06-Oct-2024 22:09 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] AmigaAnywhere isn't AmigaDE ?ANN.lu
Posted on 01-Jun-2002 16:36 GMT by NoBeForMe16 comments
View flat
View list
The AmigaAnywhere pack apparently can't run AmigaDE content. People who spent $30 or more on the "Entertainment Pack" can only run the four games included with that pack. They also can't run those games from a non PocketPC system.

Amiga Inc says that it intends to eventually write a Player application for PocketPC, and then PocketPC owners will be able to buy this additional software (the desktop equivalent costs $20) on top of the Entertainment Pack and any extra games. The Entertainment Pack itself remains a "sealed unit". There is as yet no ETA or price information for the PocketPC Player.

What do developers think of this? Were you expecting to generate sales based on AA Entertainment Pack purchases, or did Amiga warn you that PocketPC owners wouldn't be able to buy your games ?

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Marcus Sundman01-Jun-2002 14:44 GMT
Comment 2Don Cox01-Jun-2002 15:18 GMT
Comment 3Ben01-Jun-2002 18:50 GMT
Comment 4KenH01-Jun-2002 20:13 GMT
AmigaAnywhere isn't AmigaDE ? : Comment 5 of 16ANN.lu
Posted by Joe "Floid" Kanowitz on 01-Jun-2002 21:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (Marcus Sundman):
I'm with Marcus- anyone have 'evidence?' Is this common knowledge on the AmiOpen list (which I really should resubscribe to, heh)...? It does still run on all 3 WinCE architectures, I hope?
I don't think Bill said anything outright in the TechTV interview, but as the game pack looked like it shared the Player's UI*, it seemed like it was going to be able to take .AMIs.
*That /was/ a Player window and not a WinCE directory view, right?
Jump...
#6 tlosm
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 6tlosm01-Jun-2002 22:36 GMT
Comment 7Nicolas Mendoza01-Jun-2002 23:16 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous01-Jun-2002 23:19 GMT
Comment 9twiceaday02-Jun-2002 00:48 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous02-Jun-2002 21:20 GMT
Comment 11NihilVor03-Jun-2002 01:10 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous03-Jun-2002 02:06 GMT
Comment 13gary_c03-Jun-2002 06:03 GMT
Comment 14blah blah03-Jun-2002 07:44 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous03-Jun-2002 07:46 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous03-Jun-2002 23:07 GMT
Back to Top