24-Apr-2024 14:26 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Eyetech clarifies AmigaOne statementANN.lu
Posted on 31-Oct-2001 15:50 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä126 comments
View flat
View list
Alan Redhouse of Eyetech clarified some of the confusion surrounding their latest AmigaOne statement in a comment here. I've posted it again below for those who don't read the comments section.

I try to use the clearest possible English in the status update but I have obviously failed to get the message across properly to everybody :(

Nowhere in my update does it say that OS4.0 had not started - and of course quite a lot of work *has* been done - but that the original plan required funding for OS4.0 to be *FINISHED*, and Amiga Inc had other priorities with their restricted funding. Bill has made no secret of the financial constraints that Amiga Inc were under at his public presentations at St Louis and Sacramento this year.

What I said is that WE decided to put development of the A1 on ice UNTIL we had a guarantee of a FINISH date of OS4.0. Of course development did not suddenly halt immediately, as we were all expecting Amiga Inc to obtain funding 'any day now'. But eventually other revenue-earning priorities took over.

I have absolutely no difficulties with any of Amiga's decisions or actions. They are exactly the same sort of business decisions that I would have made in their position.

We went into the AmigaOne project with our eyes wide open knowing the risks associated with events outside our control, and in no way hold Amiga Inc responsible for OUR decision to suspend development of the A1. In fact - again as I said in our update - we have all been trying very hard to obtain an all round satisfactory resolution to an OS4.0 completion date that would allow us to complete the A1 development and roll out into production. And no, there is no point in announcing that a potential crisis exists whilst there is still very real progress towards a resolution being made.

We obtained the agreement in principle earlier this week. This obtained, I wanted to set the record straight immediately to dispel some of the rumours and make sure that nobody made long journeys to WoA-SE on false expectations. As it is WoA-SE attendees will witness an historic contract signing.

Much of OS4.0 was planned to be implemented using the CSPPC in parallel with the development of the AmigaOne hardware. The decision to expand the market for OS4.0 was an integral part of the 'no upfront cost to Amiga' part of the agreement.

