20-Apr-2024 02:51 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Eyetech posted more AmigaOne information on the AmigOne MLANN.lu
Posted on 25-Feb-2002 19:04 GMT by Christophe Decanini56 comments
View flat
View list
You can read it here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1wouter25-Feb-2002 18:09 GMT
Comment 2redrumloa25-Feb-2002 18:36 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous25-Feb-2002 18:39 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous25-Feb-2002 18:41 GMT
Comment 54pLaY25-Feb-2002 19:06 GMT
Comment 6wouter25-Feb-2002 19:44 GMT
Comment 7Johan Forsberg25-Feb-2002 19:45 GMT
Comment 8NihilVor25-Feb-2002 20:15 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous25-Feb-2002 20:16 GMT
Comment 10Mike Veroukis25-Feb-2002 20:36 GMT
Comment 11redrumloa25-Feb-2002 20:50 GMT
Comment 12Mike Veroukis25-Feb-2002 20:59 GMT
Comment 13Paul25-Feb-2002 21:17 GMT
Comment 14Adam Kowalczyk25-Feb-2002 21:52 GMT
Comment 15Mike Veroukis25-Feb-2002 22:03 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous25-Feb-2002 22:29 GMT
Comment 17Adam Kowalczyk25-Feb-2002 22:58 GMT
Eyetech posted more AmigaOne information on the AmigOne ML : Comment 18 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by Solar on 26-Feb-2002 07:16 GMT
In reply to Comment 15 (Mike Veroukis):
> How good is LinuxPPC? Is it as good as the x86 version?
Out of the box, yes. Software support, no.
> Does it have all the same support for drivers and such?
Should have, basically. But applications require to be ported - that "just recompile" is, sadly, a myth under Linux. (It only works *after* the port has been done.)
> Does Red Hat support it?
SuSE does, not sure about RedHat.
> And of course, the big question... Would there be any issues of dual
> booting between LinuxPPC and AmigaOS4.0??? I'd probably prefer Linux
> for web browsing (until there's a viable web browser for the AmigaOS).
Technically, shouldn't. But didn't you hear Hyperion? Dual booting is EVIL! Oh, wait, that was dual booting on the x86 where they would loose their potential market... that should tell you something about software support on LinuxPPC...
:-/
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 19Sotiris Papageorgiou26-Feb-2002 08:03 GMT
Comment 20Mika Hanhijärvi26-Feb-2002 09:17 GMT
Comment 21Mika Hanhijärvi26-Feb-2002 09:23 GMT
Comment 22Jules26-Feb-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 23priest26-Feb-2002 10:36 GMT
Comment 24Alkis Tsapanidis26-Feb-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 25Tony Gore26-Feb-2002 11:54 GMT
Comment 26xchristofferx26-Feb-2002 13:06 GMT
Comment 27J4yDubs26-Feb-2002 13:20 GMT
Comment 28bennymee26-Feb-2002 14:16 GMT
Comment 29Troels Ersking26-Feb-2002 14:27 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous26-Feb-2002 15:02 GMT
Comment 31The_Editor26-Feb-2002 15:02 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous26-Feb-2002 15:41 GMT
Comment 33Rik Sweeney26-Feb-2002 15:53 GMT
Comment 34Rik Sweeney26-Feb-2002 15:54 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous26-Feb-2002 15:56 GMT
Comment 36Mika Hanhijärvi26-Feb-2002 16:33 GMT
Comment 37bennymee26-Feb-2002 16:34 GMT
Comment 38Mika Hanhijärvi26-Feb-2002 16:40 GMT
Comment 39Troels Ersking26-Feb-2002 17:17 GMT
Comment 40ehaines26-Feb-2002 17:29 GMT
Comment 41The_Editor26-Feb-2002 17:47 GMT
Comment 42Frank Gutschow26-Feb-2002 19:01 GMT
Comment 43The_Editor26-Feb-2002 19:05 GMT
Comment 44Troels Ersking26-Feb-2002 19:10 GMT
Comment 45The_Editor26-Feb-2002 19:13 GMT
Comment 46J4yDubs26-Feb-2002 19:47 GMT
Comment 47Anonymous26-Feb-2002 21:08 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous26-Feb-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 49Frank27-Feb-2002 00:58 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous27-Feb-2002 01:14 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous27-Feb-2002 03:38 GMT
Comment 52Trizt27-Feb-2002 07:21 GMT
Comment 53Anonymous27-Feb-2002 08:04 GMT
Comment 54John Klumpp27-Feb-2002 10:49 GMT
Comment 55Amifan27-Feb-2002 10:49 GMT
Comment 56John Klumpp27-Feb-2002 11:02 GMT
Back to Top