20-Jan-2022 02:58 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Olaf Barthel InterviewANN.lu
Posted on 10-Jun-2002 09:11 GMT by Rodney McDonell56 comments
View flat
View list
Finaly i have finished my interview with Olaf Barthel. At near 6000 words, its not a bad read, and probably one of my best interviews yet. Get to know a great man, read it now!
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1w00t10-Jun-2002 07:54 GMT
Comment 2Rodney McDonell10-Jun-2002 08:31 GMT
Comment 3Rodney McDonell10-Jun-2002 08:51 GMT
Comment 4Robert Wilson10-Jun-2002 08:56 GMT
Comment 5Rodney McDonell10-Jun-2002 09:01 GMT
Comment 6Mike Bouma10-Jun-2002 10:02 GMT
Comment 7Seehund10-Jun-2002 10:06 GMT
Comment 8MrZammler10-Jun-2002 10:45 GMT
Comment 9Jack Me10-Jun-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 10Eva10-Jun-2002 11:07 GMT
Comment 11Björn Hagström10-Jun-2002 11:23 GMT
Comment 12Rodney McDonell10-Jun-2002 12:07 GMT
Comment 13Troels Ersking10-Jun-2002 13:57 GMT
Comment 14coldfire10-Jun-2002 14:13 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous10-Jun-2002 15:35 GMT
Comment 16Joe10-Jun-2002 16:01 GMT
Comment 17Alkis Tsapanidis10-Jun-2002 16:28 GMT
Comment 18TimeWillTell10-Jun-2002 18:28 GMT
Comment 19kjetil10-Jun-2002 18:34 GMT
Comment 20Johan Rönnblom10-Jun-2002 20:18 GMT
Comment 21coldfire10-Jun-2002 21:04 GMT
Comment 22sutro10-Jun-2002 21:16 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous10-Jun-2002 22:30 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous10-Jun-2002 22:32 GMT
Comment 25Alkis Tsapanidis10-Jun-2002 22:35 GMT
Comment 26_Steve_10-Jun-2002 23:22 GMT
Comment 27Amigan Software11-Jun-2002 00:04 GMT
Comment 28Rodney McDonell11-Jun-2002 00:09 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous11-Jun-2002 01:48 GMT
Olaf Barthel Interview : Comment 30 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by Joe "Floid" Kanowitz on 11-Jun-2002 02:09 GMT
I'm not going to rag on the jokes, I'm just going to say they work better when the interviewee is in on them. :)
Olaf is deeper in the innards of the system than likely anyone posting in this thread. He obviously has good knowledge of exactly what it lacks. Still, I'm a bit nervous about the second-system syndrome brewing; much of the OS is outdated, but on the same token, it's the only thing left that everyone can agree is "Amigan." Further, we already have a second-system in the works- the DE.
Where Olaf is seeing cruft, I'm still seeing possibilities- it helps that I'm just some UI nut, who's barely used the OS. If Workbench can't handle regular gadgets, why not take advantage of the simple consistency the menu system lends, and work up a system that leverages that to provide different UIs? (This is, in fact, what seems to be happening, with the popup menus and presumably other extensibility.) If reading many tiny .info files to get at icons is a pain, why not have the filesystem reserve space for them and optimize their position in some way? Streaming media- others have made some great arguments for leveraging Datatypes, even as I'm pretty clueless, never having gotten off OS2.1.
I'm sure he recognizes the same things (heck, for all I know, he was one of those whapping me for failing to realize Datatypes existed!), but actually dealing with the poor mangled code must be a fair headache, and there are always those times that scrapping it and starting over seems like it couldn't possibly be any worse.
I know *I'd* like to see a Workbench replacement (though done with a set of UI problems in mind, not just for the sake of replacing Workbench), but for it to become default, there has to be some sort of connection with the past. Since there's only time for evolutionary development anyway, it's time to stop asking, "What can we replace ___ with?" and start asking, "How can we make ____ better?" That's what the developers, Olaf included, have been trying to keep in mind all along (even as the urge to drag it to the trash and replace it with a whiz-bang buzzword-compliant does-it-all-and-irons-your-pants-too Second System(TM) wells), and it's time to give them credit for it.
Jump...
#33 kjetil
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 31kjetil11-Jun-2002 04:29 GMT
Comment 32Alkis Tsapanidis11-Jun-2002 05:20 GMT
Comment 33kjetil11-Jun-2002 05:48 GMT
Comment 34DaveMcK11-Jun-2002 06:23 GMT
Comment 35Don Cox11-Jun-2002 06:57 GMT
Comment 36Don Cox11-Jun-2002 07:02 GMT
Comment 37nOw211-Jun-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 38kjetil11-Jun-2002 08:41 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous11-Jun-2002 08:57 GMT
Comment 40Cluke11-Jun-2002 09:00 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous11-Jun-2002 09:02 GMT
Comment 42Leki11-Jun-2002 09:37 GMT
Comment 43nobby11-Jun-2002 09:42 GMT
Comment 44kjetil11-Jun-2002 09:49 GMT
Comment 45Bill Hoggett11-Jun-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 46Rodney McDonell11-Jun-2002 10:46 GMT
Comment 47Olaf Barthel11-Jun-2002 11:08 GMT
Comment 48Robert Wilson11-Jun-2002 11:16 GMT
Comment 49Olaf Barthel11-Jun-2002 11:20 GMT
Comment 50Rodney McDonell11-Jun-2002 12:15 GMT
Comment 51coldfire11-Jun-2002 22:30 GMT
Comment 52Vincent12-Jun-2002 01:20 GMT
Comment 53Don Cox12-Jun-2002 06:46 GMT
Comment 54Rodney McDonell12-Jun-2002 11:09 GMT
Comment 55Mike Veroukis12-Jun-2002 14:18 GMT
Comment 56DaveW12-Jun-2002 14:38 GMT
Back to Top