|[News] OS3.9 Boingbag 2 available||ANN.lu|
|Posted on 20-Mar-2002 18:03 GMT by Christian Kemp||125 comments|
Jarmo Laakkonen writes:
H&P is proud to announce the availability of Boing Bag 2 for AmigaOS 3.9
OS 3.9: Boing Bag 2 available now!
20. March 2002: H&P is proud to announce the availability of Boing Bag 2
for AmigaOS 3.9. Boing Bag 3.9-2 contains many bug fixes, small
enhancement and new features in the areas multimedia (AMPlifier, PlayCD,
sound datatype), shell, Workbench (Find, AsyncWB, UnArc, XAD v10),
ReAction and harddisk support. The Boing Bag is delivered in three parts:
The main archive with all the files needed to update AmigaOS 3.9, the
translations into different languages and the contributions (CDDB library,
OpenURL, ClassAction). We want to thank all people that made it possible.
Please download at least the main archive and the translation(s) for the
language(s) you desire. The contributions are optional.
Note: This Update requires AmigaOS 3.9 with Boing Bag 1. AmigaOS XL users
can install the Boing Bag 2 directly.
|List of all comments to this article|
|OS3.9 Boingbag 2 available : Comment 88 of 125||ANN.lu|
|Posted by darklite on 21-Mar-2002 18:36 GMT|
|In reply to Comment 75 (Christophe Decanini):|
>It is very often that you are provocative.
And the obvious anti-x86 crap like "why do you need an amithlon x86 divx player, you can use media player in windows?" isn't?
Just like Bill says, you seem to 'miss' those all the time.
>I don't blame them to have expressed their opinion but sometimes I feel that there is an amiga news >that has nothing to do with x86 vs PPC or Amithlon vs AmigaOS 4 etc and that you turn it into this >flamewar and everytime they backed you up.
>At the end instead of having comments on the thread we have a flamewar.
When they backed me up it was not to have some silly flameware, but because trolls were spreading x86 FUD again. You won't see me insulting people all the time, but argumenting my point. That can't be said for the anti-x86 crew, they just start calling me <censored>, <censored> and <censored> without even trying to give some good arguments (prolly because there are none).
>It is not censorship of Amithlon, it is censorship of your provocative attitude.
And *only* of *my* provocative attitude.
>Oh, *I* am dividing the Amiga community, I (but not only me) who repeatedly
>>advocated cross-compiling and compatible API's between x86 and PPC?
>By setting up flamewar you participate in a "spiritual split"
"spiritual split"... good one.
>>Not Amiga Inc who obviously don't give a damn about the 'classic' Amiga (how
>>about a statement about x86 AmigaOS, it's all been vary vague - a simple yes
>>or no will do), or Hyperion who stab little Bill Gates voodoo dolls and sh*t
>>their pants every time someone mentions x86. It's sad that even you believe
>>their pathetic x86 FUD, which makes no sense at all BTW.
>AmigaINC do not post on ANN.
What does that have to do with anything?
>Hyperion did and I should have removed some posts like the BeOS thing that was targetting pro x86
>guys. It just happened when I was away. Next time I will do it.
Should have, would have, ... You're starting to sound like Amiga Inc.
>>>You blame Hyperion, Bplan, whoever but at least they don't have a bunch of
>>>trolls that come here regularly to provocate people.
>>You are one of them, but you don't seem to realise.
>I could be as a ANN users (some comments) but never as a moderator. If so I would have deleted a lot
>of stuff that I disliked and added a lot of posts to make a point about something.
>Perhaps I should have a nickname so you would not mix my two sides.
And I say it's pretty obvious you're moderation is subjective sometimes.
>>You removed a perfectly fine post, there was nothing provocative about the
>>post in itself.
>This post was made to make your point
I can honestly say I didn't think of adding that comment until after I submitted the news item.
>it was not an Amiga news
It IS Amiga news, as the new Amigas will run PPC cpu's.
And it certainly is more related to Amiga than any MS trial.
>>I'm sure Christian wouldn't have deleted it.
>Perhaps not because Christian is not around that much. I'am sure i delete more posts than he does.
That's not the point, the point is that Christian wouldn't have deleted it.
You could have just deleted my comment BTW.
>> Also, I would *never* add my own opinion to a news item. The comment was a joke, hence the
>>smiley. Plus most other comments were very interesting.
>A smiley does not give the right to do everything.
>A lot of people reading you do not see the smiley and jump into the flamewar.
So it's my fault people don't see the smiley?
Shall I add <JOKE> tags next time, maybe 10 to be sure? That would ruin the joke though.
>>Whatever you say, I believe you deleted that post because it wasn't positive
>>about the powerpc. Yet, any post about someone sueing Microsoft never gets
>>deleted, isn't that ironic?
>No you are plain wrong. i want amiga news thats all. i missed the MS post. i would have deleted it.
It wasn't Amiga news *AT ALL*? Read above.
"I missed the MS post"... I don't believe you
>Christian will perhaps do a new category for this kind of posts.
>It will save my time as I won't administrate it.
I wouldn't mind... But I guess Christian doesn't trust me, because I might be biased :/
|List of all comments to this article (continued)||