[News] Interview with Ben Hermans from Hyperion | ANN.lu |
Posted on 07-Nov-2001 20:45 GMT by Christophe Decanini | 194 comments View flat View list |
Christoph Gutjahr interviewed Hyperion about AmigaOS 4.0.
You can read the interview on amiga-news.de in English or in German.
|
|
List of all comments to this articleSorted by date, most recent at bottom |
Comment 1 | Christophe Decanini | | 07-Nov-2001 19:47 GMT |
Comment 2 | Brecht [darklite] | | 07-Nov-2001 20:20 GMT |
Comment 3 | Christophe Decanini | | 07-Nov-2001 20:33 GMT |
Comment 4 | Brecht [darklite] | | 07-Nov-2001 20:52 GMT |
Comment 5 | Kay Are Ulvestad | | 07-Nov-2001 21:16 GMT |
Comment 6 | Mekanix | | 07-Nov-2001 21:17 GMT |
Comment 7 | Janne | | 07-Nov-2001 21:25 GMT |
Comment 8 | Brecht [darklite] | | 07-Nov-2001 21:47 GMT |
Comment 9 | smithy | | 07-Nov-2001 21:47 GMT |
Comment 10 | smithy | | 07-Nov-2001 21:49 GMT |
Comment 11 | Thomas Frieden | | 07-Nov-2001 21:55 GMT |
Comment 12 | Hans-Joerg Frieden | | 07-Nov-2001 21:57 GMT |
Comment 13 | Hans-Joerg Frieden | | 07-Nov-2001 22:03 GMT |
Comment 14 | Alan Watson | | 07-Nov-2001 22:04 GMT |
|
Interview with Ben Hermans from Hyperion : Comment 15 of 194 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Brecht [darklite] on 07-Nov-2001 22:15 GMT | In reply to Comment 14 (Alan Watson): >OS4 will not be OS 3.9. It will not even be WarpOS (if you care to read the interview). Warp3D will be part of it, but only one part.
I didn't mention WarpOS.
What else will be new that's not in OS3.9?
>Again, I ask you to just stop talking about things you do not know.
Enlighten me.
>> BeOS example out of context
>That's funny. BeOS went bankrupt. What's the context there?
God, we must have explained this a few hundred times now... Go browse the ann archives.
>> Would Linux have been a success like it is without a x86 port? No.
>Since when is Linux a success? Most companies involved go bankrupt. VA Linux
>is doing different things now, Loki is insolvent, Corel sold out all Linux
>stuff. A number of users doesn't mean a number of customers.
Linux is a success in the professional world, but not on the desktop market (thank god, it sucks for desktop use).
>> Would QNX have been a success like it is without a x86 port? No.
>QNX? A success? LOL!
In the embedded market mostly.
>> Would half as many people be using Solaris if there was no x86 port.
>How many, then, actually use solaris? Hands up whoever used solaris here? I
>have, on SPARC's, but that doesn't count, does it?
professional world...
But all these OS's are/were far more successfull on the desktop market than a PPC AmigaOS will ever be.
>> Would half as many people still be using AmigaOS, and active members of the
>> community if it wasn't for UAE/x86 and Amithlon/x86? No.
>>
>> The truth, as ever, seems to be inconvenient.
>
>Yeah, especially if you bend the truth to your own liking like this. Come on,
>Amithlon is only out for a few days. Don't give me that crap. UAE? Sure, they
>are active members of the community... "Where can I find ROMS for Lemmings?" >You call that active... Bah!
You know better than to generalise than that.
BTW. Don't you have a deadline to make? ;p |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|