25-Apr-2024 03:31 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] The Register : Amiganauts rave over Matrox G1000ANN.lu
Posted on 10-May-2002 18:37 GMT by Christophe Decanini48 comments
View flat
View list
From The Register: Mr. Ben Hermans posted to ANN.lu about "spill the beans" over Matrox G1000 for OS4. You can find out more on the register article here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Marcus Sundman10-May-2002 16:41 GMT
Comment 2Marcus Sundman10-May-2002 16:51 GMT
Comment 3Christophe Decanini10-May-2002 17:00 GMT
Comment 4Christian Kemp10-May-2002 17:13 GMT
Comment 5Christian Kemp10-May-2002 17:15 GMT
Comment 6Christophe Decanini10-May-2002 17:22 GMT
Comment 7Bill Hoggett10-May-2002 17:57 GMT
Comment 8Ben Hermans/Hyperion10-May-2002 18:02 GMT
Comment 9ANoneeMouse10-May-2002 18:39 GMT
Comment 10Graham10-May-2002 19:10 GMT
Comment 11Troels Ersking10-May-2002 19:15 GMT
Comment 12David Scheibler10-May-2002 20:21 GMT
Comment 133seas10-May-2002 20:23 GMT
Comment 14Steff10-May-2002 20:31 GMT
Comment 15Duncan Snowden10-May-2002 22:16 GMT
Comment 16Tony Gore10-May-2002 22:27 GMT
Comment 17Nicolas Sallin10-May-2002 22:41 GMT
Comment 18Tony Gore10-May-2002 22:47 GMT
Comment 19Ian@home10-May-2002 22:52 GMT
Comment 20Chal10-May-2002 23:27 GMT
Comment 21dammy11-May-2002 03:49 GMT
Comment 22cybereye11-May-2002 04:14 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous11-May-2002 05:57 GMT
Comment 24EyeAm11-May-2002 07:32 GMT
Comment 25DaveW11-May-2002 08:45 GMT
Comment 26David Scheibler11-May-2002 08:58 GMT
Comment 27Tony Gore11-May-2002 09:54 GMT
Comment 28windtalkers11-May-2002 12:15 GMT
Comment 29Graham11-May-2002 12:19 GMT
Comment 30Tony Gore11-May-2002 13:23 GMT
Comment 31szutoman11-May-2002 14:34 GMT
Comment 32Don Cox11-May-2002 14:36 GMT
Comment 33Nicolas Sallin11-May-2002 14:37 GMT
Comment 34Gingerbread Man11-May-2002 15:11 GMT
Comment 35Tony Gore11-May-2002 18:25 GMT
Comment 36Nicolas Sallin11-May-2002 18:42 GMT
Comment 37tinman11-May-2002 19:16 GMT
The Register : Amiganauts rave over Matrox G1000 : Comment 38 of 48ANN.lu
Posted by Tony Gore on 11-May-2002 20:26 GMT
In reply to Comment 36 (Nicolas Sallin):
"Bah, think what you want. "
And you do the same.
"We" isn't "I"
we
\We\ (w[=e]), pron.; pl. of I. [Poss. Our (our) or Ours (ourz); obj. Us ([u^]s). See I.] [As. w[=e]; akin to OS. w[=i], OFries. & LG. wi, D. wij, G. wir, Icel. v[=e]r, Sw. & Dan. vi, Goth. weis, Skr. vayam. [root]190.] The plural nominative case of the pronoun of the first person; the word with which a person in speaking or writing denotes a number or company of which he is one, as the subject of an action expressed by a verb.
"He just reported what a person who really saw the chip in action told
him. Btw, he should have corrected the G1000 name. Matrox decided to
not use this kind of number name anymore."
_Could_ be true, but he didn't say that. As far as the name, you are right. Haig over at Matrox has said that they will not use numbers and it will be a single word, and that most already knew it. My guess is "Parhelia". But then again, I guess the rest of us will have to wait until Tuesday to find out everything.
Anyway, good to know something nice is on the way from Matrox. This other stuff is just "filler" until we know more.
Jump...
#41 Martin Blom
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 39KenH11-May-2002 20:59 GMT
Comment 40Ben Hermans/Hyperion12-May-2002 09:02 GMT
Comment 41Martin Blom12-May-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 42Martin Blom12-May-2002 09:40 GMT
Comment 43Alkemyst12-May-2002 10:16 GMT
Comment 44KenH12-May-2002 11:24 GMT
Comment 45Alkemyst12-May-2002 12:07 GMT
Comment 46KenH12-May-2002 12:22 GMT
Comment 47Alkemyst12-May-2002 12:54 GMT
Comment 48Tony Gore12-May-2002 13:59 GMT
Back to Top