29-Mar-2024 13:37 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Pegasos presentation in 'neues' cancelled!ANN.lu
Posted on 21-May-2002 18:00 GMT by Christophe Decanini179 comments
View flat
View list
From MorphOS News.
The Pegasos presentation in 'neues' has been cancelled. An official statement will follow.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini21-May-2002 16:04 GMT
Comment 2cOrpse21-May-2002 16:09 GMT
Comment 3redfox21-May-2002 16:20 GMT
Comment 4redrumloa21-May-2002 17:04 GMT
Comment 5redrumloa21-May-2002 17:06 GMT
Comment 6DaveWGagged21-May-2002 17:10 GMT
Comment 7cOrpse21-May-2002 17:13 GMT
Comment 8Akaru21-May-2002 17:32 GMT
Comment 9Amifan21-May-2002 18:01 GMT
Comment 10Kronos21-May-2002 18:05 GMT
Comment 11Amifan21-May-2002 18:11 GMT
Comment 12Raffaele21-May-2002 18:12 GMT
Comment 13Rik Sweeney21-May-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 14Rik Sweeney21-May-2002 18:59 GMT
Comment 15cOrpse21-May-2002 19:04 GMT
Comment 16Amifan21-May-2002 19:05 GMT
Comment 17Jon21-May-2002 19:09 GMT
Comment 18Con21-May-2002 20:17 GMT
Comment 19smithy21-May-2002 20:43 GMT
Comment 20Bandaren21-May-2002 21:57 GMT
Comment 21Darrin21-May-2002 23:35 GMT
Comment 22Christophe Decanini21-May-2002 23:46 GMT
Comment 23Darrin22-May-2002 01:38 GMT
Comment 24Johan Rönnblom22-May-2002 04:52 GMT
Comment 25Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 06:06 GMT
Comment 26Raffaele22-May-2002 06:34 GMT
Comment 27Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 06:44 GMT
Comment 28Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 06:45 GMT
Comment 29Neko22-May-2002 06:47 GMT
Comment 30Phill22-May-2002 06:55 GMT
Comment 31Rik Sweeney22-May-2002 07:05 GMT
Comment 32Rik Sweeney22-May-2002 07:12 GMT
Comment 33Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 07:14 GMT
Comment 34Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 07:18 GMT
Comment 35John Timor22-May-2002 07:22 GMT
Comment 36Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 07:26 GMT
Comment 37Rik Sweeney22-May-2002 07:26 GMT
Comment 38Rik Sweeney22-May-2002 07:35 GMT
Comment 39Robert22-May-2002 07:36 GMT
Comment 40Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 07:36 GMT
Comment 41Gabriele Greco22-May-2002 07:38 GMT
Comment 42anarchic_teapot22-May-2002 07:42 GMT
Comment 43Kay Are Ulvestad22-May-2002 07:48 GMT
Comment 44Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 07:48 GMT
Comment 45Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 07:52 GMT
Comment 46Robert22-May-2002 08:03 GMT
Comment 47Casey R Williams22-May-2002 08:03 GMT
Comment 48Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 08:04 GMT
Comment 49Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 08:06 GMT
Comment 50gz22-May-2002 08:08 GMT
Comment 51Robert22-May-2002 08:24 GMT
Comment 52John Timor22-May-2002 08:25 GMT
Comment 53Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 08:28 GMT
Comment 54Amon_Re22-May-2002 08:51 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous22-May-2002 08:52 GMT
Comment 56Kay Are Ulvestad22-May-2002 08:53 GMT
Comment 57Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 08:54 GMT
Comment 58unimportant22-May-2002 08:55 GMT
Comment 59Amon_Re22-May-2002 08:56 GMT
Comment 60o1i22-May-2002 08:59 GMT
Comment 61Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 09:06 GMT
Comment 62Robert22-May-2002 09:13 GMT
Comment 63Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 09:19 GMT
Comment 64Amon_Re22-May-2002 09:22 GMT
Comment 65priest22-May-2002 09:24 GMT
Comment 66Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 09:25 GMT
Comment 67Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 09:27 GMT
Comment 68Robert22-May-2002 09:27 GMT
Comment 69Amon_Re22-May-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 70Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 09:36 GMT
