23-Apr-2024 14:14 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] "Amiga still better than PC" articleANN.lu
Posted on 22-May-2002 17:33 GMT by Colin Wilson24 comments
View flat
View list
The Inquirer tech news site has an article here that you may find entertaining.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini22-May-2002 16:19 GMT
Comment 2darklite22-May-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 3cOrpse22-May-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 4PaulT22-May-2002 20:39 GMT
Comment 54pLaY22-May-2002 20:46 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous22-May-2002 21:10 GMT
"Amiga still better than PC" article : Comment 7 of 24ANN.lu
Posted by Robert Goodlett on 22-May-2002 23:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 6 (Anonymous):
> AmigaDE doesn't and can't offer what he asks for because it is hosted. So it has
>no way to make latency guarantees (needed for a proper media system) and no way to
>provide instant-on because it must wait for the host to boot before it can even be
>started.
To be technically correct DE can run self-hosted. It was decided for now that DE be hosted on Desktop Computers but this is not etched in stone. My understanding behind DE needing hosting on desktops is due to memmory protection not being part of DE at this time.
You forget or do not know that DE and AmigaOS are supposed to merge later. When this happens computers should be fast enough for DE to have memmory protection and still be usefull. I personally think this is what OS5 is going to be.
I do not speak for or against Amiga Inc but I did add some to their new trademark phrase. :-)
Amiga Anywhere, Anytime, Anyplace. <-- So many people still fail to get this part.
Hardware will not matter. There is still work to do to get there but DE is supposed to scale. Don't be so narrow minded to think that just because DE is where it is at now that it is supposed to stagnate at this point in time.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 8sc23-May-2002 01:31 GMT
Comment 9Joe "Floid" Kanowitz23-May-2002 04:16 GMT
Comment 10Akaru23-May-2002 05:13 GMT
Comment 11Chip23-May-2002 05:55 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous23-May-2002 07:20 GMT
Comment 13Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 08:31 GMT
Comment 14kjetil23-May-2002 08:59 GMT
Comment 15Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 09:11 GMT
Comment 16Joe "Floid" Kanowitz23-May-2002 09:16 GMT
Comment 17kjetil23-May-2002 09:41 GMT
Comment 18Ole-Egil Hvitmyren23-May-2002 09:42 GMT
Comment 19darklite23-May-2002 12:21 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous23-May-2002 12:34 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous23-May-2002 12:50 GMT
Comment 22MIKE23-May-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous24-May-2002 06:40 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous24-May-2002 08:41 GMT
Back to Top