19-Apr-2024 07:02 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] the next ppc amigaANN.lu
Posted on 19-May-2002 14:10 GMT by jah359 comments
View flat
View list
i noticed a new video on aminet:
http://www.aminet.net/pix/mpg/Pegasos.mpg
"This is a demo video of bPlan's Pegasos computer. The video has been created by Thendic-France to give an impression of how the machine runs."
the download is still in progress, but i'm sure it will finish to convince all amiga users thats the ppc amiga they are waiting since years is finally arrived
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1amigammc19-May-2002 12:15 GMT
Comment 2DaveW19-May-2002 12:19 GMT
Comment 3jah19-May-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 4DaveW19-May-2002 12:35 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous19-May-2002 12:41 GMT
Comment 6DaveW19-May-2002 12:52 GMT
Comment 7[JC]19-May-2002 12:55 GMT
Comment 8Ugr19-May-2002 13:03 GMT
Comment 9DaveW19-May-2002 13:07 GMT
Comment 10Graham19-May-2002 13:50 GMT
Comment 11André Siegel19-May-2002 13:53 GMT
Comment 12Samface19-May-2002 14:01 GMT
Comment 13Elektro19-May-2002 14:04 GMT
Comment 144pLaY19-May-2002 14:07 GMT
Comment 15David Scheibler19-May-2002 14:10 GMT
Comment 16Darrin19-May-2002 14:11 GMT
Comment 17Kronos19-May-2002 14:11 GMT
Comment 18Johan "Graak" Forsberg19-May-2002 14:11 GMT
Comment 19Kronos19-May-2002 14:12 GMT
Comment 20David Scheibler19-May-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 21Johan "Graak" Forsberg19-May-2002 14:16 GMT
Comment 22Kronos19-May-2002 14:17 GMT
Comment 23David Scheibler19-May-2002 14:17 GMT
Comment 24David Scheibler19-May-2002 14:23 GMT
Comment 25Johan "Graak" Forsberg19-May-2002 14:24 GMT
Comment 26jah19-May-2002 14:30 GMT
Comment 27Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 14:31 GMT
Comment 28the man in the shadows19-May-2002 14:33 GMT
Comment 29Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 14:35 GMT
Comment 30Kronos19-May-2002 14:36 GMT
Comment 31Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-May-2002 14:39 GMT
Comment 32Kronos19-May-2002 14:48 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous19-May-2002 14:52 GMT
Comment 34CMOS19-May-2002 14:56 GMT
Comment 35Kronos19-May-2002 14:56 GMT
Comment 36z519-May-2002 14:58 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous19-May-2002 15:01 GMT
Comment 38Troels ersking19-May-2002 15:01 GMT
Comment 39Don Cox19-May-2002 15:04 GMT
Comment 40[JC]19-May-2002 15:14 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous19-May-2002 15:19 GMT
Comment 42Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 15:20 GMT
Comment 43Ugr19-May-2002 15:24 GMT
Comment 44Ugr19-May-2002 15:28 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous19-May-2002 15:30 GMT
Comment 46Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 15:32 GMT
Comment 47Anonymous19-May-2002 15:34 GMT
Comment 48Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 15:35 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous19-May-2002 15:40 GMT
Comment 50Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 15:44 GMT
Comment 51CD32Freak19-May-2002 16:11 GMT
Comment 52Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-May-2002 16:12 GMT
Comment 53Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 16:14 GMT
Comment 54David Scheibler19-May-2002 16:14 GMT
Comment 55Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 16:19 GMT
Comment 56Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 16:21 GMT
Comment 57Kronos19-May-2002 16:25 GMT
Comment 58DaveW19-May-2002 16:27 GMT
Comment 59Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-May-2002 16:27 GMT
Comment 60Rik Sweeney19-May-2002 16:29 GMT
Comment 61DaveW19-May-2002 16:31 GMT
Comment 62David Scheibler19-May-2002 16:32 GMT
Comment 63Kronos19-May-2002 16:34 GMT
Comment 64David Scheibler19-May-2002 16:35 GMT
Comment 65Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 16:35 GMT
Comment 66Darrin19-May-2002 16:37 GMT
Comment 67Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 16:38 GMT
Comment 68SteveW19-May-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 69Kronos19-May-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 70Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 16:40 GMT
Comment 71cOrpse19-May-2002 16:41 GMT
Comment 72Darrin19-May-2002 16:46 GMT
Comment 73cOrpse19-May-2002 16:48 GMT
Comment 74Kronos19-May-2002 16:49 GMT
Comment 75Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 16:52 GMT