Comment 71Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 09:37 GMT
Comment 72Amon_Re22-May-2002 09:38 GMT
Comment 73Amon_Re22-May-2002 09:40 GMT
Comment 74o1i22-May-2002 09:44 GMT
Comment 75Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 09:49 GMT
Comment 76Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 09:51 GMT
Comment 77Amon_Re22-May-2002 09:58 GMT
Comment 78Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 10:06 GMT
Comment 79Amon_Re22-May-2002 10:08 GMT
Comment 80Jon22-May-2002 10:21 GMT
Comment 81Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 10:31 GMT
Comment 82u22-May-2002 10:32 GMT
Comment 83Peter Gordon22-May-2002 10:38 GMT
Comment 84Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 10:45 GMT
Comment 85Robert22-May-2002 10:46 GMT
Comment 86Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 11:04 GMT
Comment 87Kay Are Ulvestad22-May-2002 11:06 GMT
Comment 88Peter Gordon22-May-2002 11:12 GMT
Comment 89Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 11:12 GMT
Comment 90Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 11:18 GMT
Comment 91anon22-May-2002 11:20 GMT
Comment 92Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 11:21 GMT
Comment 93Anonymous22-May-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 94Anonymous22-May-2002 11:37 GMT
Comment 95Anonymous22-May-2002 11:46 GMT
Comment 96Eva22-May-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 97Eva22-May-2002 11:50 GMT
Comment 98mrtickle@amiga4k.ndo.co.uk22-May-2002 11:52 GMT
Comment 99Anonymous22-May-2002 11:54 GMT
Comment 100Eva22-May-2002 11:55 GMT
Comment 101Amon_Re22-May-2002 12:03 GMT
Comment 102Eva22-May-2002 12:07 GMT
Comment 103Eva22-May-2002 12:12 GMT
Comment 104Peter Gordon22-May-2002 12:16 GMT
Comment 105Leki22-May-2002 12:19 GMT
Comment 106Eva22-May-2002 12:21 GMT
Comment 107Amon_Re22-May-2002 12:33 GMT
Comment 108Peter Gordon22-May-2002 12:38 GMT
Comment 109eXolon22-May-2002 13:02 GMT
Comment 110Sergio22-May-2002 13:25 GMT
Comment 111pixie22-May-2002 13:32 GMT
Comment 112Henning Nielsen Lund22-May-2002 13:41 GMT
Comment 113anon22-May-2002 13:43 GMT
Comment 114Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 13:44 GMT
Comment 115Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 13:52 GMT
Comment 116Anonymous22-May-2002 14:10 GMT
Comment 117Bladerunner22-May-2002 14:23 GMT
Comment 118pixie22-May-2002 14:40 GMT
Comment 119Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 14:43 GMT
Comment 120Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 14:45 GMT
Comment 121cheesegrate22-May-2002 14:45 GMT
Comment 122Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 14:45 GMT
Comment 123Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 15:02 GMT
Comment 124Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 15:06 GMT
Comment 125Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 15:13 GMT
Comment 126Henning Nielsen Lund22-May-2002 15:20 GMT
Comment 127Kay Are Ulvestad22-May-2002 15:25 GMT
Comment 128Christophe Decanini22-May-2002 16:18 GMT
Comment 129Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 16:21 GMT
Comment 130Anonymous22-May-2002 16:23 GMT
Comment 131Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 16:29 GMT
Comment 132Henning Nielsen Lund22-May-2002 16:30 GMT
Comment 133Remco Komduur22-May-2002 16:32 GMT
Comment 134Ole-Egil Hvitmyren22-May-2002 16:36 GMT
Comment 135Henning Nielsen Lund22-May-2002 16:38 GMT
Comment 136Christophe Decanini22-May-2002 16:44 GMT
Comment 137Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 17:47 GMT
Comment 138Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 17:54 GMT
Comment 139Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 18:04 GMT
Comment 140Christophe Decanini22-May-2002 18:20 GMT
Comment 141Anders Kjeldsen22-May-2002 18:31 GMT
Comment 142Henning Nielsen Lund22-May-2002 18:37 GMT
Comment 143Johan Rönnblom22-May-2002 20:46 GMT
