28-Mar-2024 09:26 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Motorola Ships First 1 GHz Processor Implementing the PowerPC Instruction Set ArchitectureANN.lu
Posted on 28-Jan-2002 16:39 GMT by Christophe Decanini38 comments
View flat
View list
Here is the official Motorola Press release. More technical information was available in the What's New box, MPC7455 product on this page. The link is not working righ now. It was available a few minutes before. I guess the are doing changes
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous28-Jan-2002 16:06 GMT
Comment 2Gabriele Svelto28-Jan-2002 16:13 GMT
Comment 3Graham28-Jan-2002 16:42 GMT
Comment 4cOrpse28-Jan-2002 16:47 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous28-Jan-2002 16:53 GMT
Comment 6Alkis Tsapanidis28-Jan-2002 17:25 GMT
Comment 7sutro28-Jan-2002 17:33 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous28-Jan-2002 17:54 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous28-Jan-2002 17:57 GMT
Comment 10Radfoo28-Jan-2002 18:12 GMT
Comment 11cdfr28-Jan-2002 18:30 GMT
Comment 12[JC]28-Jan-2002 19:13 GMT
Comment 13quenthal28-Jan-2002 19:54 GMT
Comment 14quenthal28-Jan-2002 19:55 GMT
Comment 15Kay Are Ulvestad28-Jan-2002 20:01 GMT
Comment 16victor #28-Jan-2002 20:44 GMT
Motorola Ships First 1 GHz Processor Implementing the PowerPC Instruction Set Architecture : Comment 17 of 38ANN.lu
Posted by victor # on 28-Jan-2002 21:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 13 (quenthal):
Ohh, BTW, I think "GeForce4 MX" is a misprint. There is no such a product of NVidia, yet. At least, there is no mention of it on their web-site. So, I think it is really GeForce2 MX. Which means the faster CPU gives a nice boost also to 3D GFX (or more correctly, it does not slows it as much down).
Jump...
#18 quenthal
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 18quenthal28-Jan-2002 21:18 GMT
Comment 19cOrpse28-Jan-2002 21:28 GMT
Comment 20victor #28-Jan-2002 21:32 GMT
Comment 21Graham28-Jan-2002 21:47 GMT
Comment 22victor #28-Jan-2002 22:15 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous28-Jan-2002 23:32 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous28-Jan-2002 23:38 GMT
Comment 25Gabriele Svelto28-Jan-2002 23:44 GMT
Comment 26RudyG29-Jan-2002 06:47 GMT
Comment 27Jack29-Jan-2002 07:39 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous29-Jan-2002 11:18 GMT
Comment 29Ole-Egil Hvitmyren29-Jan-2002 12:20 GMT
Comment 30priest29-Jan-2002 12:35 GMT
Comment 31Lennart Fridén29-Jan-2002 15:20 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous29-Jan-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 33priest30-Jan-2002 06:04 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous30-Jan-2002 07:49 GMT
Comment 35Lennart Fridén30-Jan-2002 10:10 GMT
Comment 36priest30-Jan-2002 19:29 GMT
Comment 37priest31-Jan-2002 13:53 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous31-Jan-2002 15:01 GMT
Back to Top