Comment 76cOrpse19-May-2002 16:56 GMT
Comment 77CMOS19-May-2002 16:58 GMT
Comment 78Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-May-2002 16:59 GMT
Comment 79David Scheibler19-May-2002 17:00 GMT
Comment 80cOrpse19-May-2002 17:01 GMT
Comment 81David Scheibler19-May-2002 17:02 GMT
Comment 82cOrpse19-May-2002 17:05 GMT
Comment 83Anonymous19-May-2002 17:06 GMT
Comment 84David Scheibler19-May-2002 17:07 GMT
Comment 85cOrpse19-May-2002 17:09 GMT
Comment 86Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 17:16 GMT
Comment 87Anonymous19-May-2002 17:21 GMT
Comment 88cOrpse19-May-2002 17:23 GMT
Comment 89Alkis Tsapanidis19-May-2002 17:25 GMT
Comment 90[JC]19-May-2002 17:29 GMT
Comment 91Darrin19-May-2002 17:30 GMT
Comment 92David Scheibler19-May-2002 17:39 GMT
Comment 93Darrin19-May-2002 17:42 GMT
Comment 94cOrpse19-May-2002 17:46 GMT
Comment 95[JC]19-May-2002 17:48 GMT
Comment 96David Scheibler19-May-2002 17:57 GMT
Comment 97Anonymous19-May-2002 18:04 GMT
Comment 98Graham19-May-2002 18:08 GMT
Comment 99Leki19-May-2002 18:15 GMT
Comment 100Leki19-May-2002 18:26 GMT
the next ppc amiga : Comment 101 of 359ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 19-May-2002 18:29 GMT
In reply to Comment 95 ([JC]):
>>Standard for a PC and a Mac, but new ground to the Amiga, mostly anyway.
True, but I'm sure that all Amiga owners/users know what these ports are. I wasn't expecting the Yeti to spend as much time as he did going over them - I wanted to see more software RUNNING.
>>At least we can see proof of it actually running anything at all. And how do YOU know that it'll crash ? Is this in the same way that Windows always crashes but yet my Windows 2000 PC has never once had a bluescreen ?
But how do I know that it WILL NOT crash? I'm sorry, but I wanted to see stuff RUNNING (didn't I just say that?). To me, the actual MOS part was far too short - it showed nothing. Hell, the music at the end played for longer!!!
>>Well, it takes a lot of expensive video equipment to fix that problem. You can even see it happening on professional broadcasts. The only way they could've fixed it would've been to capture output directly from the VGA or so, and that's still complex and fairly expensive to do.
No, it's not expensive. You hit the nail n the head when you said they could have captured the output directly from the VGA output and used a cheap ($50) converter to at least show us a CLEAR 640x480 or 800x600 display. You must agree we me when I say that you can only just make out what's happening on the screen.
>>Not true, because Amiga own no trademark on the word "Workbench", and even if they did, it'd be thrown out of court the same way as Microsoft's trademark on the word "Windows" has been, therefore MorphOS is free to call it's desktop "Workbench".
You're missing the point here. That's not MOS WORKBENCH running on the video, it's AMIGA WORKBENCH. It's not MOS's desktop that's in the demo, but Amiga's. They're supposed to be writing a replacement desktop, but all this demo does is show Pegasos running an old (and possibly illegal version of MOS if it was to be sold like this commercially) version of MOS. And if MOS can legally use Amiga's code and Workbench then why are they spending months re-writing it? Hmmmm.
>>Furthermore, unless it can be proven that there is actual binary code that belongs to Amiga Inc running, it isn't illegal for it to run a workalike.
No it isn't. But this looks like the "real" thing to me.
>>Most of the other ports are components of the VIA 686B southgate chip. I should imagine therefore that they do work, since as I am using a PC using one of these chips, and it all works just fine for me. If you meant drivers, well, drivers are just a matter of code, and as Linux and BSD supports that stuff pretty well, I'd say it's likely MorphOS will too.
I agree. My point is that none of this stuff will be available to a comercial user until the Workbench replacement is finished AND the drivers are written. Until then, we have to ASSUME that the hardware on the bPlan dev-board is functional and is supported... but we have no proof. I remember seeing a BoXeR motherboard with all sorts of goodies on it - none of which worked.
> 3. The Pegasos has a G3 card available and it WILL take a dual G4
> and a G5. Well, as there is no G5 card available as they don't have
> a G5 chip to make this claim, we can only suppose that the dual G4
> is vapour too.
