23-Apr-2024 21:22 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Interview with Ben Hermans from HyperionANN.lu
Posted on 07-Nov-2001 20:45 GMT by Christophe Decanini194 comments
View flat
View list
Christoph Gutjahr interviewed Hyperion about AmigaOS 4.0. You can read the interview on amiga-news.de in English or in German.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini07-Nov-2001 19:47 GMT
Comment 2Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 20:20 GMT
Comment 3Christophe Decanini07-Nov-2001 20:33 GMT
Comment 4Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 20:52 GMT
Comment 5Kay Are Ulvestad07-Nov-2001 21:16 GMT
Comment 6Mekanix07-Nov-2001 21:17 GMT
Comment 7Janne07-Nov-2001 21:25 GMT
Comment 8Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 21:47 GMT
Comment 9smithy07-Nov-2001 21:47 GMT
Comment 10smithy07-Nov-2001 21:49 GMT
Comment 11Thomas Frieden07-Nov-2001 21:55 GMT
Comment 12Hans-Joerg Frieden07-Nov-2001 21:57 GMT
Comment 13Hans-Joerg Frieden07-Nov-2001 22:03 GMT
Comment 14Alan Watson07-Nov-2001 22:04 GMT
Comment 15Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 22:15 GMT
Comment 16David Scheibler07-Nov-2001 22:15 GMT
Comment 17Kay Are Ulvestad07-Nov-2001 22:18 GMT
Comment 18redrumloa07-Nov-2001 22:40 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous07-Nov-2001 22:44 GMT
Comment 20Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 22:47 GMT
Comment 21smithy07-Nov-2001 22:48 GMT
Comment 22Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 22:48 GMT
Comment 23Kay Are Ulvestad07-Nov-2001 22:52 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous07-Nov-2001 23:02 GMT
Comment 25Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 23:04 GMT
Comment 26tinman07-Nov-2001 23:08 GMT
Comment 27Mandrake07-Nov-2001 23:27 GMT
Comment 28NM07-Nov-2001 23:28 GMT
Comment 29Graham08-Nov-2001 00:19 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous08-Nov-2001 00:32 GMT
Comment 31Skal Loret08-Nov-2001 00:32 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous08-Nov-2001 00:38 GMT
Comment 33Ruben Monteiro08-Nov-2001 01:52 GMT
Comment 34EyeAm08-Nov-2001 04:41 GMT
Comment 35Harry Kok08-Nov-2001 05:35 GMT
Comment 36priest08-Nov-2001 05:45 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous08-Nov-2001 07:44 GMT
Comment 38adam Cheese08-Nov-2001 08:30 GMT
Comment 39Peter Gordon08-Nov-2001 08:32 GMT
Comment 40Brecht [darklite]08-Nov-2001 08:39 GMT
Comment 41Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Nov-2001 08:52 GMT
Comment 42Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Nov-2001 08:57 GMT
Comment 43Brecht [darklite]08-Nov-2001 09:06 GMT
Comment 44Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 09:12 GMT
Comment 45Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Nov-2001 09:30 GMT
Comment 46Ugr08-Nov-2001 09:36 GMT
Comment 47Teemu I. Yliselä08-Nov-2001 09:37 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous08-Nov-2001 09:43 GMT
Comment 49Graham08-Nov-2001 09:48 GMT
Comment 50Graham08-Nov-2001 10:07 GMT
Comment 51Peter Gordon08-Nov-2001 10:35 GMT
Comment 52Peter Gordon08-Nov-2001 10:37 GMT
Comment 53Graham08-Nov-2001 10:48 GMT
Comment 54wouter08-Nov-2001 10:55 GMT
Comment 55Graham08-Nov-2001 10:56 GMT
Comment 56Hans-Joerg Frieden08-Nov-2001 11:02 GMT
Comment 57Hans-Joerg Frieden08-Nov-2001 11:08 GMT
Comment 58Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Nov-2001 11:11 GMT
Comment 59Peter Gordon08-Nov-2001 11:21 GMT
Comment 60adam cheese08-Nov-2001 11:24 GMT
Comment 61Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 11:26 GMT
Comment 62adam cheese08-Nov-2001 11:27 GMT
Comment 63adam ceremuga08-Nov-2001 11:31 GMT
Comment 64dakang08-Nov-2001 11:52 GMT
Comment 65Graham08-Nov-2001 12:00 GMT
Comment 66Graham08-Nov-2001 12:08 GMT
Comment 67Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:09 GMT
Comment 68Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:17 GMT
Comment 69Ugr08-Nov-2001 12:25 GMT
Comment 70Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:27 GMT
Comment 71Brecht08-Nov-2001 12:28 GMT
Comment 72smithy08-Nov-2001 12:30 GMT
Comment 73windtalkers08-Nov-2001 12:35 GMT
Comment 74windtalkers08-Nov-2001 12:37 GMT
