidt at amiga-news.de, since I thought non-german-speakers might be interested in this, too. Newsgroup-article #1:

To try to compensate at least a little bit the advantages of those Amigans who speak German (and therefore often get easier to rumours, facts, etc., because of the importance of german companies and individuals for the Amiga-market), I thought it might be useful to translate a few statements made at amiga-news.de today.

While Eyetech and H&P accuse each other for the A1/AOS4-delays (one says the hardware is missing, one says the OS4 is missing), Mr. Haage made (among others) the following comments (no warranty for the translation!):

[Mr. Haage (H) comments some rumours (R)]

H: "The interest in OS4.0 we have NEVER lost. But we've never been and are not convinced of the profitability of the project if the concepts won't be changed."

R: "They (H&P) are just the executing organ, all decisions are made by Amiga Inc."

H: "Correct. [...]"

R: "Amiga Inc. displays regarding Communication with their partners "certain" deficits."

H: "Deficits is nicely said. But it's correct!"

R: "Failing to come / insufficient payments from Amiga Inc."

H: "Before payments could be made, contracts have to be made. That far, however, we aren't yet. Regarding which I clearly want to emphasize that WE do not delay."


H: "To be able to be partners to an agreement, one needs contracts - and that is not Amiga Inc.'s strong point."

[Another comment from Mr. Haage]

R: "Is the date told by Alan Redhouse [Eyetech] for the completion of OS4.0 ("november, but probably not the 1st") possible in your opinion?"

H: "Only if it would be right now possible to work towards that date. But the conditions for this don't exist. Maybe a wonder happens, but I don't expect it."

No wonder that those like me, who've been suspicious regarding AI in favour of MorphOS/Pegasos for some time already, unfortunately feel confirmed more and more. Also no wonder that Ralph Schmidt is enjoying this soap opera from AI, H&P and Eyetech, his first comment has been the one quoted as the subject: "party on:-)".

So, after translating Mr. Haage's point of view, I'll also think I should quote from one of Ralph's comments, too. He (RS) answers to a comment by Mr. Haage (JH):

JH: "In an exclusive x86 AmigaOS version we aren't interested."

RS: "No? :-) Do you think we don't get what you proposed internally already in August? :-)"


RS: "As you've been also told already by a person from Amiga Inc. some monthes ago... you have no future as Amiga OS vendor."

My personal guess is that the main problem seems to be Amiga Inc., i.e. especially their lack of money. So after them already given up on their plans regarding DE being their future OS many monthes ago, it seems their plan to survive as a content vendor for PDAs seems to be not that successful, too (Alan Redhouse, too, does confirm in his statement that AI still has the already known financial problems). If companies like H&P do speak that way about AI already in the public as Mr. Haage did today at amiga-news.de (I just translated a little bit of it), I exprect the worst regarding AI's future.

Therefore it really seems the Amiga-market's future might be just those two ones Ralph outlined: an emulation-based x86 one by H&P and the PPC one covered by MorphOS.


Newsgroup-article #2:

Some "second helping" - the "party" goes on:

(Again no warranty for the 'quick and dirty' translation.)

Michael Garlich (Titan Computer) in reply to Mr. Haage:

"You should restrain yourself on your statements against Mr. Schmidt! Only you are to blame for the current situation - if you had actually shown your much propagated readiness for cooperation last year in september, it would not have been come that far. Despite all adverse things Mr. Schmidt contrary to you had been willing to cooperate under leadership of Amiga Inc. !!!"

And another reply by Ralph to Mr. Haage:

"[...] You operate on other levels which the normal user doesn't notice. (dealers, influence on Amiga Inc., threats with licences, internal mailing lists, influence on a certain person and a certain company)"


Newsgroup-article #3:

I think balance requires me to continue the translation at least one more time, i.e. especially regarding the repeated offer below by Mr. Haage to try to come to a cooperation. Of course everyone draws his own conclusions, H&P-fans may say "didn't I tell you, just Ralph is the bad guy" (although there's on the other hand the, today repeated, version by for example Mr. Garlich who said that Mr. Haage would have prevented exactly this last year), while the other side may say he's just lying or trying another trick. My personal conclusion is that Mr. Haage may just get cold feet because of the apparently very bad financial situation at AI and its consequences for another Amiga-PPC-future besides MorphOS.

