29-Mar-2024 01:13 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Fleecy comments on outsourcing AmigaOSANN.lu
Posted on 06-Nov-2001 14:06 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä51 comments
View flat
View list
Read Fleecy's comments from the AmigaOne mailinglist below.

Yes Amiga is in control of OS4.0 - we have merely outsourced the project management. I am in daily contact with Hyperion and a feature document and deadlines and timescales are mulled over in minute detail.

As I explained at the show, this deal is more about freeing Amiga up to work on the SGA (Second Generation Amiga). AmigaOS4.0 was always more to do with getting a PPC based OS working on very specific PPC HW, and we were wasting a lot of time bouncing backwards and forwards. With the outsourcing agreement, the implementation has been moved much closer to the first piece of HW itself.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Dave06-Nov-2001 13:11 GMT
Comment 2Brecht [darklite]06-Nov-2001 13:23 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous06-Nov-2001 14:04 GMT
Comment 4Dave06-Nov-2001 14:08 GMT
Comment 5AlBolone06-Nov-2001 14:37 GMT
Comment 6gz06-Nov-2001 14:39 GMT
Comment 7Bertrand PRESLES06-Nov-2001 14:42 GMT
Comment 8Dave06-Nov-2001 15:03 GMT
Comment 9priest06-Nov-2001 15:13 GMT
Comment 10Martin Norman06-Nov-2001 15:31 GMT
Comment 11AlBolone06-Nov-2001 15:32 GMT
Comment 12Graham06-Nov-2001 16:30 GMT
Comment 13AlBolone06-Nov-2001 17:07 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous06-Nov-2001 17:18 GMT
Comment 15John Block06-Nov-2001 18:14 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous06-Nov-2001 18:49 GMT
Comment 17Paul Laycock06-Nov-2001 19:09 GMT
Comment 18AlBolone06-Nov-2001 19:57 GMT
Comment 19Smithy06-Nov-2001 21:39 GMT
Comment 20smithy06-Nov-2001 21:53 GMT
Comment 21smithy06-Nov-2001 21:59 GMT
Comment 22Keith_Blakemore-Noble06-Nov-2001 22:06 GMT
Comment 23Paul Laycock06-Nov-2001 22:45 GMT
Comment 24Paul Laycock06-Nov-2001 22:50 GMT
Comment 25Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 00:05 GMT
Comment 26gz07-Nov-2001 01:05 GMT
Comment 27Red Moose07-Nov-2001 01:37 GMT
Comment 28Soap Opera watcher07-Nov-2001 04:08 GMT
Comment 29cybereye07-Nov-2001 06:20 GMT
Comment 30Dave07-Nov-2001 07:18 GMT
Comment 31Dave07-Nov-2001 07:21 GMT
Comment 32AlBolone07-Nov-2001 07:53 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous07-Nov-2001 08:53 GMT
Comment 34smithy07-Nov-2001 10:04 GMT
Comment 35Andy Hall07-Nov-2001 10:06 GMT
Comment 36AlBolone07-Nov-2001 10:34 GMT
Comment 37Kochwurst07-Nov-2001 11:22 GMT
Comment 38Andy hall07-Nov-2001 12:18 GMT
Comment 39gz07-Nov-2001 12:46 GMT
Comment 40AlBolone07-Nov-2001 12:49 GMT
Comment 41gz07-Nov-2001 13:09 GMT
Comment 42Andy Hall07-Nov-2001 13:17 GMT
Comment 43gz07-Nov-2001 13:26 GMT
Comment 44Dave07-Nov-2001 13:51 GMT
Comment 45AlBolone07-Nov-2001 14:05 GMT
Comment 46Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 15:59 GMT
Fleecy comments on outsourcing AmigaOS : Comment 47 of 51ANN.lu
Posted by Andy Hall on 07-Nov-2001 16:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 45 (AlBolone):
Sorry it seemed as if you were placing the blame entirely on Amiga.
I think Amiga got tangled up by trying to please everyone all the time, when they don't have the resources to. When they became Amiga, they wanted to work on DE as the next generation stuff, and leave the Classic to the comunnity, but with all the crap going on with the PCI bus-boards wars and the CGX/P96/Mediator bollocks, I think they felt obliged to step in.
Whatever happen there is no excuse for either parties behaviour. The sad thing is that it isn't just the stupid minority this time it's the heads of the industry!!!!
The amiga is a wonderful machine - hence why after 9 hours of computers a day I spend more on my amiga when I get home.
As I said before I think that those of us that can be objective about the whole thing should just stand back and let them get on with it. There are far more important things in life.
Andy
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 48Allen Kong07-Nov-2001 20:50 GMT
Comment 49Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 20:54 GMT
Comment 50Dave08-Nov-2001 08:06 GMT
Comment 51Dave08-Nov-2001 08:38 GMT
Back to Top