24-Apr-2024 09:10 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] The AmigaOne in Leeuwarden (photos)ANN.lu
Posted on 25-May-2002 17:32 GMT by petros1815122 comments
View flat
View list
The AmigaOne was presented in Leeuwarden today. Unfortunately, only openfirmware bios was shown. Photos of the presentation at http://www.amigascene.nl/nieuws/nieuws.htm . At around 15.00 Computer City brought the AmigaOne motherboard. It is the first sample of the 1.0a board. Because the motherboard was different from the one that Eyetech had, it was not possible to use the Linux from the old board. Because there was no more time for a new installation, we had to do only with the openfirmware bios. There are installed a IBM processor (without cooling!), 128MB, Soundblaster soundcard and a ATi Radeon 7500 AGP. It now waits for OS4.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Joe "Floid" Kanowitz25-May-2002 15:47 GMT
Comment 2Arno25-May-2002 15:51 GMT
Comment 3anonymous coder25-May-2002 16:01 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous25-May-2002 16:19 GMT
Comment 5Amifan25-May-2002 16:22 GMT
Comment 6Ole-Egil Hvitmyren25-May-2002 17:01 GMT
Comment 7Joe "Floid" Kanowitz25-May-2002 18:03 GMT
Comment 8Kronos25-May-2002 18:07 GMT
Comment 9Ole-Egil Hvitmyren25-May-2002 18:45 GMT
Comment 10Roald Oosterhoff25-May-2002 20:26 GMT
Comment 11cOrpse25-May-2002 20:42 GMT
Comment 12Joe "Floid" Kanowitz25-May-2002 21:19 GMT
Comment 13Joe "Floid" Kanowitz25-May-2002 21:35 GMT
Comment 14Simon26-May-2002 00:38 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous26-May-2002 00:48 GMT
Comment 16Simon26-May-2002 00:54 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous26-May-2002 01:29 GMT
Comment 18Simon26-May-2002 02:08 GMT
Comment 19Ole-Egil26-May-2002 04:08 GMT
Comment 20Henning Nielsen Lund26-May-2002 08:19 GMT
Comment 21Simon26-May-2002 08:43 GMT
Comment 22Alcom26-May-2002 08:47 GMT
Comment 23Henning Nielsen Lund26-May-2002 09:06 GMT
Comment 24Tron26-May-2002 09:07 GMT
Comment 25Tron26-May-2002 09:15 GMT
Comment 26Turrican26-May-2002 09:16 GMT
Comment 27Ben Hermans/Hyperion26-May-2002 09:32 GMT
Comment 28DaveW26-May-2002 09:39 GMT
Comment 29Eva26-May-2002 10:00 GMT
Comment 30DaveW26-May-2002 10:09 GMT
Comment 31Alkemyst26-May-2002 10:20 GMT
Comment 32Joe "Floid" Kanowitz26-May-2002 10:38 GMT
Comment 33Ole-Egil Hvitmyren26-May-2002 10:40 GMT
Comment 34MIB26-May-2002 10:53 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous26-May-2002 10:57 GMT
Comment 36DaveW26-May-2002 11:39 GMT
Comment 37Ole-Egil Hvitmyren26-May-2002 12:04 GMT
Comment 38DaveW26-May-2002 12:32 GMT
Comment 39Ole-Egil Hvitmyren26-May-2002 12:49 GMT
Comment 40a26-May-2002 13:01 GMT
Comment 41KenH26-May-2002 13:43 GMT
Comment 42KenH26-May-2002 13:47 GMT
Comment 43anonymous coder26-May-2002 13:57 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous26-May-2002 13:58 GMT
Comment 45Matthew Garrett26-May-2002 14:10 GMT
Comment 46a26-May-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 47a26-May-2002 14:19 GMT
Comment 48Atheisht Schmatheisht26-May-2002 14:36 GMT
Comment 49Atheisht Schmatheisht26-May-2002 14:37 GMT
Comment 50DaveW26-May-2002 15:02 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous26-May-2002 15:10 GMT
Comment 52Ole-Egil26-May-2002 15:11 GMT
Comment 53Turrican26-May-2002 15:15 GMT
Comment 54DaveW26-May-2002 15:45 GMT
Comment 55Patrick26-May-2002 15:56 GMT
Comment 56SlimJim26-May-2002 15:59 GMT
Comment 57anonymous26-May-2002 16:17 GMT
Comment 58Ole-Egil Hvitmyren26-May-2002 16:21 GMT
Comment 59DaveW26-May-2002 18:30 GMT
Comment 60Ole-Egil Hvitmyren26-May-2002 18:35 GMT
Comment 61DaveW26-May-2002 18:38 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous26-May-2002 18:40 GMT
Comment 63Ole-Egil Hvitmyren26-May-2002 18:53 GMT
Comment 64anarchic_teapot26-May-2002 19:23 GMT
Comment 65KenH26-May-2002 20:30 GMT
Comment 66KenH26-May-2002 20:35 GMT
Comment 67Anonymous26-May-2002 21:21 GMT
Comment 68Aram Iskenderian26-May-2002 21:32 GMT
Comment 69Aram Iskenderian26-May-2002 21:42 GMT
Comment 70Stefan Burström26-May-2002 22:34 GMT
Comment 71Joe "Floid" Kanowitz26-May-2002 23:13 GMT
Comment 72anonymous27-May-2002 01:18 GMT
Comment 73anonymous coder27-May-2002 03:50 GMT
Comment 74Ole-Egil Hvitmyren27-May-2002 06:50 GMT
Comment 75EmGee27-May-2002 07:29 GMT