Comment 75Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:39 GMT
Comment 76Vidar Langberget08-Nov-2001 12:40 GMT
Comment 77Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:44 GMT
Comment 78Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 12:47 GMT
Comment 79smithy08-Nov-2001 12:47 GMT
Comment 80smithy08-Nov-2001 12:56 GMT
Comment 81smithy08-Nov-2001 12:59 GMT
Comment 82Graham08-Nov-2001 13:06 GMT
Comment 83adam08-Nov-2001 13:07 GMT
Comment 84Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 13:23 GMT
Comment 85Richie08-Nov-2001 13:32 GMT
Comment 86m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 13:32 GMT
Comment 87dark ness08-Nov-2001 13:50 GMT
Comment 88Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 13:55 GMT
Comment 89dark ness08-Nov-2001 14:00 GMT
Comment 90adam08-Nov-2001 14:02 GMT
Comment 91adam08-Nov-2001 14:05 GMT
Comment 92Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 14:11 GMT
Comment 93Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 14:11 GMT
Comment 94m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 14:15 GMT
Comment 95m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 14:17 GMT
Comment 96m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 14:20 GMT
Comment 97adam08-Nov-2001 14:29 GMT
Comment 98m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 14:39 GMT
Comment 99Brecht [darklite]08-Nov-2001 14:53 GMT
Comment 100Brecht08-Nov-2001 14:55 GMT
Comment 101Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 14:58 GMT
Comment 102adam08-Nov-2001 15:04 GMT
Comment 103Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:07 GMT
Comment 104Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:12 GMT
Comment 105Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 15:12 GMT
Comment 106Kay Are Ulvestad08-Nov-2001 15:15 GMT
Comment 107Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:15 GMT
Comment 108Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:19 GMT
Comment 109Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:21 GMT
Comment 110Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 15:22 GMT
Comment 111Anonymous08-Nov-2001 15:23 GMT
Comment 112Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 15:27 GMT
Interview with Ben Hermans from Hyperion : Comment 113 of 194ANN.lu
Posted by Mekanix on 08-Nov-2001 15:32 GMT
In reply to Comment 58 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
> The only problem is that x86 means
> Windows and Windows stiffles competition.
> Theoretically, an x86 box which cannot run
> Windows would do the trick but unfortunately
> that would be a custom product making the
> whole affaire "expensive" again.
Gnargh! How often are you going to repeat that nonsense? There is so much wrong with your reasoning that my head hurts and I really don't know where to begin.
Firstly you assume that when people have access to Windows they'd be lured to boot Windows over anything else. This assumtion is flawed on 2 counts. Reality check: most amigauser (if not all) *do* have a windows-box, so the "Windwosfactor" would apply for the current situation if not more. Wouldn't a running Windowssession (next to your Amiga) make you use Windows more often? While the hassle of dualbooting would make you less inclined to boot into Windows unless need be?
But all this really doesn't matter, because your Windowsassumption is just plain wrong. A huge amount of people are *not* running Windows on their x86 equipment, and I'm one of them.
Secondly I sence a strange notion of "failure" and using all kinds of "lessons" (Be, Loki etc.) wrongly. To me it almost sound as if you don't know the difference between marketshare (percentage) and installed userbase (absolute numbers). Focusing solely on the former while the latter is the only one that would make sence.
Looking at marketshare is easy to spell failures. BeOS' marketshare about 0% and Linux between 1-5%. That must be failures. But looking at installed userbase, BeOS possibly had something that's easily surpassed something AmigaOS haven't seen in a decade or something. Just look at the number of downloads not speaking of all those coverdisks on magazines.