Hope this helps

Alan

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1IanG31-Oct-2001 16:34 GMT
Comment 2Cyberwlf31-Oct-2001 16:35 GMT
Comment 3TimeWillTell31-Oct-2001 17:08 GMT
Comment 4JW31-Oct-2001 18:32 GMT
Comment 5David Scheibler31-Oct-2001 21:14 GMT
Comment 6LadJet31-Oct-2001 21:34 GMT
Comment 7Johan Rönnblom31-Oct-2001 22:22 GMT
Comment 8kjetil31-Oct-2001 23:26 GMT
Comment 9Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 00:04 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous01-Nov-2001 00:40 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous01-Nov-2001 01:06 GMT
Comment 12NM01-Nov-2001 01:18 GMT
Comment 13Dave01-Nov-2001 06:54 GMT
Comment 14Frederik Yssing01-Nov-2001 07:07 GMT
Comment 15AmiDelf01-Nov-2001 07:33 GMT
Comment 16Solar (BAUD)01-Nov-2001 08:02 GMT
Comment 17Exasperated01-Nov-2001 08:11 GMT
Comment 18priest01-Nov-2001 09:33 GMT
Comment 19Jürgen Lange01-Nov-2001 10:02 GMT
Comment 20Rik Sweeney01-Nov-2001 10:29 GMT
Comment 21David Scheibler01-Nov-2001 10:35 GMT
Comment 22Kay Are Ulvestad01-Nov-2001 10:41 GMT
Comment 23David Gerber01-Nov-2001 10:58 GMT
Comment 24AmiDelf01-Nov-2001 11:00 GMT
Comment 25adam ceremuga01-Nov-2001 11:04 GMT
Comment 26Samface01-Nov-2001 11:32 GMT
Comment 27Solar (BAUD)01-Nov-2001 11:37 GMT
Comment 28Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 11:37 GMT
Comment 29Solar (BAUD)01-Nov-2001 11:39 GMT
Comment 30Samface01-Nov-2001 11:52 GMT
Comment 31Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 12:16 GMT
Comment 32Samface01-Nov-2001 12:17 GMT
Comment 33Alkis Tsapanidis01-Nov-2001 12:18 GMT
Comment 34Samface01-Nov-2001 12:22 GMT
Comment 35Richie01-Nov-2001 12:28 GMT
Comment 36priest01-Nov-2001 12:33 GMT
Comment 37Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 12:34 GMT
Comment 38Richie01-Nov-2001 12:35 GMT
Comment 39Graham01-Nov-2001 12:39 GMT
Comment 40Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 12:41 GMT
Comment 41AdmV01-Nov-2001 12:47 GMT
Comment 42Graham01-Nov-2001 12:54 GMT
Comment 43Graham01-Nov-2001 12:57 GMT
Comment 44John Block01-Nov-2001 13:07 GMT
Comment 45David Scheibler01-Nov-2001 13:11 GMT
Comment 46Graham01-Nov-2001 13:12 GMT
Comment 47Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 13:13 GMT
Comment 48John Block01-Nov-2001 13:14 GMT
Comment 49Alan Croft01-Nov-2001 13:15 GMT
Comment 50Graham01-Nov-2001 13:17 GMT
Comment 51Menthos01-Nov-2001 13:23 GMT
Comment 52Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 13:25 GMT
Comment 53dark ness01-Nov-2001 13:28 GMT
Comment 54priest01-Nov-2001 13:38 GMT
Comment 55Graham01-Nov-2001 13:41 GMT
Comment 56Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 13:42 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous01-Nov-2001 13:43 GMT
Comment 58Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 13:50 GMT
Comment 59Graham01-Nov-2001 13:55 GMT
Comment 60Emmanuel Lesueur01-Nov-2001 13:56 GMT
Comment 61Graham01-Nov-2001 14:01 GMT
Comment 62Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 14:04 GMT
Comment 63Emmanuel Lesueur01-Nov-2001 14:05 GMT
Comment 64Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 14:06 GMT
Comment 65Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 14:08 GMT
Comment 66Graham01-Nov-2001 14:14 GMT
Comment 67Graham01-Nov-2001 14:19 GMT
Comment 68priest01-Nov-2001 14:31 GMT
Comment 69Samface01-Nov-2001 14:38 GMT
Comment 70Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 14:59 GMT
Comment 71Samface01-Nov-2001 15:12 GMT
Comment 72HammerD01-Nov-2001 15:30 GMT
Comment 73HammerD01-Nov-2001 15:34 GMT
Comment 74Samface01-Nov-2001 15:49 GMT
Comment 75Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 15:58 GMT
Comment 76Jürgen Lange01-Nov-2001 16:08 GMT
Comment 77Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 16:09 GMT
Comment 78Samface01-Nov-2001 16:09 GMT
Comment 79Graham01-Nov-2001 16:11 GMT
Comment 80Don Cox01-Nov-2001 16:17 GMT
Comment 81Samface01-Nov-2001 16:19 GMT
Comment 82Ralph Schmidt01-Nov-2001 16:26 GMT
Comment 83Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 16:30 GMT
Comment 84Samface01-Nov-2001 16:30 GMT
Comment 85Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 16:34 GMT
Comment 86Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 16:36 GMT
Comment 87Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 16:39 GMT
Comment 88Graham01-Nov-2001 16:54 GMT
Comment 89Graham01-Nov-2001 17:02 GMT
Comment 90Samface01-Nov-2001 17:02 GMT
Comment 91Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 17:15 GMT
Comment 92Emmanuel Lesueur01-Nov-2001 17:22 GMT
Comment 93Anonymous01-Nov-2001 17:25 GMT
Comment 94Samface01-Nov-2001 17:29 GMT
Comment 95Ralph Schmidt01-Nov-2001 17:33 GMT
Comment 96Samface01-Nov-2001 17:58 GMT
Comment 97Georg Steger01-Nov-2001 18:10 GMT
Comment 98PaulT01-Nov-2001 18:11 GMT
Comment 99Alcemyst01-Nov-2001 18:35 GMT
Comment 100Graham01-Nov-2001 20:11 GMT
Comment 101Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 20:12 GMT
Comment 102Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 20:25 GMT
Comment 103Richie01-Nov-2001 20:30 GMT
Comment 104David Scheibler01-Nov-2001 20:40 GMT
Comment 105Alcemyst01-Nov-2001 20:55 GMT
Comment 106Emmanuel Lesueur01-Nov-2001 21:08 GMT
Comment 107Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 21:14 GMT
Comment 108Alcemyst01-Nov-2001 21:24 GMT
Comment 109Alcemyst01-Nov-2001 21:31 GMT
Comment 110Brecht [darklite]01-Nov-2001 21:53 GMT
Comment 111Alcemyst01-Nov-2001 22:11 GMT
Comment 112Anonymous01-Nov-2001 22:36 GMT
Comment 113Anonymous02-Nov-2001 00:52 GMT
Comment 114Graham02-Nov-2001 01:26 GMT
Comment 115TheArrogantSarny02-Nov-2001 04:14 GMT
Comment 116Menthos02-Nov-2001 06:28 GMT
Comment 117Harry Kok02-Nov-2001 09:46 GMT
Comment 118Bernd Meyer02-Nov-2001 10:32 GMT
Comment 119Bernd Meyer02-Nov-2001 11:07 GMT
Comment 120Bernd Meyer02-Nov-2001 11:30 GMT
Comment 121Ralph Schmidt02-Nov-2001 11:38 GMT
Comment 122Graham02-Nov-2001 12:05 GMT
Comment 123Bernd Meyer02-Nov-2001 12:12 GMT
Comment 124Ralph Schmidt02-Nov-2001 12:27 GMT
Comment 125Alcemyst02-Nov-2001 15:27 GMT
Comment 126Steffen Haeuser02-Nov-2001 17:44 GMT
Back to Top