18-Apr-2024 23:15 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Next Pegasos production sold outANN.lu
Posted on 07-Jun-2002 18:19 GMT by Christian Kemp280 comments
View flat
View list
"From: Raquel Velasco and Bill Buck. We would like to announce that the next scheduled production of the Pegasos has been sold out. Boards have been set aside for friendly developers, but all others have been sold. Another production of the Pegasos will follow in July." [ Source: Email forward... - CK ]

Update: More information was posted in comment 52.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Chris Young07-Jun-2002 16:32 GMT
Comment 2Kronos07-Jun-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 3yoodoo07-Jun-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 4NihilVor07-Jun-2002 16:47 GMT
Comment 5Kronos07-Jun-2002 16:50 GMT
Comment 6cheesegrate07-Jun-2002 16:53 GMT
Comment 7NihilVor07-Jun-2002 16:56 GMT
Comment 8gz07-Jun-2002 16:58 GMT
Comment 9JoBBo07-Jun-2002 17:01 GMT
Comment 10Kronos07-Jun-2002 17:02 GMT
Comment 11redrumloa07-Jun-2002 17:08 GMT
Comment 12Kronos07-Jun-2002 17:16 GMT
Comment 13Ben Hermans/Hyperion07-Jun-2002 17:20 GMT
Comment 14Ben Hermans/Hyperion07-Jun-2002 17:22 GMT
Comment 15Georg Steger07-Jun-2002 17:40 GMT
Comment 16acg07-Jun-2002 17:46 GMT
Comment 17JD07-Jun-2002 17:50 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous07-Jun-2002 18:05 GMT
Comment 19cOrpse07-Jun-2002 18:25 GMT
Comment 20AmiTroll07-Jun-2002 18:43 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous07-Jun-2002 18:47 GMT
Comment 22Leif07-Jun-2002 18:50 GMT
Comment 23Leif07-Jun-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 24Nicolas Sallin07-Jun-2002 20:12 GMT
Comment 25Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 20:41 GMT
Comment 26AmiTroll07-Jun-2002 21:46 GMT
Comment 27AmiTroll07-Jun-2002 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 22:19 GMT
Comment 29cOrpse07-Jun-2002 23:07 GMT
Comment 30Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:13 GMT
Comment 31Rob07-Jun-2002 23:15 GMT
Comment 32Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:24 GMT
Comment 33Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:26 GMT
Comment 34Marcus Sundman07-Jun-2002 23:27 GMT
Comment 35strobe07-Jun-2002 23:30 GMT
Comment 36Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:31 GMT
Comment 37cOrpse07-Jun-2002 23:37 GMT
Comment 38cOrpse07-Jun-2002 23:41 GMT
Comment 39amigammc07-Jun-2002 23:44 GMT
Comment 40Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:48 GMT
Comment 41cOrpse07-Jun-2002 23:59 GMT
Comment 42cOrpse08-Jun-2002 00:05 GMT
Comment 43Leif08-Jun-2002 00:19 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous08-Jun-2002 00:40 GMT
Comment 45Rodney McDonell08-Jun-2002 00:40 GMT
Comment 46anon08-Jun-2002 00:41 GMT
Comment 47gz08-Jun-2002 01:48 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous08-Jun-2002 02:32 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous08-Jun-2002 02:38 GMT
Comment 50sh33p08-Jun-2002 04:24 GMT
Comment 51hgm08-Jun-2002 05:24 GMT
Comment 52Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 05:37 GMT
Comment 53Raquel and Bill08-Jun-2002 05:42 GMT
Comment 54Don Cox08-Jun-2002 05:45 GMT
Comment 55Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 05:55 GMT
Comment 56Björn Hagström08-Jun-2002 06:15 GMT
Comment 57Turrican08-Jun-2002 06:31 GMT
Comment 58Bill08-Jun-2002 06:47 GMT
Comment 59Senex (Martin Heine)08-Jun-2002 06:49 GMT
Comment 60Rob08-Jun-2002 06:51 GMT
Comment 61Nicolas Sallin08-Jun-2002 06:55 GMT
Comment 62anarchic_teapot08-Jun-2002 06:57 GMT
Comment 63Raquel and Bill08-Jun-2002 07:04 GMT
Comment 64Rob08-Jun-2002 07:06 GMT
Comment 65Rob08-Jun-2002 07:08 GMT
Comment 66Bill08-Jun-2002 07:10 GMT
Comment 67Björn Hagström08-Jun-2002 07:15 GMT
Comment 68Raquel and Bill08-Jun-2002 07:21 GMT
Comment 69Kronos08-Jun-2002 07:22 GMT
Comment 70Nicolas Sallin08-Jun-2002 07:23 GMT
Comment 71Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Jun-2002 07:36 GMT
Comment 72Rob08-Jun-2002 07:36 GMT