Well, here again some quick and dirty translations from the very same thread of comments at amiga-news.de as before; again, no warranty.

1. Mr. Haage:

He suggests to accept an invitation made partly humorously by amiga-news.de's Petra Struck to Mr. Haage and Ralph to meet at her home for a dinner and try to come to an agreement.

(But Ralph did already say in a comment before he'd never again cooperate with Mr. Haage, because of the well-known history and because H&P would just have nothing to offer that would be of interest for the bplan/Morphos-crew. (Although I think Ralph underestimates the value of "the name", but on the other hand I don't know how much, if any, influence H&P has regarding this.))

2. Ralph:

(It has been said before that by saying H&P (and Hyperion) would have nothing to offer the MorphOS-team could be interested in, they would cut out "StormC4, Arteffect, Genesis, Olsen's TCP/IP Stack, OS 3.9 licences" and Hyperion's products.)

" 1) We have with the PPC-MorphOS-GCC our own development system, [...].
2) I wouldn't know what's that unique with ArtEffect. [...]
3) Genesis is a GUI surface and the TCP/IP stack belongs to Tomi Ollila, which we do also have as a PPC version.
4) Olsen's TCP/IP stack is controlled by Olsen and nobody else. And we do have a *very* good relationship with Olaf.
5) Amiga users do already own 3.1, 3.5 or 3.9 and it's left up to them of they continue to use it until a completely new WB exists.
6) MorphOS as AmigaOS 4.x was massively opposed by Hyperion since november 2000 and in summer it was said that they'd never would be porting Warp3d to MorphOS, when Amiga Inc. suggested them this. This decision is left up to them for what they want to develop something... The consequence is just that they don't play any role in our plans. Therefore we plan an own 3D solution. Warp3d is only that long important as new games support it.
9) As I said already... H&P are free to offer their applications for MorphOS also. *We* won't hinder anyone from developing applications for MorphOS. SDKs from us always will be free.
10) With Papyrus we'll have a real office-package with word-processor."

3. Mr. Haage:

Replying to the comment by Mr. Garlich (see earlier in this thread), Mr. Haage says he wouldn't know about what Mr. Garlich would be speaking.

4. Ralph:

(He was asked if Nova Design or Paul Nolan would have announced support for MorphOS already.)

