24-Apr-2024 23:00 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amigaone has the Mentor ARC ARTICIA S chipset: is it a TERON CX board ?ANN.lu
Posted on 27-Feb-2002 15:17 GMT by Christophe Decanini76 comments
View flat
View list
If you look at the pitures of the AmigaOne you can see the brand/model of the NorthBridge. Here is a link that give you more information about it. I like particularly this article that says Pentium 3, Pentium 4 performance at half the price. The Amigaone look to be exactely a Teron CX. Lets just hope that YOU guys order enough AmigaOne to get lower and lower prices. I guess Bplan used the Articia S to build the Pegasos.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1shIva27-Feb-2002 14:23 GMT
Comment 2anonymous27-Feb-2002 14:29 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous27-Feb-2002 14:31 GMT
Comment 4priest27-Feb-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 5ko27-Feb-2002 14:44 GMT
Comment 6priest27-Feb-2002 14:48 GMT
Comment 7Christophe Decanini27-Feb-2002 14:48 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous27-Feb-2002 14:50 GMT
Comment 9Adam Kowalczyk27-Feb-2002 14:55 GMT
Comment 10Mika Hanhijärvi27-Feb-2002 14:57 GMT
Comment 11redrumloa27-Feb-2002 15:07 GMT
Amigaone has the Mentor ARC ARTICIA S chipset: is it a TERON CX board ? : Comment 12 of 76ANN.lu
Posted by Adam Kowalczyk on 27-Feb-2002 15:14 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (Anonymous):
The similarities are uncanny. Even the silk screen on the board is the same. Why would the same design be build in two locations when at this stage of the game open PPC boards are non-existant? I do not question that ESCENA designed and built a PCI interface for an A1200. MAI surely would have no interest or experience in doing this. I'm not sure why this is even needed any more. This new AmigaOne will mean people can "retire" their old hardware on to another generation of Amiga hobbyists. I know it's going to be hard to not have the urge to plug something into your A4000 and A1200 because that's the way it's been for the last 10 years. Maybe an organization needs to be started, like "Amiga Expansion Addicts Anonymous". It could be run by the same group of people who just recently retired their VIC-20's.
There is no shame in the AmigaOne not being a design out of Eyetech. Eyetech is still going to be responsible for the integration and reselling of the machine which is someting I'm sure MAI doesn't do. MAI makes a chipset and they had to make a PPC board to sell their chipsets. When other companies see that their good at making chipsets and can use them in a reference design, you might see others making boards. The MAI boards are the solution to a problem that literally fell from the sky. I doubt they even knew that a market for their boards existed for Amiga users waiting patiently for new hardware. It's a fact of life. It's called outsourcing. Even Apple has some if not all of their boards made by Flextronics. I cannot recall which cell phone maker handed over the manufacturing responsibility to Flextronics as well. It's the way of the world and it's a good thing as it allows the company's to concentrate on their core strengths.
Do you think Apple executives care where the new iMac is made or who makes it? Flextronics makes that as well. The only thing about it that's Apple is it's design. It's kind of like a Volkswagen in North America. The only thing German about Jetta's and Beetles is the design as they come out of factories in Mexico and other parts of South America. Do you think Microsoft makes the Xbox? I believe the Xbox is built by Flextronics in Hungary.
I apologize for the rant, but I just cannot understand why who made the board or where the board was made is such a big issue. Frankly, I'm happy it's not DCE as the many examples of failed CSPPC's makes many question their quality. I cannot emphasize enough how good of a business decision it is to take advantage of something that exists and works! Don't reinvent the wheel, when someone already designed it and can sell you them in the quantities you want. Yes, you lose some control, but offload a good portion of responsibility.
Adam
Jump...
