24-Apr-2024 21:28 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] AmigaOS XL: Sale started on 18.10.ANN.lu
Posted on 24-Oct-2001 10:17 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä54 comments
View flat
View list
Haage & Partner announce: "Sales of AmigaOS XL started on Thursday, the 18.10. The delivery of the pre-orders will last until the end of the week. Thank you very much for your understanding. Last weekend the new version was introduced and sold at Pianeta 2001 in Empoli (Italy)."
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Dave24-Oct-2001 11:27 GMT
Comment 2Loki24-Oct-2001 14:50 GMT
Comment 3Alkis Tsapanidis24-Oct-2001 15:00 GMT
Comment 4Bill Hoggett24-Oct-2001 16:37 GMT
Comment 5Andrew Deacon24-Oct-2001 16:51 GMT
Comment 6zootzoot24-Oct-2001 17:02 GMT
Comment 7zootzoot24-Oct-2001 17:24 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous24-Oct-2001 17:32 GMT
Comment 9zootzoot24-Oct-2001 17:46 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous24-Oct-2001 18:35 GMT
Comment 11Jürgen Lange24-Oct-2001 18:38 GMT
Comment 12Jürgen Lange24-Oct-2001 18:45 GMT
Comment 13Jürgen Lange24-Oct-2001 18:51 GMT
Comment 14Jürgen Lange24-Oct-2001 19:03 GMT
Comment 15Shawn24-Oct-2001 19:18 GMT
Comment 16ROTFLMAO!24-Oct-2001 19:21 GMT
Comment 17redrumloa24-Oct-2001 20:01 GMT
Comment 18Andrew Deacon24-Oct-2001 20:12 GMT
Comment 19Andrew Deacon24-Oct-2001 20:18 GMT
Comment 20Bill Hoggett24-Oct-2001 20:41 GMT
Comment 21Bill Hoggett24-Oct-2001 20:56 GMT
Comment 22Alkis Tsapanidis24-Oct-2001 21:13 GMT
Comment 23Alkis Tsapanidis24-Oct-2001 21:24 GMT
Comment 24zootzoot24-Oct-2001 21:28 GMT
Comment 25Frank Livadaros24-Oct-2001 22:55 GMT
AmigaOS XL: Sale started on 18.10. : Comment 26 of 54ANN.lu
Posted by mark on 24-Oct-2001 23:33 GMT
In reply to Comment 25 (Frank Livadaros):
Your points are correct - Amithlon faces competition from other systems such as Windows, and will struggle to attract developers. But this is true of any new Amiga hardware too.
Piracy - this will exist on new Amiga PPC hardware too, I see no evidence that Amithlon users are more likely to pirate software.
As far as the argument that Amithlon users would rather use the Windows version of an application or game, I would guess that many Amiga owners (current, or future PPC owners) will also have a PC lying around.. they are cheap and plentiful enough these days. So why would they buy Amiga software when they could run the Windows version? Indeed, why would they buy Amiga hardware at all, when the PC hardware is produced "sooner and cheaper"?
If we're assuming that a market exists for those wanting to run AmigaOS and its Amiga software (as we must if we are to assume anyone wants future PPC Amigas), then there is a market for Amithlon, and software to run on it (be it 68k or x86 optimised).
Also if I'm running Amithlon on a PC, all things being equal I would rather have the Amiga version of something to save me having to reboot into Windows (not to mention preferring to use software under AmigaOS).
How hardcore and fanaticized does one have to be to not buy a PC, and instead wait for a PPC Amiga, and then wait longer still for an Amiga version of the software, or just *ignore* some good PC hardware and Windows software just because he wants to use Workbench instead?
You describe someone running Amithlon without using another PC OS as an "extreme fanatic", but what about buying expensive Amiga-specific hardware, without using a PC OS?
AmigaOS on Amiga-specific hardware has competition, from both other software and other hardware companies.
As far as PCTask is concerned, were your reasons for emulating because Windows was your preferred choice of OS and PCTask was the fastest way in existance to run Windows and its applications, or because there were a few applications you needed to run that didn't exist on the Amiga?
I don't have anything particularly against the idea of Amiga specific hardware btw, I just feel all of your points apply just as much to that as they do to Amithlon.
Jump...
#31 Shawn
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 27Jürgen Lange25-Oct-2001 00:54 GMT
Comment 28Shawn25-Oct-2001 01:16 GMT
Comment 29Shawn25-Oct-2001 01:20 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous25-Oct-2001 01:30 GMT
Comment 31Shawn25-Oct-2001 01:34 GMT
Comment 32Jürgen Lange25-Oct-2001 02:18 GMT
Comment 33CumGuzzler25-Oct-2001 03:03 GMT
Comment 34EyeAm25-Oct-2001 03:55 GMT
Comment 35priest25-Oct-2001 04:53 GMT
Comment 36priest25-Oct-2001 05:06 GMT
Comment 37Bill Hoggett25-Oct-2001 05:11 GMT
Comment 38Solar (BAUD)25-Oct-2001 05:45 GMT
Comment 39Solar (BAUD)25-Oct-2001 05:47 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous25-Oct-2001 06:35 GMT
Comment 41Brecht25-Oct-2001 06:41 GMT
Comment 42Dave25-Oct-2001 06:50 GMT
Comment 43Mika Hanhijärvi25-Oct-2001 06:52 GMT
Comment 44Dave25-Oct-2001 06:56 GMT
Comment 45Dave25-Oct-2001 07:00 GMT
Comment 46Mika Hanhijärvi25-Oct-2001 07:02 GMT
Comment 47Dave25-Oct-2001 07:02 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous25-Oct-2001 10:03 GMT
Comment 49John Block25-Oct-2001 11:01 GMT
Comment 50Dave25-Oct-2001 11:08 GMT
Comment 51David Scheibler25-Oct-2001 16:07 GMT
Comment 52redrumloa25-Oct-2001 19:21 GMT
Comment 53Brecht (darklite)25-Oct-2001 19:25 GMT
Comment 54redrumloa26-Oct-2001 00:58 GMT
Back to Top