>>Thats a bit of a stupid statement to make.
Have you SEEN one working? Me neither, so I stand by my statement. I'm sure if one existed then it would have been in the video.
>>Well, you can be sure for certain that the AmigaONE never will <have a G4/G5>, unless you're any good with a soldering iron.
No arguments from me here. There's no way on this Earth I'm spending $550 on a motherboard only to attack it with a soldering iron. I'm simply planning on selling my old A1 board and buying an A2 later. I've lost count of how many PC's I've gone through and I seriously doubt that the Pegasos motherboard will still be the best solution to attach a G5 to when it comes out. Of course, I could be wrong, but you can't shove a P4 processor into a P1 socket.
>>I seriously don't get it. If this hardware had come out 2-3 years ago, it'd have been met by the Amiga community with great joy.
It still could be if bPlan provided the hardware to Hyperion for the production of OS4 for the Pegasos AND bPlan agreed to sell a working OS4 with the bPlan board IF THE CUSTOMER asked for it.
Instead bPlan are trying to use the Amiga name so sell something that's "not an Amiga". They have no interest in working WITH AMiga Inc and are doing everything in their power to undermine them. THAT'S the problem, not the hardware.
>>But now, AInc want to be greedy and keep all the market from themselves.
It's THEIR market - they paid for it. When you buy a house with your own money, you don't want to come home and find sqatters living in it, eating your food and trashing your furniture, It's Amiga Inc's "house" and "bPlan" are trying to "squat".
>>the loyal blind followers of Amiga cast hate upon it and MorphOS with it.
No, I once had an open mind, but after reading some of Ralf Schmidt's attacks and lies on ANN, it became quite clear who the good guys were.
I think we can both pat ourselves on the back here. We're having a civil debate with no name calling or abusive language... the way it should be :)
Jump...
#103 David Scheibler #115 [JC] #121 Anonymous #145 Alkis Tsapanidis #210 Ruediger Hanke
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 102anon19-May-2002 18:35 GMT
Comment 103David Scheibler19-May-2002 18:37 GMT
Comment 104Anonymous19-May-2002 18:40 GMT
Comment 105Anonymous19-May-2002 18:45 GMT
Comment 106Ole-Egil19-May-2002 18:48 GMT
Comment 107Janne Sirén19-May-2002 18:49 GMT
Comment 108Denis Troller19-May-2002 18:50 GMT
Comment 109Anonymous19-May-2002 18:50 GMT
Comment 110Graham19-May-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 111Darrin19-May-2002 18:53 GMT
Comment 112Anonymous19-May-2002 18:55 GMT
Comment 113David Scheibler19-May-2002 18:58 GMT
Comment 114David Scheibler19-May-2002 19:00 GMT
Comment 115[JC]19-May-2002 19:03 GMT
Comment 116Anonymous19-May-2002 19:03 GMT
Comment 117Anonymous19-May-2002 19:04 GMT
Comment 118[JC]19-May-2002 19:07 GMT
Comment 119Darrin19-May-2002 19:08 GMT
Comment 120Graham19-May-2002 19:11 GMT
Comment 121Anonymous19-May-2002 19:14 GMT
Comment 122Graham19-May-2002 19:18 GMT
Comment 123Anonymous19-May-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 124Janne Sirén19-May-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 125Darrin19-May-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 126Darrin19-May-2002 19:22 GMT
Comment 127Janne Sirén19-May-2002 19:24 GMT
Comment 128Darrin19-May-2002 19:32 GMT
Comment 129Anonymous19-May-2002 19:32 GMT
Comment 130Anonymous19-May-2002 19:33 GMT
