04-Dec-2024 09:06 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Motd] MOTD 02/01/2002ANN.lu
Posted on 02-Jan-2002 22:39 GMT by Christian Kemp174 comments
View flat
View list
Today, I tracked over one hundred attempts of abuse on ANN. I've been working on the filters and editing mechanisms for over four hours. Maintaining ANN is turning into real work, and all I see are tasks that I despise. This one individual, and the general attitude on ANN lately, is alienating visitors and making this site a horrible place to be. Most of what I see is insults and blind advocacy... I'm tired... And I can just see the negative comments again, in reply to me posting this...
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1[JC]02-Jan-2002 21:58 GMT
Comment 2Mikey C02-Jan-2002 22:11 GMT
Comment 3Daniel Miller02-Jan-2002 22:19 GMT
Comment 4Frank21302-Jan-2002 22:39 GMT
Comment 5Thomas Würgler / Pagan Games02-Jan-2002 22:42 GMT
Comment 6bbrockie02-Jan-2002 22:42 GMT
Comment 7Amigo02-Jan-2002 22:55 GMT
Comment 8Graham02-Jan-2002 23:01 GMT
Comment 9Graham02-Jan-2002 23:04 GMT
Comment 10Smithy02-Jan-2002 23:07 GMT
Comment 11Amigo02-Jan-2002 23:11 GMT
Comment 12smithy02-Jan-2002 23:20 GMT
Comment 13Robb Perrone02-Jan-2002 23:32 GMT
Comment 14The Party is Over...02-Jan-2002 23:37 GMT
Comment 15Antoine Dubourg02-Jan-2002 23:38 GMT
Comment 16Ken Moyer02-Jan-2002 23:39 GMT
Comment 17Skal Loret02-Jan-2002 23:50 GMT
Comment 18Mike Veroukis02-Jan-2002 23:56 GMT
Comment 19Graham03-Jan-2002 00:03 GMT
Comment 20redrumloa03-Jan-2002 00:06 GMT
Comment 21Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 00:06 GMT
Comment 22Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 00:14 GMT
Comment 23redrumloa03-Jan-2002 00:26 GMT
Comment 24Hagge03-Jan-2002 00:46 GMT
Comment 25[JC]03-Jan-2002 00:52 GMT
Comment 26Graham03-Jan-2002 01:15 GMT
Comment 27Rodney McDonell03-Jan-2002 01:17 GMT
Comment 28Greg Hayes03-Jan-2002 01:27 GMT
Comment 29teotwin03-Jan-2002 01:55 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous03-Jan-2002 02:51 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous03-Jan-2002 02:55 GMT
Comment 32sdfhsdiuh03-Jan-2002 03:03 GMT
Comment 33sdfhsdiuh03-Jan-2002 03:07 GMT
Comment 34Joe "Floid" Kanowitz03-Jan-2002 03:20 GMT
Comment 35[JC]03-Jan-2002 03:38 GMT
Comment 36[JC]03-Jan-2002 03:42 GMT
Comment 37Graham03-Jan-2002 03:44 GMT
Comment 38erm03-Jan-2002 03:45 GMT
Comment 39grrrrr03-Jan-2002 03:49 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous03-Jan-2002 03:59 GMT
Comment 41Gil Knutson03-Jan-2002 04:01 GMT
Comment 42[JC]03-Jan-2002 04:03 GMT
Comment 43Mike03-Jan-2002 04:06 GMT
Comment 44Mike03-Jan-2002 04:08 GMT
Comment 45Gil Knutson03-Jan-2002 04:08 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous03-Jan-2002 04:12 GMT
Comment 47Gil Knutson03-Jan-2002 04:13 GMT
Comment 48Mike03-Jan-2002 04:18 GMT
Comment 49Mike03-Jan-2002 04:23 GMT
Comment 50Steve03-Jan-2002 04:28 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous03-Jan-2002 04:33 GMT
Comment 52Anonymous03-Jan-2002 04:37 GMT
Comment 53John Paul Copeland03-Jan-2002 04:45 GMT
Comment 54Amigo03-Jan-2002 04:53 GMT
Comment 55simoami03-Jan-2002 05:25 GMT
Comment 56[JC]03-Jan-2002 05:34 GMT
Comment 57[JC]03-Jan-2002 05:36 GMT