And Linux, don't make me laugh. It's running in the millions, possible bigger than Amiga ever was. How you manage to get failure out of this is beyond me.
Now, look at the current path for AmigaOS 4.x. Your target is current installed userbase (don't expect any increase in that number) which runs in about 20-40.000 (how many copies did OS 3.9 sell? Less than 20k right?). Now, this number is dramatically reduced to that little fration who would shelve out a lot of doe on some expencive novelty HW and that little fraction you'll have to share with the MorphOS/Pegasos-team. That would optimistically mean a installed userbase between 5-15k for OS4, which is laughable compared BeOS (which you've labeled a failure).
But then again, OS 4 would have a marketshare of about 100% of AmigaOne equipment, and that's success, right? ;)
And 5-15k users? How difficult would that be to surpass for the x86/Amithlon-platform?
And from a pure businessperspective aren't you running the risk of loosing out to a renegade product (AROS/Amithlon)?
I really don't get this x86-angst.
>> Amiga on x86 is THE only way for survival.
> It certainly isn't. Cheap hardware is the
> way for survival regardless of the make of
> CPU and as long as it isn't a machine capable
> of running Windows.
> Hell, even that isn't true. Apple is doing
> fine and their hardware is quite expensive really.
Unless your name is Steve Jobs, running in novelty HW will not get you far. That's a lesson the Amiga-community learned a long time ago; if your locked to a singular platform your fucked!
Be (remember, that's who you keep refering to for learnt lessons) learned that with BeBox, hey even running on niche HW (Macs) will not get you far. Be shifted to x86 to late.
Hey, even Apple have been through a long rough ride almost loosing out.
And lastly I'd like to comment on some of the other stuff you've posted.
1) Trouble at Loki.
Well, duh. Loki have this really insane businessplan of porting month/year old games and releasing it at full prise to a community that long since have finished playing the value/budget release. Sounds familiar?
2) Trouble at Corel.
Yeah, duh! What do you expect? Corel was burning through millions a week and didn't really have anything to sell. No Corel-linux 1.0 wasn't release-materials; Suse, Mandrake, RH and others do it so much better. Hey, Corel-Linux couldn't even be installed on my machine.
3) Trouble at VA-Linux.
Are you really that surprised? VA-Linux are one of those dot-com businessmodels that relies on revenue comming from investors rather than selling products. Guess what happens when there are no more investors?
4) Failure of Linux.
How about a reality check? My guess is that it's the secondlargest desktopOS. Yeah, even larger than MacOS. And no, Linux isn't targeted at Joe User, yet. But it's getting there. As others have pointed out, have you had a look at KDE 2.2.1 recently? It gives me everything OS 3.9 haves to offer and so much more and so much better!
It isn't Windows you should fear, it's Linux. And there noveltyHW wont save you. Linux will get there!
5) Failures of BeOS.
Windows didn't kill BeOS. Be did! With their constant shift in focus (BeBox, Mac, x86, BeIA) everytime leaving user hanging. Lack of driver support. Giving away their primary source of income while betting on BeIA way way to soon.
Jump...