Comment 131Anonymous19-May-2002 19:38 GMT
Comment 132Janne Sirén19-May-2002 19:39 GMT
Comment 133Leif19-May-2002 19:40 GMT
Comment 134Henning Nielsen Lund19-May-2002 19:47 GMT
Comment 135Janne Sirén19-May-2002 19:55 GMT
Comment 136Leif19-May-2002 19:59 GMT
Comment 137Darrin19-May-2002 19:59 GMT
Comment 138Darrin19-May-2002 20:00 GMT
Comment 139David Scheibler19-May-2002 20:01 GMT
Comment 140Anonymous19-May-2002 20:02 GMT
Comment 141Henning Nielsen Lund19-May-2002 20:03 GMT
Comment 142David Scheibler19-May-2002 20:06 GMT
Comment 143Janne Sirén19-May-2002 20:06 GMT
Comment 144Anonymous19-May-2002 20:07 GMT
Comment 145Alkis Tsapanidis19-May-2002 20:10 GMT
Comment 146Ole-Egil Hvitmyren19-May-2002 20:10 GMT
Comment 147Janne Sirén19-May-2002 20:17 GMT
Comment 148Darrin19-May-2002 20:17 GMT
Comment 149Henning Nielsen Lund19-May-2002 20:19 GMT
Comment 150Graham19-May-2002 20:24 GMT
Comment 151Hagge19-May-2002 20:26 GMT
Comment 152Hagge19-May-2002 20:43 GMT
Comment 153anarchic_teapot19-May-2002 20:46 GMT
Comment 154David Scheibler19-May-2002 20:58 GMT
Comment 155Joe "Floid" Kanowitz19-May-2002 21:05 GMT
Comment 156David Scheibler19-May-2002 21:07 GMT
Comment 157David Scheibler19-May-2002 21:09 GMT
Comment 158SteveW19-May-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 159Alex Klauke19-May-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 160David Scheibler19-May-2002 21:16 GMT
Comment 161cOrpse19-May-2002 21:17 GMT
Comment 162David Scheibler19-May-2002 21:19 GMT
Comment 163cOrpse19-May-2002 21:23 GMT
Comment 164Graham19-May-2002 21:27 GMT
Comment 165cOrpse19-May-2002 21:29 GMT
Comment 166Henning Nielsen Lund19-May-2002 21:29 GMT
Comment 167David Scheibler19-May-2002 21:30 GMT
Comment 168David Scheibler19-May-2002 21:33 GMT
Comment 169cOrpse19-May-2002 21:37 GMT
Comment 170cOrpse19-May-2002 21:39 GMT
Comment 171David Scheibler19-May-2002 21:43 GMT
Comment 172David Scheibler19-May-2002 21:45 GMT
Comment 173cOrpse19-May-2002 21:52 GMT
Comment 174Henning Nielsen Lund19-May-2002 21:52 GMT
Comment 175cOrpse19-May-2002 21:53 GMT
Comment 176Janne Sirén19-May-2002 21:56 GMT
Comment 177Anders Kjeldsen19-May-2002 21:58 GMT
Comment 178cOrpse19-May-2002 22:00 GMT
Comment 179Janne Sirén19-May-2002 22:11 GMT
Comment 180Graham19-May-2002 22:17 GMT
Comment 181Darrin19-May-2002 22:48 GMT
Comment 1823seas19-May-2002 22:49 GMT
Comment 1833seas19-May-2002 22:55 GMT
Comment 184Anonymous19-May-2002 23:10 GMT
Comment 185Anonymous19-May-2002 23:16 GMT
Comment 186Anonymous19-May-2002 23:18 GMT
Comment 187Anonymous19-May-2002 23:40 GMT
Comment 188DaveW20-May-2002 04:56 GMT
Comment 189priest20-May-2002 05:03 GMT
Comment 190priest20-May-2002 05:10 GMT
Comment 191anarchic_teapot20-May-2002 05:14 GMT
Comment 192DaveW20-May-2002 05:25 GMT
Comment 193priest20-May-2002 05:26 GMT
Comment 194cOrpse20-May-2002 05:28 GMT
Comment 195DaveW20-May-2002 05:42 GMT
Comment 196Kronos20-May-2002 05:45 GMT
Comment 197DaveW20-May-2002 05:46 GMT
Comment 198Anonymous20-May-2002 05:51 GMT
Comment 199DaveW20-May-2002 06:05 GMT
Comment 200Janne Sirén20-May-2002 06:30 GMT
Comment 201Henning Nielsen Lund20-May-2002 06:32 GMT
Comment 202Kay Are Ulvestad20-May-2002 07:03 GMT
Comment 203Kronos20-May-2002 07:06 GMT
Comment 204Janne Sirén20-May-2002 07:09 GMT
Comment 205Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 07:21 GMT
Comment 206Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 07:24 GMT
Comment 207Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 07:34 GMT
