18-Apr-2024 22:32 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Interview with Ben Hermans from HyperionANN.lu
Posted on 07-Nov-2001 20:45 GMT by Christophe Decanini194 comments
View flat
View list
Christoph Gutjahr interviewed Hyperion about AmigaOS 4.0. You can read the interview on amiga-news.de in English or in German.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini07-Nov-2001 19:47 GMT
Comment 2Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 20:20 GMT
Comment 3Christophe Decanini07-Nov-2001 20:33 GMT
Comment 4Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 20:52 GMT
Comment 5Kay Are Ulvestad07-Nov-2001 21:16 GMT
Comment 6Mekanix07-Nov-2001 21:17 GMT
Comment 7Janne07-Nov-2001 21:25 GMT
Comment 8Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 21:47 GMT
Comment 9smithy07-Nov-2001 21:47 GMT
Comment 10smithy07-Nov-2001 21:49 GMT
Comment 11Thomas Frieden07-Nov-2001 21:55 GMT
Comment 12Hans-Joerg Frieden07-Nov-2001 21:57 GMT
Comment 13Hans-Joerg Frieden07-Nov-2001 22:03 GMT
Comment 14Alan Watson07-Nov-2001 22:04 GMT
Comment 15Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 22:15 GMT
Comment 16David Scheibler07-Nov-2001 22:15 GMT
Comment 17Kay Are Ulvestad07-Nov-2001 22:18 GMT
Comment 18redrumloa07-Nov-2001 22:40 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous07-Nov-2001 22:44 GMT
Comment 20Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 22:47 GMT
Comment 21smithy07-Nov-2001 22:48 GMT
Comment 22Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 22:48 GMT
Comment 23Kay Are Ulvestad07-Nov-2001 22:52 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous07-Nov-2001 23:02 GMT
Comment 25Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 23:04 GMT
Comment 26tinman07-Nov-2001 23:08 GMT
Comment 27Mandrake07-Nov-2001 23:27 GMT
Comment 28NM07-Nov-2001 23:28 GMT
Comment 29Graham08-Nov-2001 00:19 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous08-Nov-2001 00:32 GMT
Comment 31Skal Loret08-Nov-2001 00:32 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous08-Nov-2001 00:38 GMT
Comment 33Ruben Monteiro08-Nov-2001 01:52 GMT
Comment 34EyeAm08-Nov-2001 04:41 GMT
Comment 35Harry Kok08-Nov-2001 05:35 GMT
Comment 36priest08-Nov-2001 05:45 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous08-Nov-2001 07:44 GMT
Comment 38adam Cheese08-Nov-2001 08:30 GMT
Comment 39Peter Gordon08-Nov-2001 08:32 GMT
Comment 40Brecht [darklite]08-Nov-2001 08:39 GMT
Comment 41Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Nov-2001 08:52 GMT
Comment 42Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Nov-2001 08:57 GMT
Comment 43Brecht [darklite]08-Nov-2001 09:06 GMT
Comment 44Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 09:12 GMT
Comment 45Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Nov-2001 09:30 GMT
Comment 46Ugr08-Nov-2001 09:36 GMT
Comment 47Teemu I. Yliselä08-Nov-2001 09:37 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous08-Nov-2001 09:43 GMT
Comment 49Graham08-Nov-2001 09:48 GMT
Comment 50Graham08-Nov-2001 10:07 GMT
Comment 51Peter Gordon08-Nov-2001 10:35 GMT
Comment 52Peter Gordon08-Nov-2001 10:37 GMT
Comment 53Graham08-Nov-2001 10:48 GMT
Comment 54wouter08-Nov-2001 10:55 GMT
Comment 55Graham08-Nov-2001 10:56 GMT
Comment 56Hans-Joerg Frieden08-Nov-2001 11:02 GMT
Comment 57Hans-Joerg Frieden08-Nov-2001 11:08 GMT
Comment 58Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Nov-2001 11:11 GMT
Comment 59Peter Gordon08-Nov-2001 11:21 GMT
Comment 60adam cheese08-Nov-2001 11:24 GMT
Comment 61Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 11:26 GMT
Comment 62adam cheese08-Nov-2001 11:27 GMT
Comment 63adam ceremuga08-Nov-2001 11:31 GMT
Comment 64dakang08-Nov-2001 11:52 GMT
Comment 65Graham08-Nov-2001 12:00 GMT
Comment 66Graham08-Nov-2001 12:08 GMT
Comment 67Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:09 GMT
Comment 68Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:17 GMT
Comment 69Ugr08-Nov-2001 12:25 GMT
Comment 70Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:27 GMT
Comment 71Brecht08-Nov-2001 12:28 GMT