Comment 144cheesegrate22-May-2002 22:03 GMT
Comment 145Yeee Haaa22-May-2002 23:02 GMT
Comment 146cheesegrate23-May-2002 00:46 GMT
Comment 147Leki23-May-2002 05:34 GMT
Comment 148Kay Are Ulvestad23-May-2002 06:16 GMT
Comment 149Amifan23-May-2002 06:57 GMT
Comment 150Amifan23-May-2002 07:01 GMT
Comment 151Amifan23-May-2002 07:03 GMT
Comment 152cheesegrate23-May-2002 07:23 GMT
Comment 153Braver23-May-2002 08:19 GMT
Comment 154Andrea23-May-2002 08:27 GMT
Comment 155Björn Hagström23-May-2002 08:52 GMT
Comment 156Kay Are Ulvestad23-May-2002 08:59 GMT
Comment 157Henning Nielsen Lund23-May-2002 09:04 GMT
Comment 158Björn Hagström23-May-2002 09:15 GMT
Comment 159priest23-May-2002 09:50 GMT
Comment 160Braver23-May-2002 10:35 GMT
Comment 161Arno23-May-2002 11:18 GMT
Comment 162Anders Kjeldsen23-May-2002 11:31 GMT
Comment 163Anonymous23-May-2002 11:33 GMT
Comment 164Anonymous23-May-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 165Kay Are Ulvestad23-May-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 166Alkis Tsapanidis23-May-2002 13:16 GMT
Comment 167Kay Are Ulvestad23-May-2002 13:25 GMT
Comment 168Alkis Tsapanidis23-May-2002 15:59 GMT
Comment 169justice23-May-2002 16:04 GMT
Comment 170Kay Are Ulvestad23-May-2002 16:13 GMT
Comment 171Anonymous23-May-2002 16:31 GMT
Pegasos presentation in 'neues' cancelled! : Comment 172 of 179ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 23-May-2002 16:52 GMT
In reply to Comment 165 (Kay Are Ulvestad):
>Until something is proven, I'll consider BOTH parties to be innocent. Work
>with that sentence for a while before you reply.
There is no need to try and extrapolate my patterns of behaviour from a reply of less than two lines and one with a clear dose of apparent sarcasm. It may have been a dry reply on my part, but no disrespect was intended.
I do not claim Amiga Inc.'s claims are not justified, but they do have the burden of proof and so far they have only made claims in public without attempting to do so. This may be a legal strategy of theirs, but nonetheless they are using the public forum to cast doubt on bPlan without providing any compelling evidence or proceeding with appropriate legal action.
They are passing judgement already and with them a whole lot of people, many without knowning any facts of the case. I can understand why Amiga Inc. are doing this, and if their claim is justified I do hope they win in court, but the assumption of innocence has been long forgotten on bPlan's part by a lot of people here - and this mostly because of what Amiga Inc. has said without providing proof.
Again, perhaps a legal strategy, but the public backlash is the other side of the coin.
Amiga Inc. may be doing it in good faith and their case may be justified, I do agree with you there, and I agree that your basic principle - in the form that you wrote it open in your reply to me - is quite noble indeed. However, I believe Amiga Inc. are wrong in discussing this in public (generating FUD) and without legal action. They should settle it in court or at least make their evidence public. Now they are just spreading innuendo and threats.
This is something I believe they can be criticized of. They can't eat the cake and keep it. This may be a good legal strategy, but it is harmful for bPlan's business efforts without having to rely on any proof at this time. That I can, and do, have a problem with no matter how right they may be in the end.
Ends really don't justify the means.
Jump...
#174 Kay Are Ulvestad
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 173Henning Nielsen Lund23-May-2002 17:09 GMT
Comment 174Kay Are Ulvestad23-May-2002 17:17 GMT
Comment 175Henning Nielsen Lund23-May-2002 17:17 GMT
Comment 176Anonymous23-May-2002 17:37 GMT
Comment 177Henning Nielsen Lund23-May-2002 17:48 GMT
Comment 178Anders Kjeldsen23-May-2002 19:09 GMT
Comment 179Anders Kjeldsen23-May-2002 19:11 GMT
Back to Top