Comment 58Alkis Tsapanidis03-Jan-2002 05:38 GMT
Comment 59Treke03-Jan-2002 05:38 GMT
Comment 60Rafo03-Jan-2002 05:44 GMT
Comment 61Mekanix03-Jan-2002 05:50 GMT
Comment 62Mekanix03-Jan-2002 05:53 GMT
Comment 63Mekanix03-Jan-2002 05:59 GMT
Comment 64Steve03-Jan-2002 06:06 GMT
Comment 65[JC]03-Jan-2002 06:09 GMT
Comment 66[JC]03-Jan-2002 06:09 GMT
Comment 67[JC]03-Jan-2002 06:09 GMT
Comment 68[JC]03-Jan-2002 06:11 GMT
Comment 69[JC]03-Jan-2002 06:12 GMT
Comment 70Firebird^03-Jan-2002 06:47 GMT
Comment 71Firebird^03-Jan-2002 06:51 GMT
Comment 72Ben Yoris03-Jan-2002 06:57 GMT
Comment 73Mika Hanhijärvi03-Jan-2002 07:12 GMT
Comment 74Mika Hanhijärvi03-Jan-2002 07:17 GMT
Comment 75DC03-Jan-2002 07:23 GMT
Comment 76Holo-Holo03-Jan-2002 07:44 GMT
Comment 77AmiFreak03-Jan-2002 08:16 GMT
Comment 78StormB03-Jan-2002 08:39 GMT
Comment 79Samface03-Jan-2002 09:14 GMT
Comment 80Christian Kemp03-Jan-2002 09:17 GMT
Comment 81smithy03-Jan-2002 09:59 GMT
Comment 82Dave03-Jan-2002 10:11 GMT
Comment 83Frank21303-Jan-2002 10:16 GMT
Comment 84Anonymous03-Jan-2002 10:26 GMT
Comment 85Anonymous03-Jan-2002 10:27 GMT
Comment 86José03-Jan-2002 10:27 GMT
Comment 87Samface03-Jan-2002 10:49 GMT
Comment 88Dave03-Jan-2002 11:02 GMT
Comment 89Samface03-Jan-2002 11:05 GMT
Comment 90RudyG03-Jan-2002 11:16 GMT
Comment 91RudyG03-Jan-2002 11:32 GMT
Comment 92RudyG03-Jan-2002 11:42 GMT
Comment 93Joe "Floid" Kanowitz03-Jan-2002 12:06 GMT
Comment 94Tony Barton03-Jan-2002 12:20 GMT
Comment 95Tony Barton03-Jan-2002 12:20 GMT
Comment 96Dave03-Jan-2002 12:43 GMT
Comment 97Lennart Fridén03-Jan-2002 12:48 GMT
Comment 98Joe "Floid" Kanowitz03-Jan-2002 12:50 GMT
Comment 99Him that DOESNT03-Jan-2002 12:51 GMT
Comment 100Dave03-Jan-2002 13:01 GMT
Comment 101William F. Maddock03-Jan-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 102Dave03-Jan-2002 13:33 GMT
Comment 103Andy Mills03-Jan-2002 13:44 GMT
Comment 104Henrik03-Jan-2002 14:12 GMT
Comment 105Dave03-Jan-2002 14:19 GMT
Comment 106Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 14:24 GMT
Comment 107THE Believer03-Jan-2002 14:27 GMT
Comment 108Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 14:34 GMT
Comment 109Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 14:38 GMT
Comment 110Very important...03-Jan-2002 14:45 GMT
Comment 111Samface03-Jan-2002 14:46 GMT
Comment 112Dave03-Jan-2002 14:50 GMT
Comment 113Re: very important03-Jan-2002 14:54 GMT
Comment 114Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 14:57 GMT
Comment 115Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 15:06 GMT
Comment 116Anonymous03-Jan-2002 15:09 GMT
Comment 117smithy03-Jan-2002 15:20 GMT
Comment 118Mekanix03-Jan-2002 15:21 GMT
Comment 119Dave03-Jan-2002 15:24 GMT
Comment 120Dave03-Jan-2002 15:28 GMT
Comment 121Mekanix03-Jan-2002 15:30 GMT
Comment 122Don Cox03-Jan-2002 16:16 GMT
Comment 123Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 16:19 GMT
MOTD 02/01/2002 : Comment 124 of 174ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 03-Jan-2002 16:27 GMT
In reply to Comment 117 (smithy):
>As for the calendar system, I don't think anybody started keeping time until
>the year 500. And rather interestingly, by our modern calendar system, King
>Herod (from the Christmas story) wasn't born until the year 30AD!
