20-Apr-2024 03:02 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] "Amiga still better than PC" articleANN.lu
Posted on 22-May-2002 17:33 GMT by Colin Wilson24 comments
View flat
View list
The Inquirer tech news site has an article here that you may find entertaining.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini22-May-2002 16:19 GMT
Comment 2darklite22-May-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 3cOrpse22-May-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 4PaulT22-May-2002 20:39 GMT
Comment 54pLaY22-May-2002 20:46 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous22-May-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 7Robert Goodlett22-May-2002 23:53 GMT
Comment 8sc23-May-2002 01:31 GMT
Comment 9Joe "Floid" Kanowitz23-May-2002 04:16 GMT
Comment 10Akaru23-May-2002 05:13 GMT
Comment 11Chip23-May-2002 05:55 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous23-May-2002 07:20 GMT
Comment 13Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 08:31 GMT
"Amiga still better than PC" article : Comment 14 of 24ANN.lu
Posted by kjetil on 23-May-2002 08:59 GMT
In reply to Comment 13 (Ole-Egil Hvitmyren):
Well there are tow options that springs to my mind, about mounting the samba,
You may use Lisa for KDE2.0, it’s LAN browser, samba, ftp,
all in one KDE file system, with out mounting the samba file system.
The 2en option is the LinNeighbourhood, samba mount tool for X11,
I believe /etc/fstab is open for read access as default, the user, group and guest,
So putting the passwords in fstab is not so good ide, if you allow users to logon with Telnet
--
To stay in the category samba in general not just Linux, I most say
Smbfs on Amiga is allot better to deal with the Linux version, the only problem with unmounting it is that you need to do shell break command on the smbfs program.
Even so, the smbfs on amiga steel need to be mounted in equivalent way as the Linux version of smbmount, no browsing the network option.
Jump...
#15 Ole-Egil Hvitmyren
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 15Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 09:11 GMT
Comment 16Joe "Floid" Kanowitz23-May-2002 09:16 GMT
Comment 17kjetil23-May-2002 09:41 GMT
Comment 18Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 09:42 GMT
Comment 19darklite23-May-2002 12:21 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous23-May-2002 12:34 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous23-May-2002 12:50 GMT
Comment 22MIKE23-May-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous24-May-2002 06:40 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous24-May-2002 08:41 GMT
Back to Top