Comment 73Rob08-Jun-2002 07:46 GMT
Comment 74Bill08-Jun-2002 07:51 GMT
Comment 75Rob08-Jun-2002 07:53 GMT
Comment 76Bill08-Jun-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 77Simon08-Jun-2002 08:23 GMT
Comment 78anarchic_teapot08-Jun-2002 08:32 GMT
Comment 79Bill08-Jun-2002 08:38 GMT
Comment 80Rob08-Jun-2002 08:44 GMT
Comment 81Raquel and Bill08-Jun-2002 09:00 GMT
Comment 82cOrpse08-Jun-2002 09:57 GMT
Comment 83gz08-Jun-2002 10:34 GMT
Comment 84Simon08-Jun-2002 10:44 GMT
Comment 85cOrpse08-Jun-2002 10:53 GMT
Comment 86kjetil08-Jun-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 87cheesegrate08-Jun-2002 11:18 GMT
Comment 88anarchic_teapot08-Jun-2002 11:22 GMT
Comment 89cheesegrate08-Jun-2002 11:27 GMT
Comment 90Don Cox08-Jun-2002 11:36 GMT
Comment 91Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Jun-2002 11:45 GMT
Comment 92cheesegrate08-Jun-2002 12:05 GMT
Comment 93cOrpse08-Jun-2002 12:08 GMT
Comment 94Bill08-Jun-2002 12:13 GMT
Comment 95Simon08-Jun-2002 12:15 GMT
Comment 96Bill08-Jun-2002 12:17 GMT
Comment 97Amifan08-Jun-2002 12:23 GMT
Comment 98Kronos08-Jun-2002 12:27 GMT
Comment 99Simon08-Jun-2002 12:27 GMT
Comment 100Simon08-Jun-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 101Lamer08-Jun-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 102gz08-Jun-2002 12:31 GMT
Comment 103Amifan08-Jun-2002 12:33 GMT
Comment 104cOrpse08-Jun-2002 12:33 GMT
Comment 105Bill08-Jun-2002 12:43 GMT
Comment 106JacHermans08-Jun-2002 12:45 GMT
Comment 107Simon08-Jun-2002 12:47 GMT
Comment 108Simon08-Jun-2002 12:51 GMT
Comment 109amigammc08-Jun-2002 12:52 GMT
Comment 110cOrpse08-Jun-2002 12:55 GMT
Comment 111Amifan08-Jun-2002 12:58 GMT
Comment 112Bill08-Jun-2002 13:00 GMT
Comment 113Anonymous08-Jun-2002 13:02 GMT
Comment 114bah08-Jun-2002 13:04 GMT
Comment 115Simon08-Jun-2002 13:04 GMT
Comment 116feh08-Jun-2002 13:09 GMT
Comment 117AmiTroll08-Jun-2002 13:09 GMT
Comment 118Simon08-Jun-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 119AmiTroll08-Jun-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 120Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 121cOrpse08-Jun-2002 13:11 GMT
Comment 122gz08-Jun-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 123Bearded, smelly GNU hippy08-Jun-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 124Simon08-Jun-2002 13:24 GMT
Comment 125Simon08-Jun-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 126Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 127Bill08-Jun-2002 13:28 GMT
Comment 128Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:33 GMT
Comment 129Daniel Miller08-Jun-2002 13:40 GMT
Comment 130Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:41 GMT
Comment 131Anonymous08-Jun-2002 13:51 GMT
Comment 132Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:54 GMT
Comment 133Anonymous08-Jun-2002 13:55 GMT
Comment 134Anonymous08-Jun-2002 14:01 GMT
Comment 135AmiTroll08-Jun-2002 14:07 GMT
Comment 136cOrpse08-Jun-2002 14:09 GMT
Comment 137Mekanix08-Jun-2002 14:22 GMT
Comment 138Simon08-Jun-2002 14:27 GMT
Comment 139galja gobba, nam nam08-Jun-2002 14:40 GMT
Comment 140AmiTroll08-Jun-2002 14:41 GMT
Comment 141anonymous08-Jun-2002 15:21 GMT
Comment 142oops08-Jun-2002 15:31 GMT
Comment 143anonymous08-Jun-2002 15:33 GMT
Comment 144Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 15:56 GMT
Comment 145Bill08-Jun-2002 16:06 GMT
Comment 146anonymous08-Jun-2002 16:55 GMT
Comment 147anonymous08-Jun-2002 17:09 GMT
Comment 148Björn Hagström08-Jun-2002 17:23 GMT
Comment 149Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 17:52 GMT
Comment 150Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 17:55 GMT
Comment 151Mekanix08-Jun-2002 17:57 GMT
Comment 152anarchic_teapot08-Jun-2002 18:07 GMT
Comment 153Johan Rönnblom08-Jun-2002 18:25 GMT
Comment 154Gingerbread Man08-Jun-2002 20:08 GMT
Comment 155Björn Hagström08-Jun-2002 20:15 GMT
Comment 156anonymous09-Jun-2002 02:30 GMT
Comment 157amigammc09-Jun-2002 02:50 GMT
Next Pegasos production sold out : Comment 158 of 280ANN.lu
Posted by Bill on 09-Jun-2002 03:03 GMT
Good morning!
