23-Apr-2024 09:41 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Cloanto critisize AmigaXL marketingANN.lu
Posted on 29-Nov-2001 01:16 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä82 comments
View flat
View list
Cloanto stated their opinion about AmigaXL marketing, which they feel has been misleading. They also released a comparison of Amiga Forever and "other solutions".
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous29-Nov-2001 01:35 GMT
Comment 2FCAC29-Nov-2001 02:06 GMT
Comment 3adam ceremuga29-Nov-2001 02:38 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous29-Nov-2001 02:53 GMT
Comment 5Kolbjørn Barmen29-Nov-2001 03:31 GMT
Comment 6Zooba29-Nov-2001 04:09 GMT
Comment 7redrumloa29-Nov-2001 04:12 GMT
Comment 8Mike Veroukis29-Nov-2001 05:02 GMT
Comment 9Solar (BAUD)29-Nov-2001 05:51 GMT
Comment 10Lennart Fridén29-Nov-2001 06:00 GMT
Comment 11Desmon29-Nov-2001 06:06 GMT
Comment 12Jürgen Schober29-Nov-2001 07:06 GMT
Comment 13Sotiris Papageorgioy29-Nov-2001 07:55 GMT
Comment 14Peter Gordon29-Nov-2001 08:41 GMT
Comment 15Don Cox29-Nov-2001 08:52 GMT
Comment 16Bill Hoggett29-Nov-2001 08:55 GMT
Comment 17Peter Gordon29-Nov-2001 10:03 GMT
Comment 18Fabio Alemagna29-Nov-2001 10:23 GMT
Comment 19Georg Steger29-Nov-2001 11:54 GMT
Comment 20Fabio Alemagna29-Nov-2001 12:01 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous29-Nov-2001 12:03 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous29-Nov-2001 12:05 GMT
Comment 23Desmon29-Nov-2001 12:17 GMT
Comment 24Fabio Alemagna29-Nov-2001 12:18 GMT
Comment 25Fabio Alemagna29-Nov-2001 12:20 GMT
Comment 26Desmon29-Nov-2001 12:22 GMT
Comment 27Fabio Alemagna29-Nov-2001 12:25 GMT
Comment 28Desmon29-Nov-2001 12:26 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous29-Nov-2001 12:59 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous29-Nov-2001 13:27 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous29-Nov-2001 13:39 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous29-Nov-2001 13:48 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous29-Nov-2001 13:54 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous29-Nov-2001 13:59 GMT
Comment 35Graham29-Nov-2001 14:53 GMT
Comment 36JW29-Nov-2001 15:04 GMT
Comment 37Bladerunner29-Nov-2001 15:06 GMT
Comment 38JW29-Nov-2001 15:21 GMT
Comment 39Peter Gordon29-Nov-2001 15:38 GMT
Comment 40Graham29-Nov-2001 16:16 GMT
Comment 41tinman29-Nov-2001 16:29 GMT
Comment 42Graham29-Nov-2001 16:45 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous29-Nov-2001 17:05 GMT
Comment 44Brecht [darklite]29-Nov-2001 17:19 GMT
Comment 45tinman29-Nov-2001 17:21 GMT
Comment 46Afroman29-Nov-2001 17:24 GMT
Comment 47Ruben Monteiro29-Nov-2001 17:30 GMT
Comment 48Graham29-Nov-2001 17:37 GMT
Comment 49Brecht [darklite]29-Nov-2001 18:52 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous29-Nov-2001 20:13 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous29-Nov-2001 20:15 GMT
Comment 52ShAwn29-Nov-2001 20:16 GMT
Comment 53Graham29-Nov-2001 21:19 GMT
Comment 54Anonymous29-Nov-2001 21:59 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous29-Nov-2001 22:02 GMT
Comment 56Keith_Blakemore-Noble29-Nov-2001 23:43 GMT
Comment 57Donovan Reeve30-Nov-2001 01:03 GMT
Comment 58tinman30-Nov-2001 02:37 GMT
Comment 59Douglas McLaughlin30-Nov-2001 04:23 GMT
Comment 60Kolbjørn Barmen30-Nov-2001 04:55 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous30-Nov-2001 05:21 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous30-Nov-2001 05:24 GMT
Comment 63Anonymous30-Nov-2001 05:30 GMT
Comment 64Solar (BAUD)30-Nov-2001 06:45 GMT
Comment 65Solar (BAUD)30-Nov-2001 06:46 GMT
Comment 66Brecht [darklite]30-Nov-2001 08:06 GMT
Comment 67Peter Gordon30-Nov-2001 10:38 GMT
Comment 68Graham30-Nov-2001 12:26 GMT
Comment 69Graham30-Nov-2001 12:30 GMT
Comment 70Peter Gordon30-Nov-2001 14:52 GMT
Comment 71Ville Sarell30-Nov-2001 17:09 GMT
Comment 72Ville Sarell30-Nov-2001 17:13 GMT
Comment 73victor #30-Nov-2001 18:52 GMT
Comment 74Anonymous30-Nov-2001 21:10 GMT
Comment 75victor #30-Nov-2001 21:11 GMT
Comment 76Keith_Blakemore-Noble30-Nov-2001 21:39 GMT
Comment 77Donovan Reeve01-Dec-2001 01:46 GMT
Comment 78Donovan Reeve01-Dec-2001 02:01 GMT
Comment 79victor #01-Dec-2001 03:42 GMT
Comment 80Bernd Meyer02-Dec-2001 14:27 GMT
Comment 81Solar (BAUD)03-Dec-2001 13:21 GMT
Cloanto critisize AmigaXL marketing : Comment 82 of 82ANN.lu
Posted by victor # on 04-Dec-2001 00:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 81 (Solar (BAUD)):
I'm not deeply in the PC/x86 fields. I heard there is some issue also about CPU modes (normal, protected, etc.), also in contact with memory. And AFAIK, some "extended memory manager" still have to run in the background, at least in the Win9x, Me series, that manages memory-access above 1MB.
> Sorry, but even if we would very much like it otherwise, the Win9x
> multitasking *is* preemptive. (The fact that it´s so horribly done is
> because they didn´t redesign the GUI messaging from scratch, dragging
> a lot of Win3.11 legacy with them.)
Uhhmm! Really? How... lamers they are! This was a sin!
Anyway, something certainly causes that many times the system behaves like if some routine (other than the GUI, or even other that the OS) has been lost in some inside loop, for a while. Like few msec to even several seconds, or more, freezing the whole system in between. So, it feels like if it were cooperative. Or, we could say, it is partly so...
Anyway, there were paging sometime, and that not at all were favourable to fast task scheduling methods, and everything based on that. I wouldn't surprised at all if some(?) code segments were dragged even into the XP, like, as you said, into the 9x series...
So, AmigaOS could easily run better on today's PC's that even the XP... :)
Jump...
TopPrevious commentbottom
Back to Top