Comment 72smithy08-Nov-2001 12:30 GMT
Comment 73windtalkers08-Nov-2001 12:35 GMT
Comment 74windtalkers08-Nov-2001 12:37 GMT
Comment 75Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:39 GMT
Comment 76Vidar Langberget08-Nov-2001 12:40 GMT
Comment 77Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 12:44 GMT
Comment 78Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 12:47 GMT
Comment 79smithy08-Nov-2001 12:47 GMT
Comment 80smithy08-Nov-2001 12:56 GMT
Comment 81smithy08-Nov-2001 12:59 GMT
Comment 82Graham08-Nov-2001 13:06 GMT
Comment 83adam08-Nov-2001 13:07 GMT
Comment 84Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 13:23 GMT
Comment 85Richie08-Nov-2001 13:32 GMT
Comment 86m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 13:32 GMT
Comment 87dark ness08-Nov-2001 13:50 GMT
Comment 88Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 13:55 GMT
Comment 89dark ness08-Nov-2001 14:00 GMT
Comment 90adam08-Nov-2001 14:02 GMT
Comment 91adam08-Nov-2001 14:05 GMT
Comment 92Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 14:11 GMT
Comment 93Fabio Alemagna08-Nov-2001 14:11 GMT
Comment 94m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 14:15 GMT
Comment 95m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 14:17 GMT
Comment 96m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 14:20 GMT
Comment 97adam08-Nov-2001 14:29 GMT
Comment 98m0ns00n08-Nov-2001 14:39 GMT
Comment 99Brecht [darklite]08-Nov-2001 14:53 GMT
Comment 100Brecht08-Nov-2001 14:55 GMT
Comment 101Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 14:58 GMT
Comment 102adam08-Nov-2001 15:04 GMT
Comment 103Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:07 GMT
Comment 104Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:12 GMT
Comment 105Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 15:12 GMT
Comment 106Kay Are Ulvestad08-Nov-2001 15:15 GMT
Comment 107Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:15 GMT
Comment 108Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:19 GMT
Comment 109Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:21 GMT
Comment 110Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 15:22 GMT
Comment 111Anonymous08-Nov-2001 15:23 GMT
Comment 112Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 15:27 GMT
Comment 113Mekanix08-Nov-2001 15:32 GMT
Comment 114priest08-Nov-2001 15:36 GMT
Comment 115Mekanix08-Nov-2001 15:38 GMT
Comment 116Brecht08-Nov-2001 15:45 GMT
Comment 117Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 15:49 GMT
Comment 118Mekanix08-Nov-2001 15:53 GMT
Comment 119Alan Watson08-Nov-2001 15:54 GMT
Comment 120Steve Brightman08-Nov-2001 16:04 GMT
Comment 121Kay Are Ulvestad08-Nov-2001 16:06 GMT
Comment 122Brecht08-Nov-2001 16:17 GMT
Comment 123Kay Are Ulvestad08-Nov-2001 16:24 GMT
Comment 124Brecht08-Nov-2001 16:29 GMT
Comment 125Vidar Langberget08-Nov-2001 16:30 GMT
Comment 126Brecht08-Nov-2001 16:31 GMT
Comment 127priest08-Nov-2001 16:37 GMT
Comment 128Brecht08-Nov-2001 16:37 GMT
Comment 129priest08-Nov-2001 16:57 GMT
Comment 130Brecht08-Nov-2001 17:04 GMT
Comment 131Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 17:27 GMT
Comment 132Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 17:37 GMT
Comment 133Brecht08-Nov-2001 17:51 GMT
Comment 134Ruben Monteiro08-Nov-2001 18:01 GMT
Comment 135Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 18:26 GMT
Comment 136Brecht08-Nov-2001 18:26 GMT
Comment 137Ruben Monteiro08-Nov-2001 18:33 GMT
Comment 138Michael Garlich08-Nov-2001 18:39 GMT
Comment 139Mekanix08-Nov-2001 18:40 GMT
Comment 140Brecht08-Nov-2001 18:40 GMT
Comment 141Ruben Monteiro08-Nov-2001 18:44 GMT
Comment 142Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 18:44 GMT
Comment 143redrumloa08-Nov-2001 18:59 GMT
Comment 144Brecht08-Nov-2001 19:08 GMT
Comment 145Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 19:08 GMT
Comment 146Casey R Williams08-Nov-2001 19:17 GMT
Comment 147Christophe Decanini08-Nov-2001 19:23 GMT
Comment 148Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 19:33 GMT