OK, where did we leave off...
1. Why are we promoting hardware here?
Because we are looking for good developers and this works. We have found three new developers just like this and begun to have relationships with many others who have provided us useful insight and information into a variety of issues. The fact that the Pegasos is selling is interesting to any developer who wants to get in on this project early. Again, the Pegasos is a DEVELOPMENT MACHINE for the eclipsis. Please refer to www.thendic-france.com if you have questions.
2. In the meanwhile, what is the market for the Pegasos (while the eclipsis is in development)?
Probably: 1) Linux users, 2) embedded system developers, 3) application developers that want to do rendering on stacked boards with dual processors or build something very special that has a huge amount of processing power...
3. Will "Amiga" be a big market for us? We do not think so. First, because we are not an official Amiga piece of hardware, and secondly because we are using MorphOS. The two just don't go together.
4. How about the hardware issues and DCE....
As Amifan pointed out having the ability to prototype your own boards is a big plus. We are working with DCE because we can do that there as if it was our own shop. Forget all the other BS. There is no conspiracy against anything...has anyone noticed that the official bplan/MorphOS team has been absent from all these discussions for months? That is because they are hard at work and they know what they have to do. They are working with a great deal of confidence and they should be! The Pegasos and MorphOS are both great products. Is DCE involved in those activities...no. When we are ready to make a board we go to DCE and bring everything we need with us. That is it...
Just out of curiosity for all you folks that are carefully reading this -- how many people out there can document and forward it to us at the email address above either 1) a receipt for money lost or other proof of a paid order to Phase 5 when Phase 5 went bankrupt, or, 2) proof of money or a damaged board sent to DCE for repairs that was never returned, etc. We would really like to understand all the FUD on this. Our email address is good and our interest is genuine. By document, we would like to see an airbill, a cancelled check, an email exchange or just about anything that shows proof of loss. Any help here interests us. Thanks in advance for digging through your old records!
5. Re: Rose/Miss Teapot...
We can answer all her questions. We can do it here or privately. We have absolutely nothing to hide. Rose rejected our request to call her and the emails between us directly have been less than constructive -- completely on her account. We sent her the email addresses of our chief auditor and our corporate lawyer. She has chosen the public forum. We have been forced to respond.
Rose, we have concluded that you are not really interested in answers. What bothers us about you is that you select the "facts" that you want to make your points and ignore other information to the contrary. Your posts are full of this and that is why we think you are so out of order. You are hardly the professional you claim to be.
You did have one good idea though... after our 28 June Pretory SA board meeting when our 2001 accounts are approved we will post them on our website.
As to my poor performance (thanks for making this all so personal), what do you know about me, or Raquel, or anyone else at Pretory, Thendic (Germany or France), bplan, Pretory Technology, YVICam, etc.? What do you gain by bad-mouthing others personally? You started this. So, yes, that is a good idea...go to Google and do plenty of research and you or *anyone* out there can write us. We will be happy to have the dialogue. There are more than a few that know we can have a civilized exchange of information and opinion.
6. Re: Mr. ginger@bread.man
Climb out from under the bed with Turrican and the other anonymous posters and send me an email (without a virus). When we have had an exchange of opinions and information then you can call me whatever you want. In the meanwhile, I think you are a coward. Write me and we might change our minds and consider your opinion.
7. Re: Ben Hermans and FUD
Earlier on this thread we posted a statement about providing useful and helpful information to Ben in support of Hyperion's OS 4 effort. I do not want to quibble about this but we define "sources" and "source code" as two different things. Let's forget about my poor choice of words and consider the benefit of what was provided. Was it useful or not? Did we assist? Ben, are you willing to have us share the email with this thread that you sent us expressing your appreciation for what was provided? Please do not hide behind your "legal" objections? As we said in the last email we sent you, you are a talented and intelligent young man, but no more FUD. Your letter to ZDF was another classic example. Should we post this too? And, if you are serious about all your legal rantings you better get someone better than a real estate specialist to represent you in Frankfurt. You won't be jerking us around and if you are not careful you will find yourself in a very challenging legal position. No BS. No FUD. You will be held accountable. MorphOS is not illegal and does not need AmigaOS 3.x and certainly not 4.0 -- whatever that is. As another poster said -- "put up or shut up."
