[News] Details on ATI Radeon support in OS4 | ANN.lu |
Posted on 16-Jan-2002 16:48 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä | 61 comments View flat View list |
Bill Toner talked about issues regarding the support of ATI Radeon chipsets in AmigaOS4 on the AmigaOne mailing list. Read the message below.
ATI Radeon support will happen, but I'm not sure when it will be completed. Permedia 3 support has been announced as well. This will initially support the original Radeon chipset, RV100 that has been around a while, and will at some point support the newer Radeon chip, the RV200 as well. My business partner and I are the "other party" Hyperion mentioned in their OS4/Radeon/Permedia3 announcement a while ago for the Radeon part. We hope to have something usable soon, but it certainly won't be done by their announced OS4 release date in Feb. But it will most definitely
be done for OS4.x, and I have had an AmigaOne on preorder as well for some time... Prometheus will be the first bridge supported, as that'a all that I have right now. We do intend to support Mediator if we can, but Elbox's sense of PR has kept me disgruntled with them and I have not signed/returned their NDA form yet, so we can't yet support Mediator but I'll do it soon, plus Mediator 1200 models at least will be more work due to their small memory window access point. Especially since some boards apparently work with 8MB
window setting and some other older boards only work well with the smaller 4MB window setting. Elbox PR said something about the trashed graphics in 8MB mode were some hardware dongle feature or something like that, but I find that hard to swallow... But we'll work it out at some point and find a Mediator owner to test it with. When I originally contacted DCE about supporting Grex a year ago or so now, I still have yet to receive any response at all from them. So I'm not sure they wanted Radeon drivers for their card which I thought was odd, but oh well. Perhaps I should try them again... AmigaOne will also be supported via the AGP slot. Regarding Pegasos, my NDA with ATI does not have "Morphos" written on it anywhere. But I got this NDA back before I knew of the Pegasos project at all and I run AmigaOS on my Amigas, not anything else, so Morphos at the time didn't have much meaning to my machines as none of them even have PPC cards. AmigaOS 3.9 and
AmigaOne/AmigaOS 4.x will be what we target while we consider if the effort in renegotiating the NDA is worth the returns from MorphOS users.
But please, don't run out and buy a Radeon card just yet. We may dongle-ize our drivers to some tag we set in Radeon cards we sell, in an effort to reduce P96 piracy. Elbox screwed the P96 guys, as not all Mediator users will pay the P96 "shareware fee" Elbox talked about. We are going to include fully licensed P96 (and possibly warp3d if they don't have licenses already with all PCI bridge companies) with Radeons we sell to guarantee both P96 team, warp3d team, and my company get return on our work. I don't intend to trash talk anyone, but piracy is a fact of life. We intend to circumvent that a bit, in the same way that PicassoIV did. PC store-bought Radeons may not work, just a warning.
As for the porting of Mediator/Grex drivers to OS4.x, I wonder how this will be done. Surely if OS4 runs on Elbox's SharkPPC they will port Mediator drivers to that OS4 implementation, but I'm not sure they'll let their drivers work on hardware other than Mediator+SharkPPC. DCE may not have Grex drivers work under OS4 on hardware other than Grex. Hopefully they will support more bridges/motherboards, especially Elbox since they charge extra
for their driver CDROM for Mediator anyway. We'll have to wait and see, but I'm not getting any hopes up. We'll be supporting any PCI bridge we can with Radeon drivers.
--
Bill Toner
Forefront Technologies, Inc. (previously Progressive Data Systems)
bill@prodatasys.com
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Details on ATI Radeon support in OS4 : Comment 23 of 61 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Bill Toner on 17-Jan-2002 03:45 GMT | In reply to Comment 21 (Seehund): > Please excuse my ignorance, but who is Bill Toner and what's his connection to the AmigaOne and/or AmigaOS 4?
Just some guy that wanted a Radeon in his machine and got an NDA from ATI to do it.
A newcommer in the commercial Amiga marketplace, who has published a small number of
hardware hacks on aminet (A2000 tower, lithium coin replacement for NiCD, a couple other small things I don't
remember), plus how to upgrade a Cyberstorm MK2 040 card to run an 060 on my web site.
(http://www.rit.edu/~wwt5491/csmk2.html for those who might care)
Pretty much a nobody to the vast majority of you. We're new guys in Amiga commercial project land.
I have absolutely no connection with AmigaOne or AmigaOS 4.x development. The Radeon driver
is an independent thing done by my business partner and myself. Radeon RV100 (original Radeon chipset)
and RV200 (released a few months ago) drivers for AmigaOS3.9 and AmigaOS4.x when we get a copy
in the same way that Phase 5 made the original PowerUP PPC drivers that ran on AmigaOS,
but were not really a part of the AmigaOS, or closer like CGX team that writes drivers for graphics
cards that are not really part of AmigaOS. We get absolutely no funding for our time and work
from Amiga Inc., AmigaOS, Eyetech, AmigaOne, or any other established Amiga company.
And in answer to people commenting on crackers and pirates will just strip off dongle code,
we're certainly aware of that eventuality. It will certainly be done by someone with lots of time
and coding talent. If people would accept our strategy, charging
a price in line with PC stores for the hardware portion of our package plus the driver license
fees added onto that (which would most likely be cheaper in most areas than buying Radeon at
PC store and our driver disk seperate), most of our profit margin would be the same profit margin
the PC stores average, coming from a directly comparable markup over the distributor cost to us,
the same cost to PC stores around here. It seems in the mailing list discussion most Amiga users
would rather pay that relatively small amount to a PC store instead of to people trying to
support Amiga. They can certainly wait for the drivers to be cracked and buy from a PC store,
pirating the license fees if they wish. That would certainly happen at some point in time for
them as an option. I just think it's sad that the 6 months I spent negotiating with ATI, the
time and effort we put into the drivers, and the money we pay to Warp3d/P96 teams in license
fees for their driver development kits and API usage to the customer are not worth any more
than a PC store hardware purchase that we get zero return on and would rather the price for the
drivers go up by $15 or $20, the markup range of most PC stores in this area for these cards,
where almost all of our profit margin would come from in our card/driver package. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|