19-Apr-2024 10:36 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga updates websiteANN.lu
Posted on 10-May-2002 07:11 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä50 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga have updated their website with a new entry page and a specific AmigaOS site.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Mikey C10-May-2002 05:40 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous10-May-2002 05:58 GMT
Comment 3Trizt10-May-2002 06:05 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous10-May-2002 07:31 GMT
Comment 5so excited10-May-2002 07:57 GMT
Comment 6James Whelan10-May-2002 08:00 GMT
Comment 7chrleon10-May-2002 08:14 GMT
Comment 8Rik Sweeney10-May-2002 08:15 GMT
Comment 9RIk Sweeney10-May-2002 08:30 GMT
Comment 10DaveW10-May-2002 08:53 GMT
Comment 11José10-May-2002 08:56 GMT
Comment 12m0ns00n10-May-2002 09:19 GMT
Comment 13gz10-May-2002 09:25 GMT
Comment 14gz10-May-2002 09:37 GMT
Comment 15zurt10-May-2002 10:01 GMT
Comment 16prosiak10-May-2002 10:32 GMT
Comment 17so excited10-May-2002 10:34 GMT
Comment 18Paolo "Mod3m" D'Urso10-May-2002 10:43 GMT
Comment 19nOw210-May-2002 10:43 GMT
Comment 20Rik Sweeney10-May-2002 11:44 GMT
Comment 21Troels Ersking10-May-2002 11:57 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous10-May-2002 12:09 GMT
Comment 23Flinx10-May-2002 12:14 GMT
Comment 24DaveW10-May-2002 12:17 GMT
Comment 25Paolo "Mod3m" D'Urso10-May-2002 12:46 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous10-May-2002 12:51 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous10-May-2002 12:55 GMT
Comment 28Dagon (HELLAS)10-May-2002 13:07 GMT
Comment 29Ville Sarell10-May-2002 13:29 GMT
Comment 30Björn Hagström10-May-2002 13:43 GMT
Comment 31Janne Sirén10-May-2002 14:07 GMT
Comment 32AlBolone10-May-2002 14:11 GMT
Comment 33Trizt10-May-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 34Trizt10-May-2002 14:17 GMT
Comment 35Troels Ersking10-May-2002 16:02 GMT
Comment 36Don Cox10-May-2002 16:20 GMT
Comment 37Janne Sirén10-May-2002 16:24 GMT
Comment 38Janne Sirén10-May-2002 16:31 GMT
Comment 39Troels Ersking10-May-2002 16:42 GMT
Comment 40Bert10-May-2002 20:06 GMT
Comment 41Björn Hagström10-May-2002 20:22 GMT
Comment 42KenH10-May-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 43tinman10-May-2002 21:40 GMT
Comment 44gz11-May-2002 06:05 GMT
Comment 45Troels Ersking11-May-2002 07:28 GMT
Amiga updates website : Comment 46 of 50ANN.lu
Posted by DaveW on 11-May-2002 08:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 27 (Anonymous):
> You're right, Sorry, don't know who I thought you were, but you certainly aren't one of the eternal Amiga apologists.
Thank you.
<moonlighting mode on>
I do however tend to buy into technology just before it becomes widely available to the general public, thus I do have money down on A1G3 along with over a hundred dealer and developer groups ( order quantities for each group are unknown ). I have bought and developed software on the DE platform which ( the software I have written ) may never see the light of day because there is currently not a large enough distribution cycle or userbase to make sales worthwhile.
Because I dont write games or user productivity software. I write small to large business applications infrastructure software ( as well as assotiated development tooling ) and if A1G3 offers good price/performance for the suite I maintain then I will probably be looking to bundle the hardware/software together as bespoke solutions - either in Linux or native AmigaOS format.
Currently I favour the AmigaOS format because of the tighter coupling of screen control to the user applications and the lower runtime memory footprint that results. Thus the ability to reskin the user interface controls, public screens, varying resolutions and USB connectivity will be important aspects of why I need to evaluate AOS4 and A1G3 sooner rather than later. Hence early adopting.
The fact that A1G3 is being produced by a far eastern manufacturer of which Eyetech is not its only customer adds to its credibility in my eyes. I could not bet my busines ventures on top of PPC add on cards. If its a TeronCx well good. It means that if A1G3 goes tits up ( unlikely at the mo ) I can still source boards in quantity if the evaluation goes well.
Will I be selling to the traditional Amiga userbase? Well I wont exclude anyone if they think they want a copy or a resellers solution package. Because I dont see myself relying on the existing userbase I see no reason to be an apologist, its just a matter of balancing business risks to me.
Will I be competing with ACM? I dont know yet and that worries me. There may be an opportunity for some reengineering but until DE gets targgetted for some more powerful hardware it is less attractive to me other than as a client access device that may be of use to field operatives on the move.
Yes I currently have PC based software tooling but the main problem is the myriad of hardware alternatives as well as the unsuitability of the Windows platform to act as either a very thin client or a mid range operating system at a reasonable price/maintenance point. The ability to change roles is also limited.
The Linux world is still too unstable and the top end IBM world where I get the support, stability and OS credibility that is required the solutions are too expensive for my target market.
At the moment, AOS4.x and A1G3, on paper, seem like an excellent business proposition for a killer business productivity suite. On a dual 300Mhz RS6k the suite flies, on Win2K on a 1400 AMD it just about keeps up. Those clients that were hoping to get much greater performance out of Win2K coupled to higher end AMD kit were dissapointed. The 2CPU licenses for businesses is quite excessive too.
The overall price/performance ratio I get out of well engineered PPC based systems running on big-endian is superior as of now. If AmigaOS coupled with A1G3 continues that run I can spend even more on tighter integration of the suite with the OS and get better value out of the solutions package.
My concern? Memory protection.
Because my income does not rely on this in the slightest I can afford the wait. Others could not and they made their choices. As a home OS AmigaOS3.x leaves much to be desired. Heres looking forward to the improvements.
Dave.
<moonlighting mode off>
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 47Ian Shurmer11-May-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 48DaveW11-May-2002 13:18 GMT
Comment 49Gingerbread Man11-May-2002 17:11 GMT
Comment 50KenH11-May-2002 20:52 GMT
Back to Top