As an after-thought, maybe we should have taken a picture at the Cologne Amiga Show last December when Raquel and I, Gerald and Thomas (bplan/MorphOS), Rakesh and Sharwin (Coyote Flux/Thendic-France) and Juergen Haage (Haage and Partner) sat with you and the Freiden brothers and told you we were *all* ready to assist you. Petro even stopped by to give us encouragement. You had just announced that everything would be released shortly, but we all knew you were months away. Why didn't you want to cooperate Ben?
8. Yes, those Motorola processors we referenced were G4s.
Please get all your questions out...we will stay here as long as there are issues to be addressed! Or, at least until "work" on Monday...:)
Thanks,
Bill
Jump...
#162 hgm #163 Don Cox #164 Don Cox #165 Simpleppc #180 Christian #226 anarchic_teapot
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 159cheesegrate09-Jun-2002 03:56 GMT
Comment 160cheesegrate09-Jun-2002 04:20 GMT
Comment 161Trizt09-Jun-2002 05:39 GMT
Comment 162hgm09-Jun-2002 05:42 GMT
Comment 163Don Cox09-Jun-2002 06:12 GMT
Comment 164Don Cox09-Jun-2002 06:16 GMT
Comment 165Simpleppc09-Jun-2002 06:32 GMT
Comment 166Tbone09-Jun-2002 06:35 GMT
Comment 167cheesegrate09-Jun-2002 06:44 GMT
Comment 168TBone09-Jun-2002 06:54 GMT
Comment 169TBone09-Jun-2002 07:01 GMT
Comment 170Jürgen Lange09-Jun-2002 07:39 GMT
Comment 171Gingerbread Man09-Jun-2002 08:00 GMT
Comment 172Johan Rönnblom09-Jun-2002 08:39 GMT
Comment 173Gingerbread Man09-Jun-2002 09:13 GMT
Comment 174Björn Hagström09-Jun-2002 09:24 GMT
Comment 175cOrpse09-Jun-2002 09:26 GMT
Comment 176Don Cox09-Jun-2002 09:27 GMT
Comment 177Gingerbread Man09-Jun-2002 09:38 GMT
Comment 178Daniel Miller09-Jun-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 179Joanna09-Jun-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 180Christian09-Jun-2002 09:59 GMT
Comment 181Marcus Sundman09-Jun-2002 10:57 GMT
Comment 182Anonymous09-Jun-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 183Raquel and Bill09-Jun-2002 11:50 GMT
Comment 184Tony Gore09-Jun-2002 11:54 GMT
Comment 185Bill09-Jun-2002 12:02 GMT
Comment 186Bill09-Jun-2002 12:10 GMT
Comment 187Bill09-Jun-2002 12:26 GMT
Comment 188José09-Jun-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 189wouter09-Jun-2002 12:31 GMT
Comment 190Alkis Tsapanidis09-Jun-2002 12:36 GMT
Comment 191Alkis Tsapanidis09-Jun-2002 12:46 GMT
Comment 192Tony Gore09-Jun-2002 13:06 GMT
Comment 193Bill09-Jun-2002 13:28 GMT
Comment 194Anonymous09-Jun-2002 13:28 GMT
Comment 195amigammc09-Jun-2002 13:32 GMT
Comment 196Johan Rönnblom09-Jun-2002 13:51 GMT
Comment 197Daniel Miller09-Jun-2002 13:58 GMT
Comment 198Jürgen Lange09-Jun-2002 14:06 GMT
Comment 199Anders Kjeldsen09-Jun-2002 14:12 GMT
Comment 200anonymous09-Jun-2002 14:19 GMT
Comment 201Jürgen Lange09-Jun-2002 14:25 GMT
Comment 202Bill09-Jun-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 203André Siegel09-Jun-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 204cOrpse09-Jun-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 205anonymous09-Jun-2002 14:40 GMT
Comment 206TBone09-Jun-2002 14:42 GMT
Comment 207Alkis Tsapanidis09-Jun-2002 14:44 GMT
Comment 208Bill09-Jun-2002 14:51 GMT
Comment 209Anders Kjeldsen09-Jun-2002 14:51 GMT
