04-Dec-2022 11:38 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Olaf Barthel InterviewANN.lu
Posted on 10-Jun-2002 09:11 GMT by Rodney McDonell56 comments
View flat
View list
Finaly i have finished my interview with Olaf Barthel. At near 6000 words, its not a bad read, and probably one of my best interviews yet. Get to know a great man, read it now!
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1w00t10-Jun-2002 07:54 GMT
Comment 2Rodney McDonell10-Jun-2002 08:31 GMT
Comment 3Rodney McDonell10-Jun-2002 08:51 GMT
Comment 4Robert Wilson10-Jun-2002 08:56 GMT
Comment 5Rodney McDonell10-Jun-2002 09:01 GMT
Comment 6Mike Bouma10-Jun-2002 10:02 GMT
Comment 7Seehund10-Jun-2002 10:06 GMT
Comment 8MrZammler10-Jun-2002 10:45 GMT
Comment 9Jack Me10-Jun-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 10Eva10-Jun-2002 11:07 GMT
Comment 11Björn Hagström10-Jun-2002 11:23 GMT
Comment 12Rodney McDonell10-Jun-2002 12:07 GMT
Comment 13Troels Ersking10-Jun-2002 13:57 GMT
Comment 14coldfire10-Jun-2002 14:13 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous10-Jun-2002 15:35 GMT
Comment 16Joe10-Jun-2002 16:01 GMT
Comment 17Alkis Tsapanidis10-Jun-2002 16:28 GMT
Comment 18TimeWillTell10-Jun-2002 18:28 GMT
Comment 19kjetil10-Jun-2002 18:34 GMT
Comment 20Johan Rönnblom10-Jun-2002 20:18 GMT
Comment 21coldfire10-Jun-2002 21:04 GMT
Comment 22sutro10-Jun-2002 21:16 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous10-Jun-2002 22:30 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous10-Jun-2002 22:32 GMT
Comment 25Alkis Tsapanidis10-Jun-2002 22:35 GMT
Olaf Barthel Interview : Comment 26 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by _Steve_ on 10-Jun-2002 23:22 GMT
In reply to Comment 23 (Anonymous):
It's that kind of comment that we can do without. Being dyslexic alters their perceptions of words, making various words appear jumbled. The fact that the posters writing may not be perfect doesn't mean you have to blatently tell them they need to have their texts monitored by someone who isn't dyslexic.
I am sure there are many non-dyslexics here who are equally bad at spelling and who have no excuse for it.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 27Amigan Software11-Jun-2002 00:04 GMT
Comment 28Rodney McDonell11-Jun-2002 00:09 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous11-Jun-2002 01:48 GMT
Comment 30Joe "Floid" Kanowitz11-Jun-2002 02:09 GMT
Comment 31kjetil11-Jun-2002 04:29 GMT
Comment 32Alkis Tsapanidis11-Jun-2002 05:20 GMT
Comment 33kjetil11-Jun-2002 05:48 GMT
Comment 34DaveMcK11-Jun-2002 06:23 GMT
Comment 35Don Cox11-Jun-2002 06:57 GMT
Comment 36Don Cox11-Jun-2002 07:02 GMT
Comment 37nOw211-Jun-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 38kjetil11-Jun-2002 08:41 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous11-Jun-2002 08:57 GMT
Comment 40Cluke11-Jun-2002 09:00 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous11-Jun-2002 09:02 GMT
Comment 42Leki11-Jun-2002 09:37 GMT
Comment 43nobby11-Jun-2002 09:42 GMT
Comment 44kjetil11-Jun-2002 09:49 GMT
Comment 45Bill Hoggett11-Jun-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 46Rodney McDonell11-Jun-2002 10:46 GMT
Comment 47Olaf Barthel11-Jun-2002 11:08 GMT
Comment 48Robert Wilson11-Jun-2002 11:16 GMT
Comment 49Olaf Barthel11-Jun-2002 11:20 GMT
Comment 50Rodney McDonell11-Jun-2002 12:15 GMT
Comment 51coldfire11-Jun-2002 22:30 GMT
Comment 52Vincent12-Jun-2002 01:20 GMT
Comment 53Don Cox12-Jun-2002 06:46 GMT
Comment 54Rodney McDonell12-Jun-2002 11:09 GMT
Comment 55Mike Veroukis12-Jun-2002 14:18 GMT
Comment 56DaveW12-Jun-2002 14:38 GMT
Back to Top