Comment 208Arno20-May-2002 07:53 GMT
Comment 209Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 08:12 GMT
Comment 210Ruediger Hanke20-May-2002 08:29 GMT
Comment 211Boy Genius20-May-2002 08:32 GMT
Comment 212Gabriele Greco20-May-2002 08:36 GMT
Comment 213Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 08:42 GMT
Comment 214Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 08:43 GMT
Comment 215Troels Ersking20-May-2002 08:49 GMT
Comment 216fleecy moss20-May-2002 09:14 GMT
Comment 217Anonymous20-May-2002 09:30 GMT
Comment 218Arno20-May-2002 09:30 GMT
Comment 219DaveW20-May-2002 09:33 GMT
Comment 220Alkis Tsapanidis20-May-2002 10:07 GMT
Comment 221Anonymous20-May-2002 10:07 GMT
Comment 222Kronos20-May-2002 10:11 GMT
Comment 223José20-May-2002 10:17 GMT
Comment 224priest20-May-2002 10:19 GMT
Comment 225Anonymous20-May-2002 10:19 GMT
Comment 226DaveW20-May-2002 10:25 GMT
Comment 227David Scheibler20-May-2002 10:25 GMT
Comment 228DaveW20-May-2002 10:36 GMT
Comment 229Graham20-May-2002 10:52 GMT
Comment 230anarchic_teapot20-May-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 231David Scheibler20-May-2002 10:57 GMT
Comment 232Kronos20-May-2002 11:01 GMT
Comment 233anarchic_teapot20-May-2002 11:07 GMT
Comment 234Alkis Tsapanidis20-May-2002 11:08 GMT
Comment 235Kronos20-May-2002 11:14 GMT
Comment 236Kay Are Ulvestad20-May-2002 11:18 GMT
Comment 237Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 11:18 GMT
Comment 238Alkis Tsapanidis20-May-2002 11:20 GMT
Comment 239Samface20-May-2002 11:23 GMT
Comment 240Kronos20-May-2002 11:27 GMT
Comment 241Kay Are Ulvestad20-May-2002 11:28 GMT
Comment 242Samface20-May-2002 11:39 GMT
Comment 243Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 11:42 GMT
Comment 244DaveW20-May-2002 11:42 GMT
Comment 245Kronos20-May-2002 11:45 GMT
Comment 246Alkis Tsapanidis20-May-2002 11:47 GMT
Comment 247Anonymous20-May-2002 11:47 GMT
Comment 248Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 11:49 GMT
Comment 249David Scheibler20-May-2002 11:57 GMT
Comment 250Alkis Tsapanidis20-May-2002 11:58 GMT
Comment 251Graham20-May-2002 11:58 GMT
Comment 252Graham20-May-2002 12:03 GMT
Comment 253David Scheibler20-May-2002 12:04 GMT
Comment 254Graham20-May-2002 12:05 GMT
Comment 255[JC]20-May-2002 12:11 GMT
Comment 256DaveW20-May-2002 12:12 GMT
Comment 257Samface20-May-2002 12:14 GMT
Comment 258Samface20-May-2002 12:18 GMT
Comment 259DaveW20-May-2002 12:19 GMT
Comment 260Samface20-May-2002 12:23 GMT
Comment 261Samface20-May-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 262David Scheibler20-May-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 263Adam Kowalczyk20-May-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 264Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 12:43 GMT
Comment 265Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 12:53 GMT
Comment 266priest20-May-2002 12:59 GMT
Comment 267Ole-Egil Hvitmyren20-May-2002 13:03 GMT
Comment 268Graham20-May-2002 13:05 GMT
Comment 269Kronos20-May-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 270fleecy moss20-May-2002 13:11 GMT
Comment 271Stevew20-May-2002 13:13 GMT
Comment 272fleecy moss20-May-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 273Alkis Tsapanidis20-May-2002 13:20 GMT
Comment 274fleecy moss20-May-2002 13:23 GMT
Comment 275Alkis Tsapanidis20-May-2002 13:23 GMT
Comment 276Kronos20-May-2002 13:25 GMT
Comment 277David Scheibler20-May-2002 13:26 GMT