"We have also spoken with Kermit Woodal several times. Since he's also closely related with Merlancia, there are certainly possibilities. :-) Paul Nolan does have a key and a development system since last year... [...]"
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1gz01-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Bill Hoggett01-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Ralph Schmidt02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Joe "Floid" Kanowitz02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 5Bill Hoggett02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Bill Hoggett02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Amifan02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 8Ben Yoris/Hyperion02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Samface02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Ben Hermans/Hyperion Entertainment02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Kelli21702-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 12Ralph Schmidt02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Ralph Schmidt02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14smith_rouelle02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15David Scheibler02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 16PC user02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Ralph Schmidt02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Amifan02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 19Amifan02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 20David Scheibler02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Sinan Gurkan02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 22Sinan Gurkan02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 23Ralph Schmidt02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 24Ben Yoris/Hyperion02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 25Thomas Frieden02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Hans-Joerg Frieden02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Ralph Schmidt02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Martin Heine02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 29Paul Heams02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 30geezuz02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 31David Scheibler02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 32Ben Hermans/Hyperion02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 33Ralph Schmidt02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 34Kay Are Ulvestad02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 35Paul Heams02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 36Johan Rönnblom02-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 37Adam Ceremuga03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 38Richie03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 39Solar (BAUD)03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 40Ben Yoris/Hyperion03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 41Ben Yoris/Hyperion03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 42Sinan Gurkan03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 43kriz03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 47Hans-Joerg Frieden03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 48Roald Seelemeijer03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 49smith_rouelle03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 50Agimax03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 51Lennart Fridén03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 52smith_rouelle03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 53Graham03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 54smith_rouelle03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 55Ben Yoris03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 56Anonymous03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 57Ben Yoris/Hyperion03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 58Ralph Schmidt03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 