Comment 149Bring back Tim Rue all is forgiven!08-Nov-2001 19:46 GMT
Comment 150Mekanix08-Nov-2001 19:55 GMT
Comment 151smithy08-Nov-2001 20:06 GMT
Comment 152Mekanix08-Nov-2001 20:14 GMT
Comment 153Fabian Jimenez08-Nov-2001 20:14 GMT
Comment 154Mekanix08-Nov-2001 20:15 GMT
Comment 155Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 20:48 GMT
Comment 156Mr.Return08-Nov-2001 20:59 GMT
Comment 157Mekanix08-Nov-2001 21:05 GMT
Comment 158Kay Are Ulvestad08-Nov-2001 21:13 GMT
Comment 159Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 21:17 GMT
Comment 160Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 21:22 GMT
Comment 161smithy08-Nov-2001 21:54 GMT
Comment 162smithy08-Nov-2001 21:58 GMT
Comment 163Mekanix08-Nov-2001 21:58 GMT
Comment 164Mekanix08-Nov-2001 22:01 GMT
Comment 165smithy08-Nov-2001 22:07 GMT
Comment 166Alcemyst08-Nov-2001 22:21 GMT
Comment 167Alcemyst08-Nov-2001 22:30 GMT
Comment 168Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 22:32 GMT
Comment 169Alcemyst08-Nov-2001 22:55 GMT
Comment 170Alcemyst08-Nov-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 171Bill Hoggett08-Nov-2001 23:03 GMT
Comment 172Brecht08-Nov-2001 23:13 GMT
Comment 173Brecht08-Nov-2001 23:27 GMT
Comment 174Richie09-Nov-2001 00:11 GMT
Comment 175Brecht09-Nov-2001 00:20 GMT
Comment 176Richie09-Nov-2001 00:22 GMT
Comment 177EyeAm09-Nov-2001 01:28 GMT
Comment 178Anonymous09-Nov-2001 01:56 GMT
Comment 179Mekanix09-Nov-2001 06:25 GMT
Comment 180adam09-Nov-2001 06:28 GMT
Comment 181Kay Are Ulvestad09-Nov-2001 07:09 GMT
Comment 182Mekanix09-Nov-2001 07:18 GMT
Comment 183priest09-Nov-2001 08:42 GMT
Comment 184alt3reg009-Nov-2001 09:02 GMT
Comment 185José09-Nov-2001 12:31 GMT
Comment 186Richie09-Nov-2001 12:49 GMT
Interview with Ben Hermans from Hyperion : Comment 187 of 194ANN.lu
Posted by José on 09-Nov-2001 14:45 GMT
In reply to Comment 186 (Richie):
Well, I think you have no base to justify those coments. Those companies actually worket together to develop PPC. There is no monopoly in PPC as far as I know. Please stop nonsense coments to satisfy your obcessions.
Actually SGI droped their processors and are willing to use future PPCs (G5). I don't remember well if this is a rumour but I think it wasn't. PPC also has a play in the embedded market. ....etc.
I think the conclusion to be made is that there is a risk. A risk that is not worth taking, at least now. MANY of the arguments that are used in favour of x86 could be used against it, and vice versa for PPC. But has there ever been any company that was able to penetrate the x86 OS market??! Isnt' that fisical prof that the risk is hight?! So what x86 gives us more users. x86 users won't buy Amiga software, simply because Windows software is in general more developed and featured (and more slow and buggy as you know). Also even if there is Amiga sofware that would be better, the marketting power Windows has doesn't give Amiga a chance. Hasn't there been enouph evidence that it's not the best solution that wins !?. Now you ask, in what does PPC changes this?. Well, I think there are still ancient users that would come to the platform. It's nonsense, because they'd have their chosen software in x86 hardware I know. But that's just how it is. And would these users buy Amiga software if to their x86 machine? NO! Sorry, but I don't think all this is based on just logic.
But it has it's logic. Many just sympathise with the Amiga. I would be happy to have my Amiga machine, with it's own hardware. Also some users just like something different. There are always people that would buy it, even it just for the hardware (G5 will kick ass given the tests).
Just my support for the non x86 theory.
Cheers
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 188smithy09-Nov-2001 14:54 GMT
Comment 189Anonymous09-Nov-2001 15:36 GMT
Comment 190Bogus Realname09-Nov-2001 16:06 GMT
Comment 191Brecht [darklite]09-Nov-2001 16:51 GMT
Comment 192smithy09-Nov-2001 19:30 GMT
Comment 193Steve Brightman09-Nov-2001 20:23 GMT
Comment 194Anonymous10-Nov-2001 00:33 GMT
Back to Top