20-Apr-2024 02:01 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] "Amiga still better than PC" articleANN.lu
Posted on 22-May-2002 17:33 GMT by Colin Wilson24 comments
View flat
View list
The Inquirer tech news site has an article here that you may find entertaining.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini22-May-2002 16:19 GMT
Comment 2darklite22-May-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 3cOrpse22-May-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 4PaulT22-May-2002 20:39 GMT
Comment 54pLaY22-May-2002 20:46 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous22-May-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 7Robert Goodlett22-May-2002 23:53 GMT
Comment 8sc23-May-2002 01:31 GMT
Comment 9Joe "Floid" Kanowitz23-May-2002 04:16 GMT
Comment 10Akaru23-May-2002 05:13 GMT
Comment 11Chip23-May-2002 05:55 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous23-May-2002 07:20 GMT
Comment 13Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 08:31 GMT
Comment 14kjetil23-May-2002 08:59 GMT
Comment 15Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 09:11 GMT
"Amiga still better than PC" article : Comment 16 of 24ANN.lu
Posted by Joe "Floid" Kanowitz on 23-May-2002 09:16 GMT
In reply to Comment 13 (Ole-Egil Hvitmyren):
Ole: The problem is that Samba, by design, is overkill for 'desktop' use; it was designed with the intent of taking over for NT 'domain' servers. If you were to use a standard like NFS locally (which itself can be a bit overkill), you'd have less fiddly trouble overall.
Technically, anyone can take the Samba code and make a more managable solution, but few have. (There's a pretty simple Samba-based browser out there that's been merged into Lycoris and Lindows as their "Network Neighborhood" replacement, but it's still a bit bulky.) FreeBSD really bit the bullet, and some Kazakhi(!!) hackers did it right- you can now "mount_smbfs" like any other filesystem, though there's no associated server daemon as of yet. (Linux has some unrelated smbfs modules, but rumor has that it isn't well-maintained. I haven't looked into it, as I'm still hopeless with Linux kernel manipulation.)
This isn't to say *NIX-like systems don't have their flaws (they've got tons, especially in the usability department), but I'm just nitpicking that Samba is a bad example. It's like complaining that IE-for-Windows plugins don't work in Voyager/iBrowse/Mozilla/Onmiweb.
Does OS3.9 have an easy-to-use CIFS requester included that I don't know about?
--
Ranty footnote:
I have to wonder what may become of some of these alternative CIFS projects after Microsoft weaseled anti-GPL provisions into the license for their (court-ordered) opening of the protocol specs. If a Samba developer can be 'tainted' by looking at BSD code (or comments therein) derived from MS's references, that's a pretty severe dilution of the free-to-all-comers BSD license. Still, this has been hashed over elsewhere, and the Samba team feels they're in the clear/are willing to take it to court if it ever comes down to it.
Jump...
#18 Ole-Egil Hvitmyren
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 17kjetil23-May-2002 09:41 GMT
Comment 18Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 09:42 GMT
Comment 19darklite23-May-2002 12:21 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous23-May-2002 12:34 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous23-May-2002 12:50 GMT
Comment 22MIKE23-May-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous24-May-2002 06:40 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous24-May-2002 08:41 GMT
Back to Top