>All I am saying is that the modern calendar system can only be moderately
>accuracte for 1500 years at the most, before that they didn't even have
>timekeeping devices, Issac Newton (1500ish) used his own heartbeat when he
>discovered the laws of motion!
Dude, I don't know what kind of drugs you are on or where you are getting your
information, but people have been keeping time as best as anyone knows for
5000 to 6000 years! The ancient Chinese had incense clocks where the incence
would burn weighted strings at a specific interval, the ancients had sundials
and many other types of timekeeping devices including water clocks, etc. All
these were very common in ancient times.
Perhaps you should lay off the dope, stop spouting your foolish nonsense
and visit this link: http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/Time/early.html
Here you find that people have been keeping time for thousands of years,
contrary to the utter nonsense that you have posted here. If you got this information
from another human, and it isn't something that came to you in a drug induced
stupor, you should kick the living shit out of them! :0 Everything you have
posted here and I mean everything is utter nonsense and an embarrasment!
All I'm saying is get a grip before you hurt yourself!!!
Jump...
#128 William F. Maddock #137 syzygy
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 125Ben03-Jan-2002 16:33 GMT
Comment 126William F. Maddock03-Jan-2002 17:06 GMT
Comment 127William F. Maddock03-Jan-2002 17:09 GMT
Comment 128William F. Maddock03-Jan-2002 17:20 GMT
Comment 129priest03-Jan-2002 17:21 GMT
Comment 130John Roberts03-Jan-2002 17:40 GMT
Comment 131Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 17:44 GMT
Comment 132Chris Perver03-Jan-2002 18:32 GMT
Comment 133Sven Harvey03-Jan-2002 20:36 GMT
Comment 134redrumloa03-Jan-2002 21:44 GMT
Comment 135Smithy03-Jan-2002 21:50 GMT
Comment 136Mike Veroukis03-Jan-2002 21:59 GMT
Comment 137syzygy03-Jan-2002 22:20 GMT
Comment 138Firebird^04-Jan-2002 06:41 GMT
Comment 139Dave04-Jan-2002 07:50 GMT
Comment 140Dave04-Jan-2002 08:08 GMT
Comment 141Dave04-Jan-2002 08:29 GMT
Comment 142Dave04-Jan-2002 08:33 GMT
Comment 143Amigo04-Jan-2002 09:00 GMT
Comment 144smithy04-Jan-2002 09:08 GMT
Comment 145Dave04-Jan-2002 09:23 GMT
Comment 146Dave04-Jan-2002 09:27 GMT
Comment 147Amigo04-Jan-2002 11:04 GMT
Comment 148THE Believer04-Jan-2002 13:01 GMT
Comment 149William F. Maddock04-Jan-2002 13:15 GMT
Comment 150William F. Maddock04-Jan-2002 13:25 GMT
Comment 151Dave04-Jan-2002 14:25 GMT
Comment 152Denis Troller04-Jan-2002 14:43 GMT
Comment 153William F. Maddock04-Jan-2002 15:33 GMT
Comment 154Mike Veroukis04-Jan-2002 16:08 GMT
Comment 155Dave04-Jan-2002 16:23 GMT
Comment 156Lennart Fridén04-Jan-2002 16:41 GMT
Comment 157BouncingAyatollah04-Jan-2002 17:41 GMT
Comment 158Amigo04-Jan-2002 18:25 GMT
Comment 159Mike Veroukis04-Jan-2002 19:04 GMT
Comment 160Dave04-Jan-2002 19:09 GMT
Comment 161Dave04-Jan-2002 19:11 GMT
Comment 162victor #04-Jan-2002 19:38 GMT
Comment 163William F. Maddock04-Jan-2002 20:04 GMT
Comment 164Ugo Paliotto04-Jan-2002 21:56 GMT
Comment 165Drew05-Jan-2002 04:47 GMT
Comment 166Juan J. Garza05-Jan-2002 05:51 GMT
Comment 167Amiga 200105-Jan-2002 06:22 GMT
Comment 168Amiga 200105-Jan-2002 06:27 GMT
Comment 169Lennart Fridén05-Jan-2002 10:40 GMT
Comment 170Emmanuel Lesueur05-Jan-2002 13:03 GMT
Comment 171Amigaman of Lake Station, In. USA05-Jan-2002 13:31 GMT
Comment 172smithy05-Jan-2002 21:02 GMT
Comment 173[JC]05-Jan-2002 21:09 GMT
Comment 174Sammy Nordström06-Jan-2002 14:08 GMT
Back to Top