Comment 210Bill09-Jun-2002 15:16 GMT
Comment 211André Siegel09-Jun-2002 15:30 GMT
Comment 212André Siegel09-Jun-2002 15:35 GMT
Comment 213cOrpse09-Jun-2002 15:38 GMT
Comment 214Alkis Tsapanidis09-Jun-2002 15:49 GMT
Comment 215anonymous09-Jun-2002 16:44 GMT
Comment 216Anonymous09-Jun-2002 17:24 GMT
Comment 217Daniel Miller09-Jun-2002 17:30 GMT
Comment 218cOrpse09-Jun-2002 18:02 GMT
Comment 219André Siegel09-Jun-2002 19:12 GMT
Comment 220André Siegel09-Jun-2002 19:17 GMT
Comment 221Jürgen Lange09-Jun-2002 21:00 GMT
Comment 222Anonymous09-Jun-2002 21:07 GMT
Comment 223Anonymous09-Jun-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 224amigammc09-Jun-2002 22:04 GMT
Comment 225André Siegel10-Jun-2002 04:14 GMT
Comment 226anarchic_teapot10-Jun-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 227Bill10-Jun-2002 08:14 GMT
Comment 228Klaus M. (Denmark)10-Jun-2002 09:36 GMT
Comment 229Björn Hagström10-Jun-2002 10:09 GMT
Comment 230Anonymous10-Jun-2002 10:29 GMT
Comment 231Simon10-Jun-2002 12:16 GMT
Comment 232Simon10-Jun-2002 12:23 GMT
Comment 233Simon10-Jun-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 234Simon10-Jun-2002 12:32 GMT
Comment 235Simon10-Jun-2002 12:38 GMT
Comment 236Bill Hoggett10-Jun-2002 12:55 GMT
Comment 237Anonymous10-Jun-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 238Anonymous10-Jun-2002 14:57 GMT
Comment 239Raquel and Bill10-Jun-2002 15:59 GMT
Comment 240Darrin10-Jun-2002 21:05 GMT
Comment 241Darrin10-Jun-2002 21:35 GMT
Comment 242Björn Hagström11-Jun-2002 02:51 GMT
Comment 243Anonymous11-Jun-2002 04:35 GMT
Comment 244Daniel Miller11-Jun-2002 07:07 GMT
Comment 245Darrin11-Jun-2002 13:53 GMT
Comment 246Darrin11-Jun-2002 13:55 GMT
Comment 247Anonymous11-Jun-2002 14:46 GMT
Comment 248Bill11-Jun-2002 14:46 GMT
Comment 249Darrin11-Jun-2002 15:13 GMT
Comment 250Bill11-Jun-2002 15:58 GMT
Comment 251André Siegel11-Jun-2002 17:45 GMT
Comment 252Anonymous11-Jun-2002 18:45 GMT
Comment 253Darrin11-Jun-2002 19:05 GMT
Comment 254Alkis Tsapanidis11-Jun-2002 20:24 GMT
Comment 255SimplePPC11-Jun-2002 22:24 GMT
Comment 256Bertrand Presles11-Jun-2002 23:03 GMT
Comment 257Darrin11-Jun-2002 23:41 GMT
Comment 258cheesegrate12-Jun-2002 00:16 GMT
Comment 259cheesegrate12-Jun-2002 00:19 GMT
Comment 260Anonymous12-Jun-2002 00:20 GMT
Comment 261cheesegrate12-Jun-2002 00:20 GMT
Comment 262Anonymous12-Jun-2002 00:21 GMT
Comment 263Samface12-Jun-2002 07:09 GMT
Comment 264Anonymous12-Jun-2002 07:39 GMT
Comment 265Bertrand Presles12-Jun-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 266Bill12-Jun-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 267Samface12-Jun-2002 09:33 GMT
Comment 268Bill12-Jun-2002 09:40 GMT
Comment 269Samface12-Jun-2002 09:43 GMT
Comment 270Bertrand Presles12-Jun-2002 10:13 GMT
Comment 271Alkis Tsapanidis12-Jun-2002 10:33 GMT
Comment 2723seas12-Jun-2002 11:35 GMT
Comment 273Anonymous12-Jun-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 274Alkis Tsapanidis12-Jun-2002 13:48 GMT
Comment 275Samface15-Jun-2002 12:53 GMT
Comment 276Anonymous15-Jun-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 277Anonymous15-Jun-2002 13:21 GMT
Comment 278Gingerbread Man16-Jun-2002 06:57 GMT
Comment 279Anonymous28-Jun-2002 13:54 GMT
Comment 280jerkyboys28-Jun-2002 13:58 GMT
Back to Top