60Sinan Gurkan03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 61Ben Yoris/Hyperion03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 62Graham03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 63Lennart Fridén03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 64smith_rouelle03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 65den03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 66Alkis Tsapanidis03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 67Alkis Tsapanidis03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 68Lennart Fridén03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 69Alkis Tsapanidis03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 70Lennart Fridén03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 71Alkis Tsapanidis03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 72Adam Waldenberg03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 73Stefan Lorenz (DJLorry)03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 74Solar (BAUD)03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 75Mike Veroukis03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 76Mart03-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 77Lars Nelson04-Oct-2001 18:21 GMT
Comment 78Xemos04-Oct-2001 18:39 GMT
Comment 79Muffin04-Oct-2001 18:45 GMT
Comment 80amorel04-Oct-2001 20:06 GMT
Comment 81Xemos04-Oct-2001 20:14 GMT
Comment 82AdmV0rl0n04-Oct-2001 22:13 GMT
Comment 83Anton Reinauer05-Oct-2001 00:25 GMT
Comment 84Joe User05-Oct-2001 01:44 GMT
Comment 85adam ceremuga05-Oct-2001 04:07 GMT
Comment 86Samface05-Oct-2001 04:31 GMT
Comment 87Provocative05-Oct-2001 05:02 GMT
Comment 88Don Cox05-Oct-2001 06:59 GMT
Comment 89Ralph Schmidt05-Oct-2001 07:56 GMT
Comment 90Graham05-Oct-2001 08:13 GMT
Comment 91Graham05-Oct-2001 08:19 GMT
Comment 92Graham05-Oct-2001 08:20 GMT
Comment 93Joe user05-Oct-2001 08:52 GMT
Comment 94Sinan Gurkan05-Oct-2001 09:15 GMT
Comment 95Lennart Fridén05-Oct-2001 09:48 GMT
Comment 96Lennart Fridén05-Oct-2001 09:49 GMT
Comment 97Lennart Fridén05-Oct-2001 09:53 GMT
Comment 98tinman05-Oct-2001 10:17 GMT
Comment 99David Gerber05-Oct-2001 10:36 GMT
Comment 100Sinan Gurkan05-Oct-2001 10:44 GMT
Comment 101Sinan Gurkan05-Oct-2001 10:47 GMT
Comment 102Lennart Fridén05-Oct-2001 10:58 GMT
Comment 103Samface05-Oct-2001 11:06 GMT
Comment 104Graham05-Oct-2001 11:13 GMT
Comment 105Ralph Schmidt05-Oct-2001 11:16 GMT
Comment 106Anonymous05-Oct-2001 11:43 GMT
Comment 107Anonymous05-Oct-2001 11:52 GMT
Comment 108Ralph Schmidt05-Oct-2001 11:54 GMT
Comment 109the man in the shadows05-Oct-2001 11:56 GMT
Comment 110Ralph Schmidt05-Oct-2001 12:50 GMT
Comment 111Mike Veroukis05-Oct-2001 13:05 GMT
Comment 112the man in the shadows05-Oct-2001 13:20 GMT
Comment 113David Scheibler05-Oct-2001 13:37 GMT
Comment 114the man in the shadows05-Oct-2001 13:47 GMT
Comment 115David Scheibler05-Oct-2001 13:52 GMT
Comment 116Darrin05-Oct-2001 14:15 GMT
Comment 117adam ceremuga05-Oct-2001 14:17 GMT
Comment 118Joe user05-Oct-2001 14:18 GMT
Comment 119the man in the shadows05-Oct-2001 14:19 GMT
Comment 120Mike Veroukis05-Oct-2001 14:56 GMT
Comment 121JoBBo05-Oct-2001 14:58 GMT
Comment 122David Scheibler05-Oct-2001 14:58 GMT
Comment 123Bif05-Oct-2001 15:19 GMT
Comment 124Ralph Schmidt05-Oct-2001 16:03 GMT
Comment 125Martin Heine05-Oct-2001 16:33 GMT
Comment 126John Atkins05-Oct-2001 16:39 GMT
Comment 127Martin Blom05-Oct-2001 16:39 GMT
Comment 128Mike Veroukis05-Oct-2001 16:42 GMT
Comment 129Ralph Schmidt05-Oct-2001 16:50 GMT
Comment 130Mike Veroukis05-Oct-2001 16:52 GMT
Comment 131Anonymous05-Oct-2001 17:44 GMT
Comment 132Martin Blom05-Oct-2001 17:47 GMT
Comment 133Mike Veroukis05-Oct-2001 18:15 GMT
Comment 134Sinan Gurkan05-Oct-2001 18:49 GMT
Comment 135AdmV0rl0n05-Oct-2001 19:50 GMT
Comment 136Amifan05-Oct-2001 20:12 GMT
Comment 137John Atkins05-Oct-2001 20:49 GMT
Comment 138the man in the shadows05-Oct-2001 21:25 GMT
Comment 139Xemos05-Oct-2001 21:33 GMT
Comment 140Golem06-Oct-2001 00:04 GMT
Comment 141the man in the shadows06-Oct-2001 00:36 GMT
Comment 142adam ceremuga06-Oct-2001 01:42 GMT