#29 Don Cox #61 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 13Seehund27-Feb-2002 15:15 GMT
Comment 14Radfoo27-Feb-2002 15:17 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous27-Feb-2002 15:18 GMT
Comment 16redrumloa27-Feb-2002 15:20 GMT
Comment 17Seehund27-Feb-2002 15:21 GMT
Comment 18Rik Sweeney27-Feb-2002 15:24 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous27-Feb-2002 15:26 GMT
Comment 20priest27-Feb-2002 15:29 GMT
Comment 21Ben27-Feb-2002 15:33 GMT
Comment 22priest27-Feb-2002 15:35 GMT
Comment 23Christophe Decanini27-Feb-2002 15:41 GMT
Comment 24Adam Kowalczyk27-Feb-2002 15:42 GMT
Comment 25justin27-Feb-2002 15:48 GMT
Comment 26Adam Kowalczyk27-Feb-2002 15:52 GMT
Comment 27Lasse Bodilsen27-Feb-2002 15:58 GMT
Comment 28Christophe Decanini27-Feb-2002 15:58 GMT
Comment 29Don Cox27-Feb-2002 16:04 GMT
Comment 30Christophe Decanini27-Feb-2002 16:06 GMT
Comment 31Adam Kowalczyk27-Feb-2002 16:07 GMT
Comment 32Mika Hanhijärvi27-Feb-2002 16:33 GMT
Comment 33Mika Hanhijärvi27-Feb-2002 16:36 GMT
Comment 34Mika Hanhijärvi27-Feb-2002 16:41 GMT
Comment 35Alkemyst27-Feb-2002 17:01 GMT
Comment 36Graham27-Feb-2002 17:01 GMT
Comment 37Tony Gore27-Feb-2002 17:39 GMT
Comment 38Graham27-Feb-2002 17:47 GMT
Comment 39Paul Qureshi27-Feb-2002 18:01 GMT
Comment 40cOrpse27-Feb-2002 19:00 GMT
Comment 41Christophe Decanini27-Feb-2002 19:02 GMT
Comment 42cOrpse27-Feb-2002 19:08 GMT
Comment 43Graham27-Feb-2002 19:30 GMT
Comment 44Amifan27-Feb-2002 19:59 GMT
Comment 45Amifan27-Feb-2002 20:47 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous27-Feb-2002 21:12 GMT
Comment 47Don Cox27-Feb-2002 21:18 GMT
Comment 48Don Cox27-Feb-2002 21:22 GMT
Comment 49Michael27-Feb-2002 22:16 GMT
Comment 50Neil Thomas27-Feb-2002 22:41 GMT
Comment 51Graham27-Feb-2002 22:47 GMT
Comment 52redrumloa27-Feb-2002 23:01 GMT
Comment 53John Block28-Feb-2002 00:08 GMT
Comment 54Graham28-Feb-2002 00:10 GMT
Comment 55Dr. Righteous28-Feb-2002 00:59 GMT
Comment 56Graham28-Feb-2002 01:35 GMT
Comment 57YttriumOx28-Feb-2002 05:19 GMT
Comment 58priest28-Feb-2002 05:38 GMT
Comment 59José28-Feb-2002 11:31 GMT
Comment 60Tony Gore28-Feb-2002 11:39 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous28-Feb-2002 12:13 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous28-Feb-2002 13:06 GMT
Comment 63Darrin28-Feb-2002 13:58 GMT
Comment 64Troels Ersking28-Feb-2002 16:32 GMT
Comment 65David Scheibler28-Feb-2002 16:38 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous28-Feb-2002 19:34 GMT
Comment 67[JC]28-Feb-2002 21:45 GMT
Comment 68Seehund28-Feb-2002 23:43 GMT
Comment 69tinman01-Mar-2002 00:54 GMT
Comment 70Anonymous01-Mar-2002 09:35 GMT
Comment 71priest01-Mar-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 72priest01-Mar-2002 09:59 GMT
Comment 73Anonymous01-Mar-2002 17:15 GMT
Comment 74Anonymous01-Mar-2002 17:16 GMT
Comment 75Anonymous01-Mar-2002 17:35 GMT
Comment 76priest01-Mar-2002 17:40 GMT
Back to Top