#127 priest #178 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 114priest08-Nov-2001 15:36 GMT
Comment 115Mekanix08-Nov-2001 15:38 GMT
Comment 116Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:45 GMT
Comment 117Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 15:49 GMT
Comment 118Mekanix08-Nov-2001 15:53 GMT
Comment 119Alan Watson08-Nov-2001 15:54 GMT
Comment 120Steve Brightman08-Nov-2001 16:04 GMT
Comment 121Kay Are Ulvestad08-Nov-2001 16:06 GMT
Comment 122Brecht08-Nov-2001 16:17 GMT
Comment 123Kay Are Ulvestad08-Nov-2001 16:24 GMT
Comment 124Brecht08-Nov-2001 16:29 GMT
Comment 125Vidar Langberget08-Nov-2001 16:30 GMT
Comment 126Brecht08-Nov-2001 16:31 GMT
Comment 127priest08-Nov-2001 16:37 GMT
Comment 128Brecht08-Nov-2001 16:37 GMT
Comment 129priest08-Nov-2001 16:57 GMT
Comment 130Brecht08-Nov-2001 17:04 GMT
Comment 131Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 17:27 GMT
Comment 132Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 17:37 GMT
Comment 133Brecht08-Nov-2001 17:51 GMT
Comment 134Ruben Monteiro08-Nov-2001 18:01 GMT
Comment 135Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 18:26 GMT
Comment 136Brecht08-Nov-2001 18:26 GMT
Comment 137Ruben Monteiro08-Nov-2001 18:33 GMT
Comment 138Michael Garlich08-Nov-2001 18:39 GMT
Comment 139Mekanix08-Nov-2001 18:40 GMT
Comment 140Brecht08-Nov-2001 18:40 GMT
Comment 141Ruben Monteiro08-Nov-2001 18:44 GMT
Comment 142Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 18:44 GMT
Comment 143redrumloa08-Nov-2001 18:59 GMT
Comment 144Brecht08-Nov-2001 19:08 GMT
Comment 145Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 19:08 GMT
Comment 146Casey R Williams08-Nov-2001 19:17 GMT
Comment 147Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 19:23 GMT
Comment 148Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 19:33 GMT
Comment 149Bring back Tim Rue all is forgiven!08-Nov-2001 19:46 GMT
Comment 150Mekanix08-Nov-2001 19:55 GMT
Comment 151smithy08-Nov-2001 20:06 GMT
Comment 152Mekanix08-Nov-2001 20:14 GMT
Comment 153Fabian Jimenez08-Nov-2001 20:14 GMT
Comment 154Mekanix08-Nov-2001 20:15 GMT
Comment 155Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 20:48 GMT
Comment 156Mr.Return08-Nov-2001 20:59 GMT
Comment 157Mekanix08-Nov-2001 21:05 GMT
Comment 158Kay Are Ulvestad08-Nov-2001 21:13 GMT
Comment 159Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 21:17 GMT
Comment 160Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 21:22 GMT
Comment 161smithy08-Nov-2001 21:54 GMT
Comment 162smithy08-Nov-2001 21:58 GMT
Comment 163Mekanix08-Nov-2001 21:58 GMT
Comment 164Mekanix08-Nov-2001 22:01 GMT
Comment 165smithy08-Nov-2001 22:07 GMT
Comment 166Alcemyst08-Nov-2001 22:21 GMT
Comment 167Alcemyst08-Nov-2001 22:30 GMT
Comment 168Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 22:32 GMT
Comment 169Alcemyst08-Nov-2001 22:55 GMT
Comment 170Alcemyst08-Nov-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 171Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 23:03 GMT
Comment 172Brecht08-Nov-2001 23:13 GMT
Comment 173Brecht08-Nov-2001 23:27 GMT
Comment 174Richie09-Nov-2001 00:11 GMT
Comment 175Brecht09-Nov-2001 00:20 GMT
Comment 176Richie09-Nov-2001 00:22 GMT
Comment 177EyeAm09-Nov-2001 01:28 GMT
Comment 178Anonymous09-Nov-2001 01:56 GMT
Comment 179Mekanix09-Nov-2001 06:25 GMT
Comment 180adam09-Nov-2001 06:28 GMT
Comment 181Kay Are Ulvestad09-Nov-2001 07:09 GMT
Comment 182Mekanix09-Nov-2001 07:18 GMT
Comment 183priest09-Nov-2001 08:42 GMT
Comment 184alt3reg009-Nov-2001 09:02 GMT
Comment 185José09-Nov-2001 12:31 GMT
Comment 186Richie09-Nov-2001 12:49 GMT
Comment 187José09-Nov-2001 14:45 GMT
Comment 188smithy09-Nov-2001 14:54 GMT
Comment 189Anonymous09-Nov-2001 15:36 GMT
Comment 190Bogus Realname09-Nov-2001 16:06 GMT
Comment 191Brecht [darklite]09-Nov-2001 16:51 GMT
Comment 192smithy09-Nov-2001 19:30 GMT
Comment 193Steve Brightman09-Nov-2001 20:23 GMT
Comment 194Anonymous10-Nov-2001 00:33 GMT
Back to Top