Comment 278DanDude20-May-2002 13:30 GMT
Comment 279DaveW20-May-2002 13:32 GMT
Comment 280Rik Sweeney20-May-2002 13:33 GMT
Comment 281DaveW20-May-2002 13:34 GMT
Comment 282smithy20-May-2002 13:35 GMT
Comment 283DaveW20-May-2002 13:36 GMT
Comment 284Gabriele Greco20-May-2002 13:38 GMT
Comment 285smithy20-May-2002 13:38 GMT
Comment 286fleecy20-May-2002 13:40 GMT
Comment 287[JC]20-May-2002 13:40 GMT
Comment 288Kronos20-May-2002 13:40 GMT
Comment 289smithy20-May-2002 13:41 GMT
Comment 290DaveW20-May-2002 13:43 GMT
Comment 291Christophe Decanini20-May-2002 13:46 GMT
Comment 292smithy20-May-2002 13:46 GMT
Comment 293Christophe Decanini20-May-2002 13:48 GMT
Comment 294Amifan20-May-2002 13:50 GMT
Comment 295Alkis Alexandros Tsapanidis ;)20-May-2002 13:50 GMT
Comment 296fleecy20-May-2002 13:52 GMT
Comment 297fleecy20-May-2002 13:57 GMT
Comment 298Anonymous20-May-2002 13:58 GMT
Comment 299Alkis Tsapanidis20-May-2002 13:59 GMT
Comment 300Anonymous20-May-2002 14:00 GMT
Comment 301furry thing20-May-2002 14:18 GMT
Comment 302anon20-May-2002 14:20 GMT
Comment 303Eva20-May-2002 14:28 GMT
Comment 304Eva20-May-2002 14:31 GMT
Comment 305Eva20-May-2002 14:33 GMT
Comment 306David Scheibler20-May-2002 14:53 GMT
Comment 307Georg Steger20-May-2002 14:53 GMT
Comment 308Georg Steger20-May-2002 14:56 GMT
Comment 309Georg Steger20-May-2002 14:59 GMT
Comment 310Jensdensen20-May-2002 15:16 GMT
Comment 311anarchic_teapot20-May-2002 15:40 GMT
Comment 312anarchic_teapot20-May-2002 15:47 GMT
Comment 313Alex Klauke20-May-2002 15:55 GMT
Comment 314Kronos20-May-2002 16:00 GMT
Comment 315Kronos20-May-2002 16:08 GMT
Comment 316Stefan Burström20-May-2002 16:09 GMT
Comment 317anarchic_teapot20-May-2002 16:10 GMT
Comment 318amiraoul20-May-2002 16:18 GMT
Comment 319Anonymous20-May-2002 16:26 GMT
Comment 320Anonymous20-May-2002 16:43 GMT
Comment 321Anonymous20-May-2002 16:45 GMT
Comment 322Anonymous20-May-2002 16:46 GMT
Comment 323Ole-Egil20-May-2002 16:46 GMT
Comment 324Anonymous20-May-2002 16:50 GMT
Comment 325Anonymous20-May-2002 16:59 GMT
Comment 326Christophe Decanini20-May-2002 17:18 GMT
Comment 327Ole-Egil20-May-2002 17:19 GMT
Comment 328Christophe Decanini20-May-2002 18:03 GMT
Comment 329Darrin20-May-2002 19:01 GMT
Comment 330Joe "Floid" Kanowitz20-May-2002 19:20 GMT
Comment 331David Scheibler20-May-2002 19:36 GMT
Comment 332Raffaele20-May-2002 19:45 GMT
Comment 333Quenthal20-May-2002 20:56 GMT
Comment 334EXtor20-May-2002 21:01 GMT
Comment 335Neil Thomas20-May-2002 21:17 GMT
Comment 336Bob Githam20-May-2002 21:18 GMT
Comment 337Joe "Floid" Kanowitz20-May-2002 21:38 GMT
Comment 338Anonymous20-May-2002 21:59 GMT
Comment 339Tomas20-May-2002 23:20 GMT
Comment 340SatanOnAmiga21-May-2002 01:33 GMT
Comment 341Anonymous21-May-2002 03:38 GMT
Comment 342DaveW21-May-2002 04:28 GMT
Comment 343Rodney21-May-2002 06:32 GMT
Comment 344Amifan21-May-2002 09:34 GMT
Comment 345Nowee21-May-2002 09:53 GMT
Comment 346DaveW21-May-2002 10:31 GMT
Comment 347DanDude21-May-2002 10:52 GMT
Comment 348anon21-May-2002 11:20 GMT
Comment 349Kronos21-May-2002 12:00 GMT
Comment 350Anonymous21-May-2002 16:24 GMT
Comment 351Staf Verhaegen21-May-2002 17:15 GMT
Comment 352Kronos21-May-2002 17:26 GMT
Comment 353Nowee21-May-2002 20:12 GMT
Comment 354Darron Cox21-May-2002 23:56 GMT
Comment 355Boy Genius22-May-2002 06:39 GMT
Comment 356Amifan23-May-2002 07:13 GMT
Comment 357dsafsdfasd24-May-2002 11:44 GMT
Comment 358Patrice26-May-2002 18:42 GMT
Comment 359c. wanvig06-Jun-2002 21:34 GMT
Back to Top