Comment 76Julian Cassin27-May-2002 07:35 GMT
Comment 77Ole-Egil Hvitmyren27-May-2002 07:45 GMT
Comment 78Julian Cassin27-May-2002 08:09 GMT
Comment 79Julian Cassin27-May-2002 08:21 GMT
Comment 80Graham27-May-2002 09:12 GMT
Comment 81Ole-Egil Hvitmyren27-May-2002 10:27 GMT
Comment 82Anonymous27-May-2002 10:51 GMT
Comment 83Graham27-May-2002 11:13 GMT
Comment 84Simon27-May-2002 11:14 GMT
Comment 85Anonymous27-May-2002 11:16 GMT
Comment 86Ole-Egil Hvitmyren27-May-2002 11:32 GMT
Comment 87Julian Cassin27-May-2002 12:03 GMT
Comment 88Julian Cassin27-May-2002 12:07 GMT
Comment 89Julian Cassin27-May-2002 12:10 GMT
Comment 90comankh27-May-2002 12:14 GMT
Comment 91Simon27-May-2002 12:16 GMT
Comment 92amigammc27-May-2002 12:58 GMT
Comment 93GUI Freak27-May-2002 13:09 GMT
Comment 94Adam Kowalczyk27-May-2002 13:12 GMT
Comment 95Christian27-May-2002 13:29 GMT
The AmigaOne in Leeuwarden (photos) : Comment 96 of 122ANN.lu
Posted by Simon on 27-May-2002 13:29 GMT
In reply to Comment 93 (GUI Freak):
>Tweaking
>can be fun, but it should also be somewhat accessable
>to the unwashed masses
No!!! It should not, because they'll fuck up their machines!
>The Amiga OS will always be doomed
>to remain a hobby OS
Yes. It will. The AmigaOne is NOT going to change this no matter how optimistic you are.
> NORMAL computer users are very intimidated by the
>ugly, unfriendly user interface of the Pee Cee without
>it's Windows[dressing].
Good, if they are intimidated then they shouldn't mess with it. Besides no one FORCES a user to enter the BIOS. I am SURE that the AmigaOne systems will come with the BIOS all set and ready to go, may god strike may down if it not be so.
>Trying
>to save time isn't a very good
Absolute bullshit. Way, way, way too much time has been wasted. WAY too much. Spending more time making the BIOS look nice for a few people who apparently aren't intelligent enough to configure it is .... take a guess...
>We need regular people
>to start using the Amiga again,
If you mean winning back PC users (like me). Well, a nice BIOS won't win me back. But OS4 might, I really, really miss my old miggy.
> People have to get out of this mindset that power is
>everything.
If I want to play fullscreen divX movies, MP3's and browse the web then power is important.
>Usability should be just as important on
>the new Amiga OS
It is. What does the OS have to do with the BIOS? When I go into BIOS on my PC I don't see windows XP. I see a text screen, are you saying that windows XP should be in ROM so that the one or two times in this computers life that I need to access the BIOS I can have it look like my OS??
>cludgy, half-baked
>BIOS screens
?!??! It's a BIOS screen!!! Get over it! it a fucking BIOS screen that most users will NEVER have to see.
>won't cut it in the marketplace anymore
If the marketplace is people like YOU than nothing but a brand new designed-from-scratch supercomputer with a very cool looking BIOS wont cut it.
>Ever
>wondered why most PC users (who have a clue, at any rate)
>seem to spend so much time cursing M$?!
Because they don't have an Amiga to curse???
God speed OS4 and the AmigaOne. There might be some hope left.
Jump...
#100 GUI Freak
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 97Graham27-May-2002 13:29 GMT
Comment 98Ole-Egil Hvitmyren27-May-2002 13:45 GMT
Comment 99Simon27-May-2002 13:57 GMT
Comment 100GUI Freak27-May-2002 14:49 GMT
Comment 101Graham27-May-2002 14:56 GMT
Comment 102Ole-Egil Hvitmyren27-May-2002 15:03 GMT
Comment 103Anonymous27-May-2002 15:12 GMT
Comment 104Henning Nielsen Lund27-May-2002 17:38 GMT
Comment 105amigammc27-May-2002 21:06 GMT
Comment 106Julian Cassin27-May-2002 22:07 GMT
Comment 107Bert Dorhout27-May-2002 22:29 GMT
Comment 108Ole-Egil Hvitmyren28-May-2002 06:33 GMT
Comment 109Solar28-May-2002 10:57 GMT
Comment 110Joe "Floid" Kanowitz28-May-2002 11:17 GMT
Comment 111Solar28-May-2002 11:35 GMT
Comment 112priest28-May-2002 11:59 GMT
Comment 113priest28-May-2002 12:01 GMT
Comment 114Jon28-May-2002 18:23 GMT
Comment 115Solar29-May-2002 04:07 GMT
Comment 116Julian Cassin29-May-2002 07:31 GMT
Comment 117Julian Cassin29-May-2002 07:33 GMT
Comment 118Samface29-May-2002 07:39 GMT
Comment 119Samface29-May-2002 07:46 GMT
Comment 120Solar29-May-2002 11:51 GMT
Comment 121hgm29-May-2002 21:11 GMT
Comment 122Ole-Egil Hvitmyren30-May-2002 05:07 GMT
Back to Top