Comment 143Sinan Gurkan06-Oct-2001 03:26 GMT
Comment 144Logan06-Oct-2001 03:55 GMT
Comment 145Sinan Gurkan06-Oct-2001 04:40 GMT
Comment 146David Scheibler06-Oct-2001 08:28 GMT
Comment 147Ralph Schmidt06-Oct-2001 08:52 GMT
Comment 148Ralph Schmidt06-Oct-2001 09:05 GMT
Comment 149Mahen06-Oct-2001 10:08 GMT
Comment 150Bill Hoggett06-Oct-2001 11:33 GMT
Comment 151adam ceremuga06-Oct-2001 11:49 GMT
Comment 152Ralph Schmidt06-Oct-2001 12:38 GMT
Comment 153Samface06-Oct-2001 14:21 GMT
Comment 154David Scheibler06-Oct-2001 14:55 GMT
Comment 155Troels Ersking06-Oct-2001 15:26 GMT
Comment 156Troels Ersking06-Oct-2001 15:49 GMT
Comment 157David Scheibler06-Oct-2001 16:03 GMT
Comment 158Ralph Schmidt06-Oct-2001 16:27 GMT
Comment 159Lennart Fridén06-Oct-2001 18:43 GMT
Comment 160Lennart Fridén06-Oct-2001 18:46 GMT
Comment 161David Scheibler06-Oct-2001 19:17 GMT
Comment 162Smith Rouelle06-Oct-2001 19:18 GMT
Comment 163the man in the shadows06-Oct-2001 20:30 GMT
Comment 164David Scheibler06-Oct-2001 20:55 GMT
Comment 165anonymous06-Oct-2001 22:38 GMT
Comment 166the man in the shadows06-Oct-2001 23:53 GMT
Comment 167priest07-Oct-2001 05:15 GMT
Comment 168Sinan Gurkan07-Oct-2001 06:12 GMT
Comment 169C.Uceda07-Oct-2001 06:39 GMT
Comment 170David Scheibler07-Oct-2001 08:32 GMT
Comment 171David Scheibler07-Oct-2001 08:32 GMT
Comment 172Mekanix07-Oct-2001 10:04 GMT
Comment 173Samface07-Oct-2001 10:40 GMT
Comment 174Ralph Schmidt07-Oct-2001 10:43 GMT
Comment 175Samface07-Oct-2001 10:50 GMT
Comment 176Ralph Schmidt07-Oct-2001 10:52 GMT
Comment 177Adam Ceremuga07-Oct-2001 10:54 GMT
Comment 178Ralph Schmidt07-Oct-2001 11:17 GMT
Comment 179David Scheibler07-Oct-2001 11:21 GMT
Comment 180Mahen07-Oct-2001 11:29 GMT
Comment 181Ralph Schmidt07-Oct-2001 11:38 GMT
Comment 182the man in the shadows07-Oct-2001 15:49 GMT
Comment 183the man in the shadows07-Oct-2001 15:49 GMT
Comment 184Sinan Gurkan07-Oct-2001 16:54 GMT
Comment 185Mekanix07-Oct-2001 18:49 GMT
Comment 186Jürgen Lange07-Oct-2001 19:19 GMT
Comment 187Anonymous07-Oct-2001 20:14 GMT
Comment 188Ralph Schmidt07-Oct-2001 20:14 GMT
Comment 189Ralph Schmidt07-Oct-2001 20:53 GMT
Comment 190Solneman07-Oct-2001 20:54 GMT
Comment 191Smith Rouelle07-Oct-2001 21:15 GMT
Comment 192Anonymous08-Oct-2001 02:43 GMT
Comment 193Mekanix08-Oct-2001 06:03 GMT
Comment 194Samface08-Oct-2001 06:13 GMT
Comment 195Sinan Gurkan08-Oct-2001 07:03 GMT
Comment 196adam ceremuga08-Oct-2001 07:19 GMT
Comment 197Smith Rouelle08-Oct-2001 07:37 GMT
Comment 198Smith Rouelle08-Oct-2001 07:39 GMT
Comment 199Samface08-Oct-2001 07:54 GMT
Comment 200Samface08-Oct-2001 08:39 GMT
Comment 201adam ceremuga08-Oct-2001 09:38 GMT
Comment 202adam ceremuga08-Oct-2001 09:40 GMT
Comment 203Martin Heine08-Oct-2001 09:48 GMT
Comment 204Samface08-Oct-2001 09:55 GMT
Comment 205Mekanix08-Oct-2001 13:50 GMT
Comment 206Mekanix08-Oct-2001 13:57 GMT
Comment 207anonymous08-Oct-2001 14:43 GMT
Comment 208anonymous08-Oct-2001 14:46 GMT
Comment 209Mekanix08-Oct-2001 15:01 GMT
Comment 210Smith Rouelle08-Oct-2001 18:01 GMT
Comment 211Smithy08-Oct-2001 18:29 GMT
Comment 212Steff08-Oct-2001 21:47 GMT
Comment 213Anonymous08-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 214Anonymous08-Oct-2001 22:21 GMT
Comment 215the man in the shadows09-Oct-2001 01:07 GMT
Comment 216Len Carsner09-Oct-2001 01:16 GMT
Comment 217Samface09-Oct-2001 04:42 GMT
Comment 218Sinan Gurkan09-Oct-2001 05:07 GMT
Comment 219the man in the shadows09-Oct-2001 05:12 GMT
Comment 220Lennart Fridén09-Oct-2001 05:22 GMT
Comment 221Lennart Fridén09-Oct-2001 05:28 GMT
Comment 222Agimax09-Oct-2001 07:36 GMT
Comment 223Agimax09-Oct-2001 07:54 GMT
Comment 224priest09-Oct-2001 08:36 GMT
Comment 225Ralph Schmidt09-Oct-2001 09:37 GMT
Comment 226Ralph Schmidt09-Oct-2001 10:11 GMT
Comment 227the man in the shadows09-Oct-2001 12:11 GMT
Comment 228To set-up the clocks about delays debate09-Oct-2001 15:18 GMT
Comment 229Anonymous10-Oct-2001 01:07 GMT
Comment 230Anonymous12-Oct-2001 07:50 GMT
Comment 231Anonymous13-Oct-2001 02:39 GMT
Comment 232pixie07-Apr-2004 16:43 GMT
Comment 233MIKE08-Apr-2